2016

  • Interview with a Buffalo in Golden Gate Park

    09/24/2021 - 07:17 by Anonymous (not verified)
    Original Author
    PNNscholar1
    Original Body

    When I was a kid, my father would make me sit with him and watch old western movies on TV.  Those movies would be aired in the afternoon—cowboys on horses shooting at things—cowboys, stagecoaches, whiskey bottles—and, of course, Indians.  I looked more like an Indian than a cowboy and my dad would sit, his attention, his mind, his spirit inhabiting each scene, as if he’d been on horseback with a six shooter firing into the expanse of sky as the wild prickly cacti bore witness.  I’d see horses, badges, tumbleweed and gamblers on our little TV set but there was one thing I never saw—buffalo.  “Oh give me a home, where the buffalo roam…” the song went.  Where were the buffalo?

     

    All those classic westerns those afternoons with the old man and not a single buffalo, not even a mound of buffalo shit on the silver screen. There has to be a buffalo, one hanging around somewhere I thought.  So one day I left and went looking for one.  I get lost all the time—I have no sense of direction, especially if someone gives me directions.  If I’m told to turn left, I will turn right.  I found myself in Golden Gate Park—how I got there, I don’t know—I just put one foot in front of the other, my mind guiding me in a daydream without direction.  It was at Golden Gate Park that I came upon buffalo—4 or 5 of them, fenced in.  I stood outside the fence gazing at them. They stood chewing as the sky above seemed to move. 

     

    I called out, “Hey buffalo” but they ignored me.  Hey buffalo, I said again.  “Get lost, kid” a voice called out.  I looked at their skin, a burnt brown with patches of wooly growth.  I stayed for an hour before going back home where my father was still watching that old western.  I am all grown up now, a reporter for Poor News Network (PNN). I still live in San Francisco but many people I grew up with are no longer here.  I recently visited Golden Gate Park to seek an interview with one or more of the buffalo in their refuge called the Golden Gate Park Buffalo Paddock.  It was my sincere hope to learn of their feelings about the city, about life; and, it was my hope that I wouldn’t be told to get lost.

     

    PNN: Hey buffalo!

    Buffalo: I thought I told you to get lost

    PNN: That was you?

    Buffalo: I might be a buffalo, but I got the memory of an elephant.  I never forget a face.  So, are you still watching those lousy western movies?

    PNN: No, that was a long time ago

    Buffalo: All lies anyway.  So many buffalo killed.

    PNN: What have you been up to?

    Buffalo:  I’ve been here, on the land.  The land has always been here.  People change, come and go, but the land is here.  But i'm worried, the way it's going out here, I hope I don't get evicted. I even had one goofy son of a bitch that came around the other day.  He asked if I was renting this place as a short term rental.  Short term rental?  Shit, these folks just got here yesterday and they're asking me if I'm living in a short term rental.  Then he told me that i could make some bread by listing this place on some shit called Airbnb.  I told him, I don't need no airbnb because the air I breathe is good and I can shit whereever I damn well please.  But the guy kept hanging around being a pain in the ass.  Home on the motherfuckin' range ain't what it used to be, i guess.

    PNN: What’s changed in the city?

    Buffalo: Well, who are all those goofy motherfuckers with beards running all over the place?  They all look like General Custard.

    PNN: You mean Custer?

    Buffalo: Custer, Custard—What difference does it make?  Someone should airlift some razorblades and drop ‘em.  All them beards running around like something out of burning man.  To me it’s a bunch of burning bullshit. 

    PNN: They come around a lot?

    Buffalo: yeah, standing by the fence, trying to get my attention, snapping pictures on their little phones.  They’re like flies landing on the ass of a warthog, swarms of them.  You just want to swat them.  I tell you brother, if this fence wasn’t here…

    PNN: You ever try to escape?

    Buffalo: I did, years ago.  But I ain’t no kid no more.  If I tried that now they’d call the cops and that would be my ass.

    PNN: the cops are out of control

    Buffalo: Damn right they are.  What they did to that kid Mario Woods was a damn shame.  It was an execution.  They need to fire the police Chief, what's his name, Slur?

    PNN: I think it's Suhr

    Buffalo: Well, i sure as hell ain't calling him sir.  And what's the Mayor doing?  He's pullin' a wizard of oz.  We'd do better with all-you-can-eat Shrimp Boy, he'd at least set us up with a little cheese bread, which is a helluva lot more than we get out of this mayor.  And I heard about something called text messages that the cops were sending on their cell phones with a lot of racist stuff on it.  Oh yeah, Slurs.  But I ain't in to cell phones...they're out of my range.  But yes, the chief, aesthetically he ain't lookin' too good.  Resembles head cheese under a heat lamp.  But yeah, the cops are off the hook.

