2000

  • No More Cuts! No More Cuts!

    09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
    Original Author
    root
    Original Body

    Disabled Activists March on Sacramento to protest devastating budget cuts to disabled services.

    by Leroy F. Moore Jr.

    No More Cuts! No More Cuts!

    On April 7th 2003 the developmental disability community, state wide along with families, service providers, agencies ascended on the Capital in Sacramento, CA. The Community Advocacy Network headed by Marty Omoto Legislative Director of United Cerebral and Terry Boisot along with many organizations called a rally to the state capital and to attend two budget hearings pertaining to services, laws, and other programs that people with developmental disability rely on. “No more cuts, no more cuts!” Shouted over twenty-five hundred protesters marching to the Capital from the Sacramento Convention Center. Wheelchairs, canes, crutches, eye-seeing dogs, etc. took their aim, the proposed budget cuts in the developmental disability system. The beaming sun couldn’t take the direct attention away from the horrible Governor’s proposals that calls for the most sweeping cuts to the civil rights of persons with developmental disabilities ever. For example, the suspension of the 1977, Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act that only California has.

    In 1977 a Republican, Frank D. Lanterman, pushed the State of California to pass and sign into law, the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act which generally says that the State of California has the responsibility to provide services to persons with developmental disabilities through an Individual Program Plan, IPP…. The Lanterman Act happened under Ronald Reagan’s administration. This information is very interesting when you consider that the developmental disability community today is fighting to hold on to the Lanterman Act under a democratic administration of Governor Gray Davis! Under the Lanterman Act, developmental disabilities means a disability that originates before an individual attains age 18, continues, or can be expected to continue and constitutes a substantial disability for that individual. Also this term shall include disabiling conditions found to be closely related to mental retardation, cerebral palsy, epilepsy and autism. So why in 2003 state legislators and the Governor are backing away from their promises and duties under Lanterman Act?

    According to the Governor’s projections, California is facing 35 billion-dollar deficit for the upcoming fiscal year. This is the largest deficit ever faced by the state. To address this unprecedented shortfall the governor proposed a billion in reductions in Mid-year spending. Although the legislature is addressing some of the administration’s proposal in a Special Session, the legislature chose to address the proposals that were specific to the Department of Developmental Services, DDS, and Regional Centers as part of the regular budget process. The first hearings in the Assembly and the Senate took place on this day, April 7th.

    The rally started at the Convention Hall where Omoto and Boisot, pumped us up and discussed why we were here today. Weeks before April 7th Marty & Terry told everybody to put a face on these proposed budget cuts by brining pictures of family members, consumers and friends who will be victims of Governor Gray Davis proposed cuts. So when Omoto ordered us to raise our pictures, the convention center turned into a huge open family photo book, showing a diverse population of adults and youth with disabilities. The rally consists of testimonies from family members, Executive Directors, staff of organizations and individuals and advocates with disabilities. Also we were bless by the soulful, operatic and pop voice of Michael Valcour and a film of the history of the Developmental Disability Rights Movement in California that birthed the Lanterman Act .

    The first hearing was in the Senate, which we were grateful for because of the strong ties between Senator Chesbro who is the Chair of the full Budget Committee and Chair of the budget subcommittee number 3. He really knows our issues and at the hearing was very accessible to voices of consumers and families. Voices came from elders, communication boards, personal care providers, young adults and parents. The list of the major proposals that the hearing discuss were as follows:

    Purchase of Services Standards (POS) From a consumer and family viewpoint this proposal is very dangerous and the line of speakers showed that. Basically the Department of Developmental Disabilities would be authorized to limit the type, duration, scope, location, amount or intensity of services and supports. The Department would also be able to prohibit by type, the services and supports that are purchased by Regional Centers for consumers. In effect, the trailer bill language would end the Lanterman Act entitlements for persons with developmental disabilities. After much testimonies and holding up pictures of love ones and consumers, Senator Chesbro told the crowd he will fight for eliminating this proposal.

    Parental Co-Payment – Shook up the crowd and once again the line to testify grew. DDS proposes to establish a parental co-payment for Regional Center services delivered to children who live at home and are between the ages of three and seventeen. Another element of this proposal will be imposed on all families with incomes above 200 percent of the federal Poverty Level. Each family would be required to pay up to ten percent of its annual income for Regional Center services. The amount families would have to pay cannot exceed the cost of services provided by the Regional Center. Once again this proposal flies in the face of the Lanterman Act and on top of that the money collected from the Parental Co-Payment would not stay in the developmental disability system, it will go to the general fund to balance the budget etc. Many advocates and Executive Directors who have been around for a long time agree that this is a huge problem that has a long history in Califorina. Although the developmental disability system state -wide has a good reputation of pulling down great number of federal funds, it doesn’t stay in the system causing the system to be under-funded year after year. We can’t be truly sure but it looks like this proposal will be eliminated. The Department heads could not answer Senator Chesbro’s questions about this proposal. Many parents testify that they had to quiet their jobs or cut back to part-time because the needs and special supports their disabled child requires. Everybody express their inability just to live with the basic necessities and don’t know what they would do if they had to pay for services. Once again pictures of love-ones and consumers filled the room. One elder consumer even used poetry to express her feelings. Senator Chesbro requested a copy of her and my poems. After an artist spoke about his program at the National Institute of Art & Disability in Richmond, the Senator acknowledge his work by saying he has some paintings form disabled artists from the same program hanging in his office.

    Definition of Disability - DDS wants to redefine the State’s definition of “substantial disability,” which is used to determine weather individuals are eligible for service. Bottom line the new definition will be narrower, dropping a lot of people from social service programs.

    MEDICAL-CAL Optional Benefits Elimination – This proposal will eliminate 18 optional benefits in the Medi-Cal program. This will affect adults above age 21and not in long term care. “Optional Benefits” are as follows:

    Dental services, medical supplies, podiatry, acupuncture, chiropractic services, psychology, independent rehabilitation centers and occupational therapy, hospice, non-emergency medical transportation, optometry, optician\laboratory, physical therapy, prosthetics, speech\audiology; hearing aids, durable and medical equipment.

    Parents and consumers jumped to the mike and express how their lives are not optional! This is another huge issue and we don’t know the outcome on this one. “To put the word ‘optional’ in front of the above terms is like saying air is optional!” Mike L of LA. spelled out on his communication board. The above proposals are only some of the cuts that might take place. The Senate Hearing ended around 6pm but the day was not over. Off we went into the Assembly who is facing the same proposals. The crowd had thin out but we made our presents felt. Assemblywoman, Judy Chu, chairs the Budget Committee in the Assembly. It seemed to me that the disabled community has a slightly weaker relationship to the Chair Judy Chu compared to Senator Chesbro. Many of us left the Capital around eight O’clock and the light of the moon led us back to the Bay Area. For further information on the additional proposals in the Governor’s budget proposal or to get involved in the new CA Community Advocacy Network check out Marty Omoto at:

    United Cerebral Palsy Association
    1225 8th St. Suite 480
    Sacramento, 95814
    (916) 446-3202 email martyomto@crip.com

    Stay tune for moore info! Please write your representatives, Senators, Assembly members and the Governor. In 1977 California passed the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Service Act, now they are breaking their own law taking disabled Californians back to the days of dark rooms in institutions. Well, my brothers and sisters and I are not going back!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Budget Cuts Slashing Family Ties

    What do you see!

    Me and my brother, Mr. G.

    we, disabled

    fighting off negative labels

    pushing a spot at the political table

    Trying to live independently

    with help by a supportive system

    that we grew up in

    Medical, educational & housing needs

    all provided in an IPP & its all free!

    We can’t understand legislators’ solutions

    making parents pay for services

    eliminating the Lanterman Act, our foundation

    crippling our future!

    I’m trying to be a mentor

    advocating with my disabled brothers and sisters

    especially youth and us of color

    but legislators are putting up roadblocks!

    Proposing deep cuts

    look at me & my brother, Mr. G.

    and wake up

    Don’t put our independence in handcuffs!

    By Leroy F. Moore Jr.

    In response to the California’s budget crisis on people with disabilities

    Tags
  • Poverty: Chic and Exploited

    09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
    Original Author
    root
    Original Body

    by Alex Cuff/PNN Newsbrief Editor

    Until there was money to be made, no one really celebrated rural Florida’s contribution to architectural history. Now, several upscale developers are cashing in on the latest trend. “Cracker style” homes have features similar to those of the shacks built by some of Florida’s early settlers: corrugated-metal roofs, screened-in porches, and clapboard siding.

    “Crackers lived close to nature,” says Mike Reininger, a former executive at Walt Disney Co.’s hospitality development group, who is the creative force behind WaterColor, one of the developments where the new homes are being built. Every year, 15,000 bales of pine needles are brought in to hide the white sand and provide a backwoods feel. Large chunks of weathered tree branches are carefully strewn along trails to give the “freshly fallen” look.

    Michelle and Steve Coslick bought a million-dollar vacation home in WaterColor, which is being developed by the homebuilding subsidiary of Jacksonville-based St. Joe Co. "When I think cracker," says the 36-year old Ms. Coslick, "I think of getting back to the essence and away from material aspects of life." I guess there is nothing material about her 1,000 square feet of screened in porch where she does yoga or the $700 mahogany screen door.

    Last year it was “Bum Fights,” a couple weeks ago, it was the "hick hunt" for the CBS’s recycled version of the Beverly Hillbillies (see TJ Johnson’s article 1/28/03) and now the endearment of white trash housing as the latest get-rich-quick scheme disguised at creative architecture. Some older Floridians were disappointed at the recent revolution of “cracker” from a stigma to a symbol of architectural sophistication

    Tags
  • No Feliz Dia Del Padre

    09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
    Original Author
    root
    Original Body

    Day laborers present the Mission Police Chief and Mayor Willie Brown with a handwritten father’s day card.

    by Javier Guiterrez/PNN

    I have worked para muchos anos (I have worked for many years). I have done anything and everything just to feed myself and my family- now I am tired. I sell my labor on the street – hoping that at the end of each month I will be able to send money home to my family in Mexico, and put poco dinero away for another time, another place. There is only one problem, the new police chief, Greg Corrales of The Mission Police station has decided "to clean up" el’ Mision. What he means by that is to clean up agente pobre – the poor people. Since he has been at the job he has been "cracking down" on flower and Tamale vendors, (mostly elder mujeres), day laborers like me and homeless people who sleep on the streets. That is why we will have no feliz dia del padre.this year…that is why we had to speak up.

    ‘Tenemos que ser Unidos’ (We Must Be United), "We have to lose our fear, we have to stand up for our rights, Daniel Rosas, a fellow day laborer spoke outside of the Mission Police Station on Friday, June 15. Over 50 day laborers came to the station to present the police chief and Mayor Willie Brown with a handwritten father’s day card

    We have held repeated meetings, marches, speak-outs, and individual talks, to express our views but the Mission police station continues to ticket us and our potential employers for minor traffic violations and they refuse to strategize around alternate methods of ensuring traffic safety. That’s why we have decided to appeal to the Mission Police station one more time and then to take our demands to the person to whom the police are accountable - Mayor William Brown.

    "We are not against the workers, we think they are fine, we just want them to have their own place.." Mission resident Joe Pacoro told another reporter from PNN in an interview after the laborers had left the Mission to visit the Mayor.

    "The program they have now doesn’t work, it’s a %100 failure, if they took a building that’s being offered to them out on Bayshore they could have a big roomy place, it’s a great building" , stated another mission resident who openly supported the policies of the new police captain . "the police chief is doing a great job"

    When asked what they thought of the new building that The San Francisco Day Labor Program had secured on Cesar Chavez Blvd they replied, "It’s a Whole in the WALL!!"

    We asked a representative from The SF Day Labor Program why she thought the Mission residents called the new building a whole in the wall, she replied, " Because they want to move the workers out of the area, they want to get rid of us, that’s what this whole thing is about" She went on to relate a police "set-up" that took place a few weeks ago where they told the workers to move to another area and then proceeded to load them into a police van and arrest them, " Chief Corrales openly stated that he did that blatant set-up just to teach the workers a lesson"

    "The Chief is doing a great job, he just doesn’t want the workers to get run over, he wants them out of harms way" one of the Mission residents proclaimed when told about the police round-up.

    When we arrived at The Mayor’s office later that morning we were told that the Mayor couldn’t speak to us today because he was muey occupado
    (very busy) but his press secretary would present our card to the mayor, and that he would be happy to meet with some of us on another day, many of us decide to wait for as long as it takes….

    I have worked para muchos anos.. Now I am tired, I only hope that we will be listened to, that we can be left alone to work, to feed our families, only then will this be a Feliz dia Del Padre.

    Tags
  • What Gets Done in The Dark

    09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
    Original Author
    root
    Original Body

    A very low-income African Descendent Family fight the County Of Alameda to keep their assets, their grandmama, and their family housed …..The Sloan Family story continues….

    by Alexandra Cuff/PNN Community Journalist

    "What gets done in the dark gets brought to the light," Javelyn Wood’s plaintive voice sailed through the phone. Despite the tropical air seeping through my bedroom window, I got chills listening to Javelyn, one of Beatrice Sloan’s 45 grandchildren, who was relating to me the horror story of the abuse of her grandmother, eviction notices, and the theft of the family assets.

    Music and children’s laughter poured through the receiver as Javelyn went on to explain that her situation was "just making me more determined to help my gramma get back what she lost and what they took." Javelyn’s daughter Jayla sang a Christina Aquilera song in the background as Javelyn continued: "Where’s the money? It’s all in the paperwork, they know they are doing wrong. They don’t care, they didn’t think anyone would pick up on what they were doing. They thought they could keep taking from people." When Beatrice was put into Conservatorship, her family was convinced that her county-appointed conservator, Alfred Fischer, now owned the family estates.

    Well the Sloans certainly picked up on what they, Alameda County, were doing. Scott Sloan patiently explained to me, "I filled out a police report last week because I was paying rent to Alfred Fischer when it was supposed to be to ‘Beatrice Sloan in care of Alfred Fischer’." The Oakland police are investigating criminal charges against Fischer and 11 other employees of Alameda County for fraud and elder abuse.

    "Dark" describes the events that Alameda County has been afflicting on the Sloan family. "In the dark" would describe the way in
    which these injustices have been carried out. Against the odds of poverty and of being a single parent, Beatrice Sloan worked
    full-time as a dishwasher for thirty years during which she bought and maintained four houses, affording a home for herself and
    her large extended family. The result of providing for her family through toilsome restaurant labor, she became ill and was
    abducted along with her property, by the County Guardianship Program in the county of Alameda.

    When she was placed into The Excell Nursing Home, a board and care facility in East Oakland, two of her properties were
    consecutively sold - without the consent of the families living in the houses and without for sale signs indicating the pending sale - to apparently cover the exorbitant cost of the nursing
    home. In May, her son Scott Sloan who lives with Javelyn and Charles Wood and their 4 children, received a 30-day eviction
    notice without reason. Thanks to support and advocacy by POOR Magazine, DAMO and other agencies, the Sloans got a lawyer and the first eviction was dismissed on August 5th. Although the dismissal was cause for celebration, the Sloans were not in the clear: "We knew they’d come back with something else. We don’t sleep too easy," Javelyn admitted to me on the phone. On September 27th, they received the same eviction notice again but with the date from May whited out.

    I sat in my bed with interview notes, past POOR Magazine articles about the Sloan case, and information about Conservatorship from the NAMI (National Alliance for the Mentally Ill) website. I was confused about all the aspects of exploitation going on. This story is not only about unjust eviction and gentrification but about elder abuse and fraud. Beatrice is now in the Willowstreet rest home after the Sloans raised hell to get her out of the Excell. When they visited her one day at Excell, they pulled the
    covers off to discover a rotten smell indicating the neglect Beatrice has been a victim of. When Javelyn made an attempt to have her grandmother’s situation looked into and to complain about conservatee abuse, she was threatened by Alameda County that she was to be investigated for welfare fraud. When she contacted her case worker, the worker didn’t know anything about it. The threat was made without just cause in an attempt to
    intimidate Javelyn from pursuing justice for her grandmother.

    Beatrice Sloan was originally put on an LPS (Lanterman Petris Short) Conservatorship which can happen if the court believes
    that you are "gravely disabled" which means having a mental disorder that keeps you from being able to provide food, clothing
    and shelter for yourself. (At this time, Beatrice was not only providing shelter for herself but owned four homes which her extended family lived in and cared for.) The LPS Conservatorship can last for a maximum of one year at a time and can be renewed in court at the end of the year. A Conservatorship allows for the management of an incapacitated person’s affairs when he or she does not have an alternative mechanism in place to do so. The person always has the right to have an attorney present. If the individual does not want to be conserved, there will be a court hearing before a judge and/or jury, to determine their fate. These rights were never communicated to Beatrice’s family. Despite Beatrice’s 9 children, 45 grandchildren, 35 great-grandchildren and 1 great-great-grandchild, the documents held by Alameda County reflect there is only one family member who passed away in 2001.

    When the family tried to learn of where the income from the sold houses had gone, the most current of the 11 conservators
    which have been assigned to Sloan’s case over the past 8 years, Alfred Fischer, stated, "It’s not in my department." While it
    might not be "in his department" to cough up information about where the family’s money is, it’s apparently in his department to
    collect rent from the member’s living in the remaining properties and the money from the houses which have been sold. All this time the Sloans and the Woods have been paying rent to Alfred Fischer, an ex-property manager, whose name is on the lease as the landlord. The Sloans made their last payment to Fischer in April.

    Right now, the Sloan family is trying to bring Beatrice home. Javelyn’s cousin Richshalda has been through a lot in trying to
    gain Conservatorship over Mrs. Sloan. On October 3, 2002, she went to court and was reprimanded by the judge for having the
    wrong paperwork. The public defender rationalized telling the judge that she was given outdated paperwork and to ease up
    because she is representing herself without an attorney.

    In September the family filled out a police report with the Oakland Police in hope to uncover some of the duplicitous mysteries surrounding the case of Beatrice Sloan and her assets. The police officer who came to the house to listen to the Sloans’ account was the first officer they spoke with who was knowledgeable about Conservatorships. He confirmed what they already knew – Alameda County is not supposed to be selling the properties without the consent of a living conservatee and Alfred Fischer is not supposed to be collecting the rent in his name.

    I spoke with Javelyn today – they haven’t gotten much information back about the investigation but investigators have contacted Alfred Fischer and the police report described Fischer as being "hostile." We are hoping that despite the fact that Fischer and the Oakland Police Department both fall under the umbrella of Alameda County employees, the investigation with be thorough and just. Scott Sloan told me that if nothing comes of the Oakland investigation, they will take the case to the FBI.

    As time goes on, the Sloan family becomes more determined to illuminate the gross injustices they have been through. "We can only help people who are going through the same thing. It’s up to us." Javelyn told me, the background laughter and children’s voices still occasionally singing into the phone. "My grandma worked too hard. She’s being robbed. If my grandma was able, this wouldn’t be going on. They took advantage."

    Tags
  • One Year Rent Free…!

    09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
    Original Author
    root
    Original Body

    Grace Wells (Poverty Hero) Settles with Landlord

    by PNN staff

    After a two year devastating legal battle involving several tenants rights activists from SF Tenants Union (and media activists from POOR Magazine) Grace Wells, an 86 year old African descendent elder settles with her landlord. The settlement gave Grace a sizable cash settlement for moving costs and one year rent free.

    Although we at POOR are very happy that Grace received what was legally hers and in fact was able to fight the greed and sleaze that drives many Bay Area landlords to even consider evicting folk from their long-term residences, no matter how elderly or disabled they are, we are also very sad.

    As very poor folks who have lived (barely ) through the rages of eviction and houslessness, we feel that this Amerikkan system which supports landlords in their ongoing greed campaign is undeniably sad, and that Miss. Grace will have to withstand the rigors of a move from her home of 14 years just because she doesn’t own property….
    Well, our ongoing prayers and love are with her and….

    For more on Grace please read the following stories by POOR staff;

    The word grace means hope…

    I can't do no movin' or packin'

    I Can't Leave Here

    Grace Poverty Hero

    Tags
  • Male Complexity. Finally, Genetics show Men are Complex as Women.

    09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
    Original Author
    root
    Original Body

    We need more X's guys.

    Maybe Women need more Y's.

    Let's equalize it all so
    Women and Men have multiple
    Y-X chromosomes.

    by Joe B.

    Male Complexity Pt.1

    Ok, Male doc’s were and continue to be wrong when using male bodies as end all/be all as women suffered from complaints male gynecologists had little or no idea of comprehended.

    Its slowly being corrected.

    I’d say over corrected giving women an exaggerated sense of superiority, we know the symptoms as may men still act as if their Gods/Goddesses gift to the female race we know because it still with us.

    Women for the longest time at least two or three decades now believed after gaining power on their own that they are not the superior sex.

    Yes, you mature, are stronger emotionally, can in the throes of emotional turmoil think rationally unlike most men, verbally better at speech and use hemispheres of their brains as men us either on or the other.

    Of course feminine trump is always bringing life in the world.

    Though it is now know not all women able to conceive children have natural mothering instincts as with men who’s seed can contribute to making babies are father materials and men can nurture some better than the mother’s that gave their child life.

    Yes it seemed not long past women seemed to invade men’s cherished turf basketball to the boardroom and sacred male bastion of "men only social clubs" where men used social contacts to improve their business aspects.

    Women have the same its call it "Networking" though its a girl’s ‘uh, excuse me Women’s Sisterhood socializing younger or the contemporaries up the corporate, political ladders.