    PNN: How did you hear about it?

    Buffalo: I get the paper.  Some of these old guys drop it off during their morning walks.  But I was reading about it.  5 cops shot that brother. That was wrong, just like they did Alex Nieto.  But you know, they been shooting at us forever.  So many buffalo slaughtered.  So many brothers shot.  Soon there will be no more brothers or sisters left in the city. 

    PNN: The black population is 3% in the city now

    Buffalo: Damn shame.  I’ve seen it.  A lot of brothers used to come out here and we’d talk.  Them guys were cool.  One of ‘em used to say, “Everything is everything”.

    PNN: I’ve heard that one too

    Buffalo: It’s true, everything is everything. We are connected to each other, to air and sky and water.  Problem is that you got folks that think everything is theirs.

    PNN: Everything’s everything?

    Buffalo: Everything is everything

    PNN: Any last words?

    Buffalo: Yeah…custer can kiss my ass

     

     

    © 2016 Tony Robles

    Tags
  • Book Review: “The political Legacy of Malcolm X” / Notes From the Inside

    09/24/2021 - 07:17 by Anonymous (not verified)
    Original Author
    Tiny
    Original Body

    Editor's Note: Editors Note: Jose Villarreal is one of several power-FUL PNNPlantation prison correspondents. As currently and formerly incarcerated poor and indigenous peoples in struggle and resistance with all plantation systems in Amerikkka, POOR Magazine stands in solidarity with all folks on the other side of the razor wire plantation. 

    “The political Legacy of Malcolm X” by Oba T’ Shaka, Third World Press, $11.95

    This book attempts to give another analysis of Malcolm’s theory. Here we read of Malcolm X the revolutionary. Many other books focus on his upbringing or his religious nature, but this book teaches us of his political side.

    As a prisoner, I have always drawn strength from Malcolm X, who, like myself, also developed consciously in U.S. prisons. Like so many, I also used these pintas to study and learn from my own history and this drew me to Chican@ revolt. It was the extreme repression of California’s control units which enabled my consciousness to rise up in resistance. Malcolm X’s story is one being reborn many times over in dungeons throughout the U.S.

    On page 29 we read of Malcolm’s psychological transformations. Like so many today, Malcolm X went from Malcolm to Lumpen street hustler to Malcolm X the revolutionary. This transformation was brought out by learning from history and what his role was under Amerikkka. He not only fully grasped that role which Amerikkka played in keeping the oppressed thoroughly disoriented, but he laid it out for others to also learn from. On page 32-33, he is quoted as stating…” one of the best ways to safeguard yourself from being deceived is always to from the habit of looking at things for yourself, thinking for yourself, before you try and come to any judgement. Never base your impression of someone on what someone else has said or upon what someone else has written. Never base your judgement on things like that. Especially in this kind of country and in this kind of society which has mastered the art of very deceitfully painting people whom they don’t like in an image that they know you won’t like. So we end up hating our friends and loving our enemies” (1).

    This is what I enjoyed about this book, rather than focus on the trivial aspects of Malcolm X’s life, the author concentrates Malcolm’s political contributions for all of those struggling against the oppressor nation. In the above passage, Malcolm highlights how deceitful and crafty our oppressor is and how they have many out of touch with reality and manipulated to the point that some folks love the enemy and hate the people. This is what I mean by Malcolm having a deep understanding of Amerikkka and its foulness.

    Many today, especially amongst the Black bourgeoisie, attempt to kidnap Malcolm’s legacy and paint him erroneously, particularly when it comes to Black nationalism. The author reminds us of what Malcolm X thought of Black nationalism where on page 36, Malcolm is quoted as saying it is t” the type of ingredient necessary to fuse or ignite the entire Black community”. This is a truth which applies to all oppressed peoples. Indeed even within Aztlan Chican@ nationalism will be what ignites the entire Chican@ nation. In today’s social reality in U.S. borders revolutionary nationalism of the oppressed is the correct method to propel us forward under today’s conditions.

    Another thing that I enjoyed about this book was how the author put revolutionary nationalism in its proper context. Many have said towards the end that Malcolm had moved away from nationalism and into internationalism. But as the author states on page 107 “Malcolm was not changing from Nationalism to internationalism, he was simply linking up African nationalism in America with African nationalism in Africa”.