    I know it was a shock to most woman that some men don’t mind being home, watching, enjoying their son’s and daughter’s while they worked.

    At first it chafes being in unfamiliar territory of diapers, P.T.A., explaining sex and protection to both son’s and daughters plus temptation of other stay-at-home mom’s; his wife’s friends dropping by unannounced sometimes doing way more than help their hapless friends hubby with his small charges.

    Just because a guy’s at home without a job caring for his children makes him no less a man.

    It’s opened up many men to what women still continue to go through - the "having it all theme" of late 1970’s early ‘80’s rang hollow to many women scrambling to be both career woman and mother.

    Men saw these contradiction tried to warm them but speaking in dominant male language most women didn’t or couldn’t listen, had to prove things to themselves, the world at large and until cancer rates, job burnout take their toll only then did women begin listening.

    Donations C/0 Poor Magazine


    1448 Pine Street #205

    San Francisco, CA 94103


    Email:
    askjoe@poormagazine.org

    Tags
  • The Gray Cabaret

    09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
    Original Author
    root
    Original Body

    Senior Action Network's (SAN) 9th Annual Gray Cabaret at The Victoria Theatre

    A PNN ReViEwForTheReVoLuTioN

    by Michael Vizcarra/PNN Media intern

    They say you're only as old as you feel. If that's the case, the performers
    of the Senior Action Network's (SAN) 9th Annual Gray Cabaret at the Victoria
    Theatre are definitely in the prime of their youth. The Senior Action
    Network is a grassroots advocacy organization passionately devoted to issues
    which affect the Senior communities. SAN's mission is to organize and
    empower Seniors to influence public policy*. The Gray Cabaret showcases the
    wealth of talent of San Francisco's senior citizens. It features music,
    dance, poetry, and singing, highlighting the diverse multicultural,
    multiethnic make-up of San Francisco.

    Stepping into the Victoria Theatre (near 16th and Mission), the first thing I
    notice is the sense of pride exuding from the predominantly senior citizen
    audience who are here to support their friends, family, and their community.
    Even though the audience members are mainly senior citizens, there are people
    here who encompass a broad range of age from mothers, fathers, daughters,
    sons, granddaughters, and grandsons, all here showing their pride and
    support. Also present in the audience is Chris Daly, S.F. Board of
    Supervisors, whom the audience showed much appreciation for.

    The hosts for the afternoon's event are Angela Alioto (daughter of former
    Mayor Joseph Alioto) and Geraldine Earp (SAN's former President) who dedicate
    this event to Richard Reed, an advocate for homeless senior citizens, who
    passed away recently. After a moment of silence, I take a seat and prepare
    to enjoy a couple hours of entertainment. The first act is Henry Irvin doing
    his version of "Night and Day" followed by Dorothy Lefkovits doing her
    rendition of "Teach Me Tonight." Both songs are reminiscent of the
    1930s/1940s style of singing, when crooners and their lyrics really meant
    something.

    A few of the performances really caught the eyes of the audience and myself.
    One of them was the San Francisco Center Chinese Folkloric Dance Troop doing
    Tai Chi to a musical score. Their beautiful costumes, complete with red fans
    as props, brightened the dark theatre and captivated us with their fluid,
    youthful movements. I can see the pride beaming from the Troupe's faces as
    they performed their routine. Another artist that caught my eye was Erma
    Hennessy. She wrote and read a poem entitled, "When You Are Finally Old".
    This was a fantastic tongue-in-cheek poem about the daily ailments and little
    idiosyncrasies of everyday life of a senior citizen, " my teeth will sleep
    in a cup of water, that's where they will stay all night‚ I know in the
    morning, at least they'll be all white." She had us rolling in the aisles
    with laughter. It's very funny poem indeed, but also giving a sense of truth
    to what senior citizens go through. The last performance of Act One was by
    Jean Ammerman, who sang "Can't Say No". Her comical rendition of this song
    also had us cheering and laughing. Her performance was excellent, complete
    with the irony of being a senior citizen but playing the part of a little
    girl.

    Act II featured even more diverse performances. The International Folk
    Dancers, "Stelita", performed twice. The first being a traditional Mexican
    folk dance, and the second a Tango. Mario Herrera, a Filipino-American, sang
    twice as well, the first a Filipino folk song, "Cometan" and the second a
    Latin American folk song, "Usted". I had the pleasure of sitting next to Mr.
    Herrera's wife who was quick to show her pride and support of her husband by
    saying that he is an actor as well as a singer. She also showed generosity
    and kindness by offering me part of her sandwich and some fruit, which I had
    to accept out of respect, myself being a Filipino-American as well. Another
    performance that needs to be recognized was that of Mai Lan. She is the
    pianist who accompanied many of the performers in their songs. Despite the
    fact of having to be led to and from the piano, Ms. Lan showed how vibrant
    and youthful she really is by demonstrating the dexterity needed to play the
    instrument. Once seated in front of the piano, she was as nimble on the keys
    as any person of any age.

    The Gray Cabaret was a spectacular event. I was surprised myself at how much
    I enjoyed it. The diversity, the wealth of talent, and the sense of pride by
    the performers showed me that being a senior citizen is about being youthful
    and celebrating your strengths, achievements, and passions. If you are only
    as old as you feel, then these performers will forever be young.

    Tags
  • Get The Noose For Noosom and Prop N

    09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
    Original Author
    root
    Original Body

    An Opinion Editorial on Prop N by JR

    by JR/PNN-Bayview Community Journalist

    What would life be like if the city of San Francisco thought that you only
    needed $59 a month to stay alive? They would expect for you to make that
    money stretch to supplement your food stamps, if you get them,
    travel/commute to school or work, buy yourself, your children, and any other
    dependents clothes, buy cleaning supplies, save money to start a business,
    put your child/ren into youth development activities, which is so vital for
    Black youth in the 'hood, and try to relax on a meager $59 a month.
    San Francisco County Supervisor Gavin Noose'em is proposing with
    Proposition N, to take away a majority of the cash given to welfare
    dependents, with the promise of "guaranteed services" and $59 big ones.

    What "guaranteed services" are going to make up for the cash that is being
    taken? That's one thing that is not spelled out in his newspaper ads.
    Although he is not giving you enough information to make an informed
    decision, he definitely spells out that he wants for you to support his
    initiative. If you are wavering on whether to trust Gavin Noose'em or not,
    you should look at all the promises that were made to the residents of
    Hunter's Point in '97,from the city with the PG & E Power Plant. The city
    made an agreement with PG&E where they would close down their plant in
    Hunter's Point that year, but they ended up upgrading the facility, and they
    are currently, doing more business than ever. Another example of shady
    politics is the way that the navy refuses to clean up a 46 acre radioactive
    dump, in Hunter's Point, which is reported to be one of the most polluted
    areas in the whole country, and the city and county, for the most part are
    doing nothing on behalf of the people to insure a safe environment for
    future generations. If Supervisor Noose'em is really trying to help somebody
    why isn't he looking into these issues, environmental issues that effect
    everybody. Or is he operating out of self-interest?
    You can also look at it like this, by supporting Noose'em you are
    supporting a rise in the level of violent crime, East Oakland should show
    you, that "ain't nothing funny when the money gets low" like East Oakland
    based rapper A.E.M. s/c Askari X likes to rap.

    What's silly about this whole debate is the fact you can turn on the
    tell-lie-vision on any given day, and watch a news story vilifying Fidel
    Castro and Che Guevara, and demonizing the Cuban Revolution, which has found
    a way a way to satisfy all the basic survival needs for all Cuban citizens.
    All of this had been organized, under the Cuban Revolutionary government
    headed by Fidel, withstanding a 30 year U.S. embargo. If you are a citizen
    of Cuba, you could wake up tomorrow and have a heart attack, go and get open
    heart surgery, get bandaged up and walk out, without spending a penny.
    Noose'em is not talking about this caliber of services, in San Francisco,
    one of Amerikkka's richest cities, but Fidel is doing it in one of the
    world's poorest countries. Now you tell me who looks like the criminal. If
    Supervisor Noose'em is not trying to lench the poor people in the ever so
    rich city of San Francisco, he can prove it to us by giving up his salary,
    which is at least 100 times more than $59 a month, for a month to prove that
    he could live off $59 in the Bay Area's economy. If he isn't willing to do
    that he shouldn't ask any one else to do it.

    Tags
  • 80 Billion for the War while people are evicted from Next Door (Shelter)

    09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
    Original Author
    root
    Original Body

    San Francisco Department of Human Services implements Proposition N(ewsom) and begins eviction of Next Door Shelter residents

    by Dee/PoorNewsNetwork

    The San Francisco Department of Human Services (DHS) began implementation of SF Board Supervisor Newsom’s draconian Proposition N (Care Not Cash) even before the July 1, 2003 implementation date by serving eviction notices on people who are in long-term case managed programs like the SF shelter Next Door. (The rationale for this is that under Prop N, shelter beds are supposed to be prioritized for folks on SF’s CAAP program –welfare- and therefore not available for anyone on SSI, or the working poor - see Racial and Economic Cleansing #101
    for more info on this issue)

    While this economic genocide is waged on poor San Francisco residents, so-called liberal democrats like Nancy Pelosi who say the following; “We give unequivocal support and appreciation of the Nation to the president as Commander in Chief for his firm leadership and decisive action in the conduct of military operations in Iraq as part of the on-going Global War on Terrorism” and support the Bush administration budget which spends 80 billion to support the war on Iraq, Homeland Security and Airline Bailouts.

    More money for the war means less money for the states and cities – social programs to support housing and health education programs, etc. Please join POWER, POOR Magazine, The Coalition on Homelessness and other poverty rights activists and poor folk in fighting this racist and classist proposition, see below for info on an upcoming action....

    UNITE TO FIGHT AGAINST SHELTER EVICTIONS

    Say No to Expulsions and Exclusions in the San Francisco Shelters

    The Department of Human Services in San Francisco has hatched a plan
    to hijak the shelter system as part of their plan to set up Prop N
    (the cuts to assistance for the homeless initiative). They plan to
    force homeless county assistance recipients into the shelter and
    expel the non-assistance recipients who are immigrants, seniors,
    workers, and people with mental illnesses or other disabilities. All
    of this just to turn a profit. Come stand with POWER to say No
    Expulsions, and No Exclusions! We Demand Shelter for All!

    March, Rally, and Press Conference


    Thursday April 17th, @ 4 PM,

    Meet at the office of the Coalition on Homelessness

    468 Turk St. @ Larkin

    When Newsom and the tourism industry poured thousands of dollars into
    their lie campaign for Prop N, they were full of promises. Sure our
    checks were gonna be cut, but in the place of our wages we were going
    to housing, food, and services. Now that July is just 2 months away,
    the truth is coming out that Prop N is nothing more that $59 and a
    shelter bed. Last week, Next Door (the city's "care facility") made
    all of their residents sign eviction notices stating that no one
    could remain in the shelter after June 30th. (notice then revoked
    one week later) Why? Because DHS's big care plan is to force all
    homeless CAAP recipients into the city's over-crowded shelter system
    and charge them $300 rent a month, while forcing all immigrants,
    disabled people, and working poor folks out into the streets. That's
    not care, that's discrimination. Trent Rhorer even said that they
    hope the new system will be so worthless and difficult that they
    expect over 80% of to just quit the program and fight for own
    survival on the streets with no assistance at all. That's bullshit!
    Are we going to continue to let these politicians make their wealth
    off our poverty? Hell no! Now is the time to fight back!

    --

    People Organized to Win Employment Rights (POWER)

    32 - 7th Street

    San Francisco CA 94103


    415.864.8372 - phone

    415.864.8373 - fax

    Tags
  • Optional for who?

    09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
    Original Author
    root
    Original Body

    The shocking impact on the disabled and elderly of the unofficial implementation of Proposition N

    by Tiny and PoorNewsNetwork’s Shelter observer

    We are finger printed

    Photo image printed, in living color

    Social Security numbers registered

    My privacy invaded, My rights violated

    What’s a Poor Client to do?

    The homeless, elderly , disabled, wheel chair bound

    Kicked out of the shelters

    Belly half empty

    Thrown into a Mad Rush to get a shelter ticket

    Twenty blocks a way

    Still you might not receive a bed

    And then the Side Walk Hotel for you that evening!

    "Optional for who?" PNN’s shelter observer proclaimed ,as she and I sat in deep worried discussion about the impact of Proposition N hovering over our morning coffee in the POOR Magazine breakfast room. It was free breakfast day at POOR- one of our only remaining free breakfast days due to our own organizational funding crisis in these post budget cut dog dayz of summer.

    "they say optional on the fingerprinting form – but then they say, " yea, its optional – but you won’t get a shelter bed if you don’t do it", Ever since the unofficial implementation of Prop N in San Francisco’s shelter system there has been an extremely illegal, ageist, and ableist, manifestation of procedure on the very poor who seek a bed in the City. On paper and in person, Trent Roher, executive director of SF department off Human Services and his representatives have publicly stated that all of these "registration requirements" are completely optional for all people seeking a shelter bed. And then in reality all the people who actually use the services have been forced into "registering" and have encountered an impossibly confusing and difficult situation.

    "The hoops they make us jump through are so crazy- nobody can do they requirements if you’re not young and healthy, the other day, I started helping all the elderly women in the shelter to get through all the requirements. They had to take two buses just to get to the registration place, where they get fingerprinted and scanned. By the time we made it there at 8:00 am, the beds were all gone, They were told to come back at 7:30 p.m that same day. to "SEE" if any were open, If none were available, they told us to come back to tomorrow,If they all weren’t so out of breath, they might have laughed.

    Since the beginning of this whole process, originally inspired by SF board supervisor , Gavin Newsom,s attempt to become mayor on the backs of the poorest people in San Francisco, Sf Department of Human Services has begun the default implementation of a Prop N "alike" set of rules and regulations which results in making San Francisco’s shelter system impossible for most people, meanwhile, poor folks and advocates gear up for a July 8th hearing/debate between Newsom’s prop N, Jake Mcgoldricks’ anti-displacement legislation which will make it illegal to prioritize shelter beds at all and Chris Daly’s legislation which makes funding go into housing instead of shelter.

    "If they vote in Prop N without McGoldrick’s legislation being passed – me and the other disabled elders, working poor and immigrants in the shelters – are out – its that simple, I don’t know what to do" She drained her coffee cup with an angry thump and neither of us knew what to say to each other – I tried to look strong and inspiring but at this moment, I was unable to…

    Postscript; At the Tuesday, July 15th BOard meeting McGoldricks' legislation passed unanimously - Newsom's legislation was tossed around and ended up being sent back to committee for further discussion (read:time wasting)

    Tags
  • I Don't Want Other women to Suffer as I Have Suffered Pt2

    09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
    Original Author
    root
    Original Body

    Teresa's Legacy:The Women's Rights Case That Changed the World

    by Tanya Brannan/Purple Berets

    A hush fell over the courtroom as Sara Hernandez began her second day of testimony in the María Teresa Macias federal civil rights trial in San Francisco. All eyes were on Sara as she told the story of her daughter‚s valiant but ill-fated attempts to escape her husband‚s violence. 

    But that escape was not to be.  On April 15, 1996, Avelino Macias brutally murdered Teresa, shot Sara, and then lay across Teresa‚s dying body and blew his brains out.

    Before that awful day, Teresa Macias had contacted the Sonoma County Sheriff‚s Department more than twenty times to report Avelino‚s obsessive stalking; threats to kill Teresa, her children, her mother and other family members in Mexico; and a number of other felony crimes. She‚d had friends, family and employers report incidents they themselves had witnessed, got multiple restraining orders, and reported every violation of those orders to the sheriff.  In short, Teresa Macias did everything right. 

    But the Sheriff‚s Department did everything wrong.  They never cited or arrested Avelino, despite their own policy and California law requiring that they do so.  They called Teresa crazy, told her to quit coming in and to just write down her complaints instead, and then never bothered to translate the diary pages she brought them detailing more than 30 separate crimes.  They took her children into Child Protective Services custody because Teresa could not protect them >from Avelino‚s violence and sexual abuse.  And through it all, they only even bothered to write two police reports.

    On the witness stand, Sara Hernandez described Teresa‚s constant fear of >Avelino, a man who had beaten her, raped her repeatedly, and shot a man in the head in their home in front of Teresa and her three young children.  He had molested and beaten with broomsticks those same children, and put cigarettes out on Teresa‚s arms.  And then Sara described the day he murdered her.

    As Sara and Teresa arrived for their housecleaning job on that drizzly April morning, Avelino lay in wait.  After he forced his way into the car; Teresa escaped and ran into the house.  When he forced his way into the house, Teresa fled to the sidewalk.  As Sara picked up the phone to dial 911 she heard Teresa plead, "For God's sake, for God's sake, don't do it, don't do it." And then she heard the shot.

    Sara went to the front door and saw Avelino running up the sidewalk shooting wildly.  I slammed the door closed and leaned against it because ... I was afraid, Sara testified.  Then Avelino shot me [in both legs].  I fell to my knees.  As he turned to leave, Avelino said, laughing,  "My stupid mother-in law, I have killed your daughter."

    Moments after this chilling testimony, the courtroom sat in stunned silence as attorneys for the Sonoma County Sheriff announced they had reached a settlement agreement with the Macias family.  And with that historic $1 million settlement ˆ the first-ever paid by a law enforcement agency for their failure to protect a domestic violence victim leading to her homicide ˆ one of the most important women's rights cases in U.S. history came to a dramatic end.
    María Teresa Macias v. Sonoma Co. Sheriff Mark Ihde had already made history in July 2000, when a unanimous decision by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals held that the constitutional violation in the Macias case was the Sheriff‚s Department's failure to provide her non-discriminatory law enforcement.  That precedent-setting decision, the first and clearest ever to state that women victims of domestic violence have a right to Equal Protection under the U.S. constitution, kicked open the doors to justice for the millions of women victimized by their violent partners every year.

    But the Macias case is not only a legal victory, it is a victory for grassroots activism.  Myself (Purple Berets) and Marie De Santis of Women‚s Justice Center investigated and exposed the sheriff‚s misconduct, organized six years of demonstrations, events and media revelations, found the attorneys and formulated the legal strategy, and helped the family deal with a host of other needs in the wake of Teresa's murder. 

    And in the end, we all fulfilled Teresa Macias' last wish.  In the days before her murder, Teresa told her mother Sara, „If I die, I want you to tell the world what happened to me.  I don't want other women to suffer as I have suffered; I want them to be listened to.

    For more on the María Teresa Macias case go to www.purpleberets.org or www.justicewomen.com, or read Tanya Brannan‚s two-part story in the Albion Monitor at www.albionmonitor.net. ///>///>

    PURPLE BERETS

    Women Defending Women

    PO Box 3064

    Santa Rosa, CA 95402

    707.887.0262; fax 707.887.0865
    http://www.purpleberets.org
    ///>

    Tags
  • Prop N. is Unconstitutional

    09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
    Original Author
    root
    Original Body

    PNN Community Journalist finds a little known code 602 (n) which makes Prop N aka Care Not Cash Unconstitutional

    by John X/PNN Community Journalist

    A few weeks ago I was staying in a shelter here in the city and me and one of the staff got into an argument that ultimately led to the police being called. This is a short story and history lesson for what happened. Hopefully some insight and knowledge will flow from this to help the entire shelter and S.R.O community.

    Upon engaging this staff person in this argument I decided to call the police since I was told I was going to be " put the fuck out". I called the police and explained a staff person was going to put me out of a shelter of which I had a contract with management (CASE MANAGER) for services for this facility.

    To avoid any more problems or confrontations I waited at the bottom of the stairs inside the facility for the police to arrive. A senior manager arrived and asked me why I was at the bottom of the stairs after curfew. I advised this person a staff member had thrown me out of the facility or at least had threatened to do so and I was waiting for the police. He briefly stated " she can't do that" and "give me a minute and I will talk to her".
    I waited at the bottom of the stairs for his return while at the same time wondering where San Francisco's Finest were at.

    A few minutes later the senior manager came back to the top of the stairwell area and stated " you have been denied services and you have to wait on the outside of the gate for the police." This is where it becomes interesting, as I agreed to comply again to avoid any confrontation or even appearance of confrontation with this facilities staff.

    Upon arrival of the police their was a great debate as to what the staff wanted as opposed to me, the person who had actually called for the police intervention.

    With 4 officers, 2 police, 1 sergeant and the acting lieutenant for the station we all began the discussion not in my return to the property, but exactly in what manner or fashion I was to not be allowed to return. The lieutenant told me that they had not removed me from the property (I removed myself when I stepped outside the gate) but at the same time had no authorization to return me. We argued back and forth a bit and the only thing I was told was they could assist me in removing or gaining access to whatever property I had in the facility but would not assist in any matter with my return as the matter was now civil in nature. I attempted in vain to explain to the police that I had a contract with this facility between myself and the case manger thus " by invitation of resident or management" I was allowed to be on the property. However this proved to be useless and went absolutely nowhere. After this 20 minute interchange I was told matter -of- factly by the police there was nothing they could or would do to assist me and I was out and they were leaving, period!

    Since I had nothing better to do, (sleeping now not on the agenda) I decided to take a walk to 850 Bryant street. I spoke with the lieutenant for the station and had asked him how it was that the police could use the term " agent or representative" to give the shelter staff the authority to remove someone but for the purposes of enforcement for a violation (my unlawful removal and failure to allow re-entry) the case was now a civil matter.

    The lieutenant could not explain the interchange of the two to any degree of validity and finally went to his office and came back with section 602 n of the California penal code. He had originally attempted to state that these "shelter type" facilities have their policies and procedures and under those procedures can lawfully remove someone as they chose from the property.

    He was absolutely unequivocally wrong! When he returned he handed me a copy of 602 n and in short this is what it states. After reading the entire section the last paragraph reads " however this subdivision shall not apply to persons on the premises who are engaging in activities protected by the state or federal constitution, or persons who are on the premises at the request of a resident or management and who are not loitering or otherwise suspected of violating or actually violating any law or ordinance".

    What this means or meant for me was this. When I had the argument with the staff I was invoking my first amendment rights (freedom of speech), also I was not charged by the police with "violation of any law or ordinance" i.e. penal code 415 - disturbing the peace.Also I had permission (request) to be on premises by management by my contract with case management for services. As such I was entitled to be present on this property. I was also entitled to have the staff attendee charged with violation of 602 n and if necessary then removed from the property for violation of 602 n and legally if staff refused to leave property also arrested and charged with standard trespassing (Penal Code 602) and criminal trespassing (Penal Code 602.5). Though I was denied any of this, I have learned that civil remedies are available to me for the police department refusing to take any actions on my behalf that I was legally and constitutionally entitled to.
    Now what this means for you someone in an S.R.O environment is this. First, let me explain how this section works so you can better understand how it could fit into your situation. The rules for single room occupancies are just that, rules. Not laws or ordinances just rules. The best example I can give you is this, municipal code 25 (sleeping in doorways) is a city ordinance. That ordinance allows the police without the owner to be present on the property to remove and arrest any person found sleeping in their doorway for the state penal code (law) of trespassing 602 PC. Because again local ordinance municipal penal code 25 has been violated.

    You have a right to use your space as you see fit as long as you are not in violation "of any law or ordinance" period !. This covers overnight guests, visitors (local-out of town) etc. You are paying to stay there. Your rights can not be infringed upon by anyone.
    Unless the rules or policies for San Francisco single room occupancies has been standardized and local ordinances have been created with hearings held by the Board of Supervisors with voter approval and ratified they all are illegal and unconstitutional and could and should be challenged in federal court.

    Now how this applies to proposition N is quit simple. Prop N states that any recipient on assistance who is in non compliance with a policy of a shelter provider and is removed from a shelter facility will be considered to be in non compliance with the requirements for his/her general assistance and will be removed from the general assistance program.
    As a note, I have kept copies of the original legislative version as proof to this statement
    " For the record".

    .None of these shelters or single room occupancies have any laws or ordinances that support the actions of which some of the management and staff take. Although it has been stated that numerous homeless service provider organizations worked in collaboration with the Board of Supervisors on " acceptable policies and procedures " none of those procedures or policies are constitutional and can not be upheld if held to any degree of legal scrutiny of which I emplore this readership to do. It should be noted that federal law on this in two specific areas is quit clear. First, title 18 U.S.C (United States Code) Sect. 241 makes it a crime to conspire to deprive someone of their civil rights. Title 18 U.S.C Sect. 242 makes it a crime to deprive a person of any right under color of law. This section applies to everything from judges to appointed or elected city ,county or state officials (including police officers)in official capacities. I remind this readership that proposition N was drafted by "lawyers" and the rules of the city S.R.O'S was drafted by , supported and approved by the Board of Supervisors. Probably the most important point I should make to this readership is the following, federal law precludes any group,organization,or government body from creating any rule or law that is either know or to be know as unconstitutional. If it is found that any group,organization or government has created a rule or law that is found to be unconstitutional in any regard that law is to be considered immediately voided. As it is the position of the federal government that no one is to be held whether knowingly or unknowingly to any rule or law that violates any of the constitutional protections of any citizen of the United States Government. If we allow proposition N to pass we will continue to allow this city to bash the civil right of a group of people who continues to have less and less of a voice in this city except by "poverty pimps" who claim to be working for the interests of the indigent but at the same time non of them has taken the time to present a story of this type to this many people with as much of a potential legal and financial impact as I, John X, have.

    Tags
  • Grace

    09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
    Original Author
    root
    Original Body

    by By Isabel Estrada

    Chapter 1. The Girl With Long Hair
    "Mama, every inch that my hair grows, I come closer to death," said Indravas to her mother. But Kaza only laughed and said; "Don't you ever listen to my words? A woman's spirit never dies, it rises and falls like an abandoned ship, but it never dies. Haven't I told you the story of Grace Vayshnavia?"

    Chapter 2. All Spirits Must Rest
    Grace Wells' small home was at 908 Page St. in a city that pretends to be big, in a state that pretends to own the sun, in a country that pretends to own the sky. It just so happened that that morning there was a crowd of people outside of her home. They were protesting another phase of the invasion of the Yuppies that would force Grace out of her home and set her right in the middle of the street. However, they hadn’t come to understand the special powers of a woman’s spirit and therefore didn’t know that in a sense, she was gone already. Grace no longer wanted to fight against the invasion of the peculiar species that had taken over her neighborhood years ago and was still taking over the small city. These invaders, called Yuppies, followed, literally followed in straight lines like the seam on Khaki GAP pants, two basic principles: money and trends. And it had happened that the confident, oblivious invaders had chosen her city as their biggest conquest. In the process they would clear the vibrant, tense streets in order to move in their own colorless lives.

    But the spirit named Grace had been inhabiting the body named Wells since Wells was nine years old, when her Mother disappeared and she realized that she was all alone in the world. Grace had helped her get up in the morning and get to work when in reality she was tired and would rather curl up in her bed and dream of other times and other lives. She'd given Wells the necessary portion of optimism to numb the pain of arthritis and a heart condition. In Wells' 84th year, Grace had provided her with the power to continue fighting the landlady who wanted to include Wells’ home in a large mansion for herself. Grace beat at Wells’ heart whenever she started to believe what her landlady said, believe that perhaps she herself didn't exist. Grace helped keep her warm when the landlady turned off her heat in the middle of winter.

    Grace had done her duty in the fierce woman's body and now would do it somewhere else. Even while protecting this body Grace had dreamt of music, of dancing, of a life lived on the edge of a dream. So when she lay down that night, sick of the quiet streets, she knew that her time in this body was up.

    She waited for the tired limbs to loosen into the bed, she waited for the brown eyes to sink into their sockets, she waited until all the pain had left the feet and the wrinkles over the third eye had relaxed, and she left. Grace rose like steam. Below she saw the people grow small and then they disappeared and all she could see were cars. Then the cars disappeared and there were only buildings. Finally the buildings turned into patterns of color.

    Grace wasn't sure where to go next. She didn’t know whether she should take a rest or move onto another body. But as she stopped to think she began to hear all the cries of the bodies down below. One collection of hoarse sobs seemed to stand out among the rest. She looked down and saw a sea of black hair that looked as though it had been taken by a storm god. The sadness in the woman’s breath drew her down, down, down. That's how Vayshnavia became strong. Grace's spirit came down to hold up her sinking body, and the spirit that was in Vayshnavia's body went to the bottom of the sea to rest awhile. All spirits must rest."

    Chapter 3. Women
    "I don't remember Grace Vayshnavia ever being weak," said Indravas willfully to her mother Kaza. "Vayshnavia is like any woman, when she is weak she looks the strongest and when she is strong she looks like a calm meadow. But do not disturb the meadow for it has roots beneath the soft grass, and snakes are always under foot. You were too little but there was a time when our tribe was under a spell… The story starts long, long, long ago….

    Chapter 4. The Little Boy With Claws
    He had always been small, which made it hard for him to live on the streets. He had to fight off all the evil spirits with the razors that he glued onto his fingernails. His oversized shirt hung down below his hands. The razor nails only emerged if someone tried to harm him first, or when he tired of being the last one of the crowd of boys to get to the trash can. When he tired of not even being able to get to the leftover food, when he tired of being left only the leftover cardboard, he would sometimes scratch his way to the front of the crowd, where the biggest boys with the most weapons would just step over him, slightly annoyed.

    So when a Little Brahmin (1) found him one day and brought him home to food and clear water, he thought that Brahma (2) had finally helped him. He had snuck into a Sudra (3) village the night before. He was surprised to be mistaken for a Sudra; he had always learned that a Brahmin could smell an untouchable for miles. But under this Sudra disguise he could become a Brahmin pet, which was more than he had ever hoped for.

    Chapter 5. Life Is Never Easy
    At first it was an easy life. The little boy exchanged his claws for clean clothing and was given the name of Pet. All he had to do was play with the Little Brahmins when they wanted and allow himself to be stuffed with good food and sweet fruits.

    One day the Little Brahmins decided that they would go to the Sudra compound to watch the women washing themselves in the river. There were only four seats in the moving tent, so Pet cleverly said that he did not want to go. But the oldest Little Brahmin, who enjoyed Pet’s smart humor, made another Little Brahmin –the one who always complained- stay and forced Pet to go in his place.

    When a Big Brahmin found that the Little Brahmin had been left out for a Sudra pet, the earth had no rest from his stomping feet. The Big Brahmin waited for the boys to return from the washing river. He let all the Little Brahmins pass and then blocked Pet’s way. He said, "little pet, you are too smart for your own good, from now on you will learn your place, you will be my Little Pet." And thus it was that Pet became like a doormat for the Big Brahmins to walk on. No more good food. No more clear water.

    Chapter 6. A Window In The Hall
    On his 15th birthday Pet passed by a window. He noticed a boy that looked like a dog. He had a sturdy frame, a fine sharp jaw and beautiful green eyes, but he walked like a cowering dog, kicked too many times in the stomach. When he cringed at the awful boy, he saw the boy cringe back and realized that the boy was he, Pet. The shame enveloped him like the fire that sometimes emerges from a lotus. "Little Pet!" He heard the sickening snarl of the one he had come to call master. But man has his limits and so Pet took out the knife he used to cut his master’s meat and instead cut his master. From then on he called himself Veerappan and vowed never again to be anyone's pet.

    Chapter 7.Veerapan and Vayshnavia
    Her wide hips swirled like jungle snakes around his thoughts. "We have the most beautiful women in the world," shouted Veerappan as he examined the large flexing thighs of the dancer and slammed his cup of throat-burning Varusha (4) down onto the elephant bone table. He seemed half-animal-half-human with his broad shoulders, hard, mahogany-colored body, stocky fingers and green laughing-wolf eyes. The huge creases on the sides of his mouth are from smiling too much. At his side was Vayshnavia. Her black hair grazed the ground as she sat, with legs open wide and firmly planted to the ground, devouring her meal. She was tall with knife-edge cheekbones, piercing black eyes and a mouth that could put anyone to shame. Her fingers were long, with knots at every joint. Veerappan called them the hands that could hold up the world.

    Eyes focused on the dancer, Veerappan grinned and announced, "Yes! I will take her tonight." But Vayshnavia quickly broke into his train of thought with her thundering laughter, picked up her knife and held it over the thick vein pulsating in the center of his hand, her eyes smiling viciously. "No, on second thought, she is not beautiful enough for me," Veerappan announced with a hyena grin. Vayshnavia's smile faded, she set down the knife and continued chewing on her snake meat. Veerappan never had and never would be with a woman other than Vayshnavia, he values his life too much. But looking at the dancer reminded him of the stories his grandmother used to tell him, before she died and left him alone in the world. She said that they were descendents of the original travelers. It was because of his great-great-great grandmother’s sin, being taken by a gadje (5), that his family stayed in the original land and never got to the far off places that are now the lands of his relatives. After killing his shame and his master in one fell swoop, Veerappan became determined to follow the ways of his people. This meant there were only two peoples, the original travelers and the gadje, and the original travelers had the right to live off of (and entertain themselves at the expense of) the gadje’s naivete. That’s how it had been since the beginning of time. He insisted that caste meant nothing to him.

    Chapter 8. The Boy With Almond Eyes
    Vayshnavia had prayed endlessly to the earth and the forest to give her a son. When finally her belly had begun to swell she became unbearable. She demanded to be carried everywhere. She brought out her knife at the slightest provocation. She would only eat freshly picked fruit and freshly butchered meat. The baby Neera came out with Veerappan’s grin and Vayshnavia’s black almond eyes. Vayshnavia carried him everywhere, making Veerappan red with jealousy. Finally they had an argument, the only one in which Veerappan ended triumphant, and she agreed that if she didn’t let the boy run around with the other children, his skin would never grow tough like his father’s. So Neera was allowed to play and Vayshnavia had more time to slap Veerappan when he got out of hand.

    Chapter 9. The Sky Is Black
    It was five years after Neera’s birth. Veerappan was sharpening his police knives when he saw a group of the tribe’s children come to an abrupt halt in front of him. They laid the boy Padavanis in front of him. Veerappan waited but when none of them spoke he lunged at them with one of the knives. A little girl spoke up, "They have taken Neera, and Padavanis has died defending him." She cringed and looked at the ground as she continued. "They say that if you do what the Big Brahmin says, they will give him back. The Big Brahmin said to tell you that he is the son of your… your… master." This last word cut short the storm of energy inside of Veerappan. It gave him a pain deep in his stomach. It put drops of salt-water in his eyes. It took away his smile.
    * * *

    Veerappan and Vayshnavia stayed in their hut for weeks. Nobody knew what was going to happen. The children left food and herbs outside of their closed door, but it only helped the village animals grow fatter. Every few hours a horrible cry would escape the elephant bone house, making the whole tribe shutter. No one knew which of the two belonged to that cry.

    Finally after three weeks Vayshnavia emerged like a shadow from the white bone house. She said, "The sky has turned black, we will do as the Brahmin has asked."

    Chapter 10. Knots
    The Big Brahmin had been trying to hire Veerappan for a long time. They had offered money and fame. At times Veerappan had thought of capitulating but Vayshnavia was always quick to remind him how the Brahmins had not hesitated to wipe their behinds with his over-worked hands. They wanted Veerappan to kidnap the famous actor Rajkamur, who had been a sudra. Vayshnavia knew that it would be just another way for the Brahmins to hold razors to the eyes of the lower castes, thus preventing them from seeing their own pride. It would remove Rajkamur from the public eye so that he could be forgotten and at the same time Veerappan, who had been an untouchable, would be hated. But what really knotted Vayshnavia’s insides was the possibility that if Veerappan began to work for the Big Brahmin he would fall back into the spell of Shame he had broken when he had killed his master. Vayshnavia knew how weak her Veerappan could be, but she could not risk the life of her son.

    Chapter 11. The Spell
    And thus Rajkamur was kidnapped, Neera was returned and Vayshnavia’s gut was beyond knotting. The Brahmins enticed Veerappan with their suits made of pure gold and their ruby studded canes. So after he had kidnapped Rajkamur, he continued to work for the Brahmins and stopped taking care of his tribe. No more beautiful weddings, no more singing, and no more laughing. This was the Spell of shame.

    Chapter 12. The Answer
    The tribe reminded Rajkamur of his family. He had forgotten how having nothing could intensify the feeling of love and camaraderie in a family. How they had lacked for bread but never for a warm embrace and a sharing of Varusha. It pained him to see how things were changing for the tribe. Now that Veerappan was under the Spell, people were getting greedier, the children were getting skinnier and Varusha was in shorter supply. So, in an attempt to call the gods, Rajkamur decided to deny himself of all earthly delights until an answer came to him.

    However, with the heart condition he had had since he was a child because of malnutrition, he was not strong enough for such a feat and died in meditation.

    Chapter 13. Shiny Stones
    The sky only blackened and blackened. The children were starving and the men were looking for happiness in the arms of other women, a practice that Vayshnavia had never approved of. The houses fell in disrepair and the whole time Veerappan was busy pleasing the Brahmins in order to get his hands on some shiny stones that did nothing to feed babies or satisfy women. The few times that he did return home, he would stay inside, counting all his treasure. All this was what had made Vayshnavia cry so hoarsely when Grace was looking down on the earth.

    In Veerappan’s eyes Grace saw the same blank greediness as she had seen in her landlady’s eyes. She saw in the tribe the same fear she had felt at the thought of being thrust into the streets, at an age where she could no longer afford to be taken advantage of. And so, understanding the tribe’s fear, Grace had given up the idea of rest and decided to return to earth.

    Chapter 14. Grace Vayshnavia
    Armed with a new spirit and calling herself Grace Vayshnavia, she went to Veerappan as he was counting his jewels. She kicked him back, gathered he cold stones and threw them out the door where all the children went to collect them. When Veerappan tried to run out to retrieve them she stood at the entrance. Her feet were like roots planted into the ground. Veerappan knew that he would never get around her. Vayshnavia directed her piercing gaze toward Veerappan, as she had not been able to do in a long time. Veerappan tried to avert his eyes but Vayshnavia took out her knife, held it to his throat and spit her words into his face, "You have brought our tribe the worst illness. You have brought us shame. You lap up the Brahmin jewels like the lowliest dog, while your family is starving. If you truly believe that you are a dog with no name and no home then I will treat you like one. I will cut you into little pieces and I will feed you to my starving son!"

    Veerappan remembered the animal he had seen in the window many years ago and again felt a rage so powerful that it made his heart shudder. He took the knife from Vayshnavia and killed his second shame by killing his second master.
    * * *

    Chapter 15. Healthy Cheeks
    It was when Grace’s spirit entered Vayshnavia that she gained the strength to take away the Spell of shame. Only then could Veerappan go back to caring for his tribe. And that’s why you, my little one, are so healthy, why your cheeks are plump and your hair grows quickly. Now hurry and get dressed for we must go pay homage to Grace’s spirit for she will be moving on to another body. Never forget what I have told you, a woman’s spirit never dies.

    Footnotes
    1. Little Brahmin: A young boy of the Brahmin (i.e. priest) caste
    2. Brahma: God in Hinduism
    3. Sudra: Lowest Caste, above Untouchable
    4. Varusha: Strong alcoholic beverage
    5. Gadje: Outsider

    Tags
  • DON'T BLAME THE POOR FOR POVERTY: An editorial

    09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
    Original Author
    root
    Original Body

    by PEOPLE'S TRIBUNE/TRIBUNO DEL PUEBLO

    Our country prides itself in providing its citizens with equal
    fundamental rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. History
    shows that these fundamental rights have been and continue to be
    compromised. In many cases they were compromised under the
    assumption that people of color were not equals, and today we see
    a distinct fissure between the haves and have-nots -- those that
    can afford to have rights, and those that simply can't afford
    them. The U.S. Supreme Court's unanimous decision on March 26,
    2002, confirming that tenants residing in public housing will be
    evicted if anyone in their household, a guest, or other person
    under their control engages in any illegal drug-related
    activities, is a prime example of this unfair "selectivity of
    rights."

    The Supreme Court ruling came in response to a combination of
    cases in which tenants were evicted because someone else in their
    household was involved in drug activities. One of the cases
    involves 63-year-old Barbara Hill and 71-year-old Willy Lee, who
    have been in public housing for over two decades, and whose
    grandsons were caught smoking marijuana in the parking lot of
    their apartment. Another involves a 63-year-old woman, Pearle
    Rucker, whose mentally disabled daughter was caught with drugs
    fairly near the Oakland housing project they resided in. Rucker
    argues that she never observed any drug use on behalf of her
    daughter. Lastly, the fourth case involves Herman Walker, a
    disabled 71-year-old man, whose caretaker and guests were found in
    the possession of cocaine in Walker's apartment. Although Walker
    fired the caretaker, he was still given an eviction notice.

    All of the tenants above were sent to the Oakland streets
    regardless of their age, circumstances, or lack of knowledge that
    the person who they were responsible for was engaged in drug-
    related activities. Many of the tenants had lived in public
    housing for years; how could they possibly afford anything else?
    Rents aren't getting any lower. The Just Cause Coalition in
    Oakland reported that rents in Oakland have increased 25 percent
    in 2001 alone. In 1998 there were 84,000 low-income renters, but
    only 36,000 low-income rental units. Public housing is therefore
    essential for many families that qualify. In order to qualify for
    public housing in Oakland, residents cannot make more than 30
    percent of the city's family median income. Currently, most people
    living in public housing are single mothers with two or more
    children, senior citizens, and disabled people.

    Hence, we come to an irrefutable contradiction. During President
    Roosevelt's era and his analysis of the country's poor, the
    "culture of poverty" was deemed to be an individual issue. The
    whole philosophy of "blame the individual," began to saturate
    American minds. If you were poor, it was because you weren't
    working hard enough; you were lazy or perhaps incapable or
    unwilling to compete. The assumption was that capitalism provided
    everyone with tools for prosperity, and if you were poor it was
    simply your choice. And Americans believed it. They still believe
    it. And they will continue to believe it, unless we begin to
    disclose the truth. The truth is that the number of poor continues
    to grow at an exponential rate. We are all human beings that want
    to live well, want our children fed, and want to live life to the
    fullest. The second reality is that in our country you have to be
    able to afford it all. If you can't afford it, then you lack the
    basic necessities for survival. First the poor are accountable for
    themselves. Now they're not only accountable for themselves, but
    they are responsible for others as well. How is that just? So if
    the poor are responsible for those that reside in their apartment,
    then who's responsible for the poor that reside in the United
    States? When is our government going to be held accountable for
    our poor, homeless, elderly, and handicapped?

    It's not really about ridding our communities of drugs. If that
    were really the issue, Congress would be focusing on the
    millionaires who can afford to produce the drug, smuggle it into
    the U.S., and whose middle men bring it into our poor communities.
    They are the true criminals, and who ironically would never find
    themselves in the position that public housing tenants are in. Why
    not focus on the root of the problem? It's all a scapegoat.
    Throwing people out on the street will not solve anything. It will
    only increase the number of homeless we have on our streets, the
    number of ill and malnourished, and the number of neglected
    Americans. The U.S. Supreme Court decision is an attack on the
    poor. When can they ever strive for prosperity if they're
    constantly bombarded with laws that strip them of their civil
    liberties? The new class of poor is growing, and as Congress
    attempts to disperse them, they are going nowhere. They will be on
    park benches, on street corners, under trees, and if they're lucky
    they will be working at fast food joints, serving coffee, cleaning
    buildings, bringing your groceries, building, painting, selling
    ... enough to survive.

    The means exist to end poverty. But we are going to have to fight
    for a new system -- one that does not blame the poor for their
    poverty.

    ******************************************************************

    This article originated in the PEOPLE'S TRIBUNE/TRIBUNO DEL PUEBLO
    (Online Edition), Vol. 29 No. 5/ May, 2002; P.O. Box 3524,
    Chicago, IL 60654; Email: pt@lrna.org; http://www.lrna.org
    Feel free to reproduce and use unless marked as copyrighted. The
    PEOPLE'S TRIBUNE/TRIBUNO DEL PUEBLO depends on donations from its
    readers. To subscribe, send email to majordomo@gocatgo.com with a
    message of "subscribe pt-dist". To unsubscribe, send email to
    majordomo@gocatgo.com with a message of "unsubscribe pt-dist"
    ******************************************************************

    Tags
  • Crime: Dying While Latino

    09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
    Original Author
    root
    Original Body

    by Alex Cuff/PNN News Brief Editor

    For over a year the body of Armando Chapal Ramirez lay forgotten, by hospital staff, and decaying in the morgue at Robert F. Kennedy Medical Center in Hawthorne. Armando’s family had certainly not forgotten him. The hospital, "had him there the whole time down there. Meanwhile, we were suffering day and night, waiting for the worst," said Ramirez’s father, Jesus, 45, a stock clerk in Gardena.

    After a family barbecue on September 30, 2001, Ramirez who had an addiction and would go on binges for two or three days every month or so, slipped out of the house unnoticed. When he didn’t return, his parents began driving around the neighborhood inquiring with several area hospitals, store owners, friends, and neighbors. Jesus then filed a missing-person report with the police.

    Ramirez was brought into the emergency room at Robert F. Kennedy Medical Center on October 1, 2001. He had pneumonia in his right lung and suffered kidney and liver failure. He was reported dead on October 9th and his body moved to the hospital morgue. Standard operating procedure is to call a law enforcement agency and ask them to take a death report which then generates a report to the coroner’s office. This was never done in Ramirez’s case.

    Douglas Shaffer, the family’s attorney described the event as "the height of incompetence and neglect." When the family first got the call, they thought Armando had just died. They had been searching desperately for 11 months. "It was a great horror," his mother cried, "I’d never expect that a hospital would just keep a young man all alone like that."

    Tags
  • Alchemist's Good & Evil. Nib of an idea.

    09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
    Original Author
    root
    Original Body

    Too late to begin
    column this is a tease folks.

    by Joe B.

    Well, almost Easter, Mother Mary, Mary Madeline, the Apostles, and Jesus resurrected.

    Heady thoughts to be sure but as usual mines turned to those first pre chemists that may have died breathing in mercury fumes or blowing themselves up in accidents.

    What would a modern Alchemist be today?
    Answer: A Molecular Nuclear Physicist working with molecules that make up the atoms that's part of all living or inorganic material.

    I might night not have time to think this through so folks have a safe and exciting Easter.

    Meanwhile I must get out of the city and visit family before returning and I’ll finish my long thoughts on Alchemy, Alchemists, and the good and evil of it.

    See you all and stay alive don’t do no stupid bull moves guys, young men, young wimin. Bye…

    Please send donations to

    Poor Magazine or in C/0

    Ask Joe at 1448 Pine Street,

    San Francisco, CA. 94103 USA

    For Joe only my snail mail:

    1230 Market St.

    PO Box #645

    San Francisco, CA 94102


    Email: askjoe@poormagazine.org

    Tags
  • A New Ooze, Red, White, and True Blue... Is He?

    09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
    Original Author
    root
    Original Body

    Green, gray, or clear whatever.

    Is Mr. Sup.Gavin Newsome the flavor
    of 2004 ..

    The latest prepackage version of
    what's the word that rhymes with time,
    crime, grime or lime it begins with an
    S but I forgot.

    by Joe B.

    Who is Mr. Gavin Newsom?

    Where does he come from?
    Who or whom are his friends, business contacts, former girlfriends?

    And why is it so important for him to be mayor in 2004?
    Why the rush of his "Cash Not Care" on the ballot?

    I really don’t know about him, don’t care all that much but if he’s gonna improve or muck up my or other people’s lives then a few things should be known about him.

    Handsome, charismatic, from a powerful dynasty and that’s it.

    Some of you folks know the real dope on the guy as he’s send out feelers, trial balloons for a possible run for City Hall’s top spot the same should be for him.

    There is more of you readers out there that know bits and pieces of his life talk to each other tie them together and the whole story will be known long before the day of election.

    Good, guy, bad guy, dull, or mundane either way it is only fair we know about him as he assumes he knows about the houseless, working poor families, or individuals.

    That’s a fair deal and it seems more than Sup. Gavin Newson is doing.

    My next column will be on how this Newsom guy can really help if his plan was more innovative, creative, and imaginative than what he’s borrowed from Alpha City.

    Yes, readers may have to wait a day or two for what I have to write but all you have to do is read it; its me, the poor boob that has to think and write the stuff up… Bye.

    HouseCare-Pro Price range:
    $25 per day or 100 a week for
    1 bdrm. Apt, small House.
    4 to 3 bedrooms, $50 to $100 a week,
    $5,000 a week for 20 to 40 rm. Homes.
    $25,000 by the week or $100,000 for
    50 to 100 rm Mansions
    Prices are negotiable.
    Non drinker, smoker, drugs (unless its aspirin & vitamins)
    Not a party animal, Boredom, works me.

    For Joe only my snail mail:
    PO Box 1230 #645
    Market St. San Francisco, CA 94102
    Email: askjoe@poormagazine.org

    Tags
  • Consent? Search? ....

    09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
    Original Author
    root
    Original Body

    Police Commission hearing is held on so-called "consent to search" policy

     

     
     

    by Alex Cuff/ PoorNewsNetwork Community Journalist

    Room 551 at 850 Bryant Street was filling up when I arrived for the Police Commission meeting this past Tuesday,
    January 8th. Before it began we all stood to go through the motion of pledging allegiance to the amerikan flag. (I
    was amused later on to look at the official meeting agenda and see that the Pledge of Allegiance was actually the
    first item.) The reason I was there was to cover the scheduled hearing regarding the banning of SFPD practice of
    consent searches. I was ready for a comprehensive report from those who are advocating the ban and accounts of folk
    who have been victims of racial profiling. What I got was almost 2 hours of police-affiliated speeches on the
    necessity and constitutionality of consent searches and less than an hour of personal accounts where folks have been
    victims of consent searches.

    A consent search is when police officers ask permission to search an individual, or the belongings of an individual, in the
    absence of probable cause. Although people have the absolute right to refuse, most of us don’t know we have that right. Data
    collected by the SFPD shows that the practice of consent search is used twice as often against African Americans as whites and
    that the searches usually don’t find anything. According to an ACLU report on stops and searches of motorists titled "A
    Department in Denial - The San Francisco Police Department’s Failure to Address Racial Profiling" the SFPD is failing to take
    the issue of racial profiling seriously. The author of the report Mark Schlosberg, who was present at Tuesday’s meeting, states
    "The department’s consistent failure shows the need for a clear policy prohibiting racial profiling and an independent auditor to
    oversee the data collection program."

    The first speaker to address this report claims "we didn’t see racial profiling as an issue until we saw a report. The data we
    have is clearly flawed...We need to work to change the perception because racial profiling isn’t a part of the SFPD." He assured
    us that by June 2004, all SFPD officers would have received racial profiling training. He said that the proof of racial profiling in
    the report is flawed due to "statistical problems" or a problem of "technology."

    Although it’s nothing new, I am always terribly dumbfounded that individuals and organizations that devote their entirety
    to a specific topic such as police brutality, homelessness or mental health issues are not paid any mind by the state when it
    comes to a remedy for the proposed problem. A great example is the Care Not Cash campaign victory over folks who knew the
    "care" wasn’t there and who are veterans of poverty and homeless advocacy such as the Coalition on Homelessness and Poor
    Magazine. So there we all sat for almost 2 hours while the SFPD took up our time and the Police Commission’s time defending
    consent searches and the US Constitution while those who had experienced the intimidation and injustice of these unwarranted
    searches, were given 3 minutes each to speak sometime around 7:30pm.

    I was sitting next to Gregg Lowder, the Director of the Mayor’s Office of Criminal Justice. The entire time before he went up
    to speak, he was pouring over a document filled with so many red marks and scribbled out sentences that it looked like
    anyone’s
    worst nightmare of a graded paper. At the podium, he claimed that a consent search is a sound strategy for criminal
    investigations because it is a psychological strategy that catches those who are guilty. He pointed out that a guilty person
    thinks differently than someone who is not guilty so they consent to a proposed search. According to Mr. Lowder, a guilty
    person will a) think they are too clever to be caught and consent or b) figure they are already caught and will win favor with the
    police for cooperating.

    Lowder apparently believes that in most cases of consent searches, the police are not using intimidation, threats (verbal
    or with drawn guns) or other forms of coerciveness such as telling a victim that a warrant is on its way. He did though relate
    that "the mayor is aware of this problem – nobody tolerates racial profiling, racism, certainly not in the police department." He
    went on to say that the stats are wrong since the police didn’t collect the data they were supposed to and that "the mayor is
    concerned about inaccurate numbers." We were told that a leading authority in this area, from Harvard…I’ll stop right there and
    say, Who gives a shit what an academic from Harvard has to say about the relationship between the SFPD and the men,
    women and children who are being targeted by them, in their own neighborhoods, as criminals? Stay in Cambridge with your
    analysis – we are trying to address local topics such as the military-esque intervention of a fight in a Bayview Hunter’s Point
    high school or the epidemic of youth who are sleeping in their cars due to HUD’s One Strike policy. These
    issues are not quantifiable especially by ivy league numbers - they have to do with accountability of police practices
    in SF and of oppressive policy effecting the poor, people of color, and disabled persons and youth.

    Another SFPD affiliate remarked that consent searches are embedded in our law and social systems – we learn from our
    parents that if we want something, we ask politely for it - which is what the police are doing when they seek compliance for a
    consent search. When it was finally time for those who are trying to get consent searches banned to speak (the same persons
    who actually asked for this hearing to take place) it was 2 hours since the meeting had begun.

    Mark Schlosberg was given 5 minutes and it was said that each additional citizen that wanted to make a public comment,
    would be given 3 minutes! Schlosberg began by pointing out that after an hour and a half, he probably wouldn’t be able to
    respond to the pro-consent search rally in 5 minutes. He responded to SFPD’s "wrong stats" excuse by admitting that the
    "unreporting" doesn’t invalidate the ACLU report but that it could be worse! He pointed out that we don’t have the data from
    those officers who didn’t do what they were supposed to do. He also talked to the fact that among the persons who spoke
    earlier about consent searches, some said they are used a lot; others said they are hardly used. He proposed that both of
    those claims couldn’t be right…who could argue that?

    "Plug the biggest loophole in the 4th Amendment – consent searches." These words came from our own Public Defender,
    Jeff Adachi, who went on to say that if he had a dollar for every police report which said that the accused consented when the
    accused denied the consent, he would be a very rich man. He said the 3 problems with consent searches are 1) most people
    don’t know their rights 2) it’s a coercive environment (being stopped by the police) 3) it is ineffective – less than 10% of
    consent searches result in finding anything.

    Now the line of citizens waiting to speak their mind about consent searches filled the room and poured into the brightly lit
    hallway. Ishmael Tarik of the Bay Area Police Watch, a project of the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights, took part of his 3
    minutes to tell the overcrowded hearing room a story: The story was about Mr. Lies who was naked, and Mr. Truth who was
    clothed. Mr. Lies steals Mr. Truth’s clothes while Mr. Truth is asleep. Mr. Truth who is now naked chases Mr. Lies around town.
    The moral of the story is: When you see Lies, you’ll soon see the Naked Truth. After the amusing and palpable anecdote,
    Ishmael’s clear voice of reason related that consent searches are inherently coercive – to everyday citizens who unfortunately
    don’t know their rights (as I surely didn’t when the cops busted into my apartment and scared the shit out of me), a search is
    clearly an affront.

    Quentin Adams, an African American network engineer and SF resident, told his story of being stopped by 2 officers for
    stepping off of the sidewalk and then back onto the sidewalk when the light was red. I can’t even count how many times I’ve
    "jayed" all over town in the presence of passing police vehicles. I’ve never been confronted like Quentin was: he was asked if
    he was on parole, if he had any sharp objects on him, he was patted down, asked for ID. They found nothing on him but he
    was given a citation.

    When he asked how much the ticket would be, one of the officers replied that the fine for running a red light is $170. The
    only other interaction Quentin has had in the past with the police is through the check he sends each year in support of the
    Police Activities League. Before he stepped away from the podium he commented that he doesn’t want to vilify the SFPD but
    there seems to be a problem with racial profiling when a "computer geek gets stopped and frisked on the street."

    A white woman came up and testified that while driving home she saw several police cars pulled over and they had 5 or 6
    youth cuffed against a wall near 3rd Street. She pulled over to see what the problem was and learned that the cops found
    nothing on the kids. Another time while at home, she heard sirens and saw lights outside of her house. Someone had been
    pulled over. The cars were blocking another woman’s car who was yelling that she had to get around because her children were
    home with a babysitter who was due to leave. The cops pulled her out of her car too. After the officers released both of the
    victims she heard one say "It’s not even worth writing up but I don’t feel like getting yelled at." She commented that the
    police actions are demoralizing for the youth in the city and although the police have no problem harassing the kids, she
    knows of actual shootings that aren’t even investigated.

    Although a ban on consent searches won’t eradicate the racism and classism that infects our criminal justice system and
    fills our prisons, it is a start to prohibit racial profiling by law enforcement. I didn’t know that we have the right to say no to
    police. If you are asked for consent to be searched, remember you have the right to say no! If you do consent, keep the
    following in mind: the request for consent must be uncontaminated with duress or coerced stress; once consent is given, it can
    be withdrawn; you can consent to only certain areas of a house or car – for example, you can search the car but not the trunk,
    etc.

     

    Tags
  • Good/Bad Alchemist's Cont. I'm Expressing My Freedom Of Speach.

    09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
    Original Author
    root
    Original Body

    Joe, do 'ya think
    you have too much time
    on your hands?

    No, not nearly enough...

    But it beats being Mesmerized
    by TV, Oil War.

    by Joe B.

    Where was I? Oh, yes-good or bad Alchemists.

    Before and during Easter and Spring Break vacation besides the Lord’s crucifixion and resurrection it also got me thinking about exact opposites of good and evil.

    As children most of us were told and literally scared into believing that both God, Satan, Saints, and Angels existed and an eternal battle for our priceless human souls and not to sell or barter it at all but if we did be aware once sold rarely will we get it back!

    On those lines a thought pops into my brain.

    If minions of demons are Satan’s to command then Alchemist’s are under spiritual command of God.

    If a few demons wish to be good then why not the same hold true for accomplished enlightened Alchemist’s who’ve achieved the great work.

    If demons or mythical Vampires fighting their evil side and brethren, sister’s wouldn’t alchemist with dark sides also turn?

    Yes, avoiding so called war talk, a macabre empty victory dance over in Iraq’s blood soaked oil and sand while scientist’s, researchers, brightest students around this globe find hydrogen and other alternative renewable energy sources beyond dead decomposed dinosaurs.

    Back to God’s few but powerful soldiers.

    I know most Alchemist’s were long suffering men and women seeking portents or signs in astrology, numerology, even the Cabala. Some use pure primitive science.

    For the majority death by explosion or suffocation from mercury gases or other fumes.

    Those surviving, testing the, lead/brass into gold and succeeding found after taking a terrifying drink of what could’ve been poison gagged a little and found them selves not only alive but changing in ways they never imagined!

    Their minds afire with there own past lives confronting them, everything they ever saw, felt, heard, learned, supposedly forgotten, all the joys, hurts, pains, physical/mental flash immediate all clear crisp as their whole being expands.

    Not only that but voices of living or long dead friends, lovers, surround them, other alchemists, and cutting through it all God’s voice and vision both female/male telling you "Careful Child; Sit, Rest, Do Nothing But Relax - The Changes Will Take A Few Moments And Only When I Say Its Time Explore Your Being."

    What does on do when hearing God’s command for one to rest, relax, pause, as your body, mind, spirit changes?

    You do as the Lord says as you change from mortal to a being if not eternal but closer to immortality than most mortals will ever be.

    Days, hours, months, or years however long it takes you rest as commanded as your powers are slowly revealed to you.

    After this long rest where you might have to isolate from others the real adventures begin as death is less an adversary more an annoyance there are plan: long range plans you have to rethink everything because your life span is so long you cannot see its end which is still disconcerting if not downright frightening.

    The mysterious alchemist Fulcanellie and Nandita (Mohuya Mellamphy) comes to mind.From www.alchymie. net/english_version/critiques/fucanelli_uk_.htm. You folks will find a title there too.

    If they both drank from it a man’s virility is restored and for women besides youth they become prolific who knows how may children came from them or if they decided to stay a physical loving twosome without progeny.

    After a long rest what happens? That’s another thought for another day… Bye.

    Please send donations to

    Poor Magazine or in C/0

    Ask Joe at 1448 Pine Street,

    San Francisco, CA. 94103 USA

    For Joe only my snail mail:

    1230 Market St.

    PO Box #645

    San Francisco, CA 94102


    Email: askjoe@poormagazine.org

    Tags
  • Is This The New Face Of Politics? If He is, Man we're all in for some deep S--t*

    09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
    Original Author
    root
    Original Body

    A Kennedyesque Knock off does
    a reverse Robin Hood.

    Steals from 'po folk gives to
    whom?

    by Joe B.

    First I though of call it
    Gavin Don't Give But Loves taking Away-but 'naaah.

    "No Care" Newsom"


    is the short-sweet title.

    I’m not saying it takes a lot be a Kennedy it does the problem is it takes more than a member of a family dynasty, running for office, or making memorable speeches.

    It takes going against public opinion, friends, and family to do what one knows is right, decent, and lawful.

    The unjust laws are fought until they are corrected takes sacrifice and inner fortitude weathering ideological storms.

    Shining new-penny-Newsom looks every bit the part of hero-knight for a brand new 21st century minus a war, jail time which can be an asset if it was in protest against unjust situations that required civil disobedience.

    Sup. Gavin’s Newsom’s "Cash-less Society for houseless and working poor would work if...

    "There Were Enough Shelter’s That Were Safely Run That Homeless, Working Poor People Single or Families Could Trust and Case Management.

    This "No-cash because they’ll spend it on drugs and alcohol" is a bunch of cowchips and stinks to high heaven.

    First of all the population has changed drastically, and though many see poor folks on the streets, in alleys, doorways the vast majority are working at low wage jobs or on work-fare which means they work 20 or less hours a week for a check.

    Did you know all work-fare workers sign a contract and if not should be equal to salaried workers?

    There was a time not to long ago workfare folk were not considered but the POWER workers People Organized to Win Employment Rights tried to fix some of that.

    Now Newsom in an agenda driven, cynical political power politics is using New York’s supposedly model to "help poor folks" get to work.

    "If the Cost Of Living kept up with the economic the people working years ago would still be working not out on the street out of a job, and working two-three minimum wage jobs aint cutting it anywhere in America.

    Its not completely useless this plan Newsom has all it needs is a little high tech tweaking, but for right now it’ll create more homeless persons and families.

    Meanwhile Newsom’s Kennedy - mask is askew.

    I’ve not met a Kennedy yet, maybe I never will but what Mr. (I mean)Supervisor Gavin Newsom’s pet project to propel him into the Mayor’s throne is as anti-Kennedy as one can get, while the K’s fight to spread freedom internationally.

    Newsom’s looks to take from the very people with less curtailing and criminalizing and blamed for the economic slump, low tourism turnout.

    When all of us know larger things have happened than sleeping and peeing in public though if most of the empty houses, warehouses, and newly constructed office buildings were turned to shelters with kitchens, medical/psychological help and Job/Skills also career centers instead of take-shake down-poor folk-rip off of funds and not guaranteed to go to Non Profits services that help the poor.

    All this for stealth runs for Mayor.

    Why not use his own money or is it easier to take from people already with little money as it is for a grab-all-you can campaign.

    I wonder, if I was a rich guy or woman and either made my millions by hard eared work or had a trust fund to live on.

    If I do nothing but lay around pools, ski in Switzerland, or do nothing am I a bum?

    Because one has no money problems am I a bum?

    On the other hand if I have no dough, live on the street, live free in a shelter am I a bum?

    If I’m on work-fare earning my e two checks on the 1st and the 15th of the month or the once a month $279 check am I still a bum?

    Rich folks I believe know the answer to having money, enjoying it and doing nothing especially if their parents or other relatives gave it to them.

    I’d like to know the difference of being a poor bum and being a rich one. Bye…

    Tags

Latest

test