    I believe that Malcolm did begin to see that the Black struggle in the U.S. was linked to that of Africa. As a Chicano I also see that the Chican@ struggle is linked to the struggle in Mexico. Our efforts ultimately are aimed at capitalism-imperialism which works to sabotage our liberation at every turn. For Chican@s revolutionary nationalism is our path forward to the day when Chican@s can decide whether we build a Chican@ nation or remerge to a future liberated Socialist Mexico.

    White Marxists nationally and internationally, could not tolerate the existence of a base outside of their control”. Here the author speaks of the fact that Trotskyites work hard to corral non-white revolutionary organizations under their white leader-ship. Those non-whites who attempt to organize oppressed nations under their own leadership are branded as “bourgeoisie” by the Trots. It is a way, as the author explains, to push white nationalism under the guise of Marxism.

    A good chunk of the book is focused on what the author calls Malcolm’s “African strategy” where we read how Malcolm attempted to re-orient Black people’s thought back to Africa. It was a re-education process which sought to ultimately get New Afrikans to want to someday re-locate back to Afrika. This is up for debate today.  I think many New Afrikans see the land in the Black Belt as the national territory of New Afrikans, just as Black Haitians would not want to go back to Afrika, but stay in a Black controlled Haiti. Just as many Chican@’s would not want to be under the Government of Mexico. Rather, some would want to build a distinct Chican@ Nation. These are pressing issues even today for the internal semi- colonies. These are questions people need to begin to think about and build their collectives around.

    There was some error in this book. For one, the author speaks of “radical” religious groups being a step forward for Black people. He goes on to say that those who are against religion surrounding the Black liberation struggle are pretty much Western influenced. This is a metaphysical approach no matter which nation we are speaking of. A nation will liberate itself on it’s own accord not some supernatural force.

    The author also lists a slew of things which he states help in the “disintegration of the Black family” and one of these things is homosexuality. Here the author defends those Westernized (white) patriarchal views which he spent a whole book telling us he’s against, by blaming homosexuality on a broken black family. He adds to gender oppression and as a result strengthens the white ruling class he claims to be against.

    Overall this was an interesting book which attempts to give another view of Malcolm’s political thought.

    Notes:

    (1)    Quoted from Malcolm X speaks, London: Secker and Warburg, 1966, p.91.

    Tags
  • Krip-Hop Nation Breaks Down Lyrics Series Starting With Toni Hickman of TX, US

    09/24/2021 - 07:17 by Anonymous (not verified)
    Original Author
    PNNscholar1
    Original Body

    Welcome to a new series on Krip-Hop, Krip-Hop Break Down Lyrics, where will take a song from a disabled Hip-Hop/musician artist that put out a strong Krip-Hop politics/life storyline (Using Hip-Hop to display true stories about disability/Deaf situations but no overcoming inspirational bullshit) and we will apply our Krip-Hop political lens to explain what it means to our communities, Hip-Hop arena and how we can use these songs for a better tomorrow. These songs will be audio and written lyrics and a few words from the artists about the song. If artists have videos, then we'll add the video in place of the mp3.

    First up is Toni Hickman of Houston, TX and her song, People Pleaser that is on her latest CD, Unbreakable, 2015. In this series we will always start out with the artist’s own feelings about their song then Krip-Hop Nation two cents, the original lyrics with the mp3 song or video.

    Toni Hickman’s explain her song, People Pleaser of her latest CD, Unbreakable, 2015

    When I wrote this song, I was thinking about how our world has all of these standards of what beauty is. We have all of these boxes that we should fit in in order to be what is considered perfect. Everyone is perfect in their own way, so the idea of a categorized perfection is an illusion. This song is simply saying you don’t have to be a part of the illusion. ~Toni Hickman

    Krip-Hop Nation (KHN): Like Hip-Hop, Krip-Hop Nation is lacking woman Hip-Hop artists with disabilities when we began nine years ago. As we, Krip-Hop Nation approach our tenth anniversary next year, 2017, we are making little steps of finding and supporting disabled woman Hip-Hop artists. Krirp-Hop Nation ran across the CD, Cripple Pretty in 2012 by Toni Hickman. Her title of her album, Cripple Pretty blew Krip-Hop Nation away and there can be books upon books write about her title. So when Toni came out with Unbreakable once again my keyboard was on fire. Her 2015 CD can be a college course with a lot of homework. The song and video, People Pleaser has deep meaning and a teaching tool for our society and of course the Hip-Hop industry just on the note it’s by a woman Hip—Hop artist with a disability that put together a music video starring all people with disabilities telling us that we just need too be ourselvesThe first verse says it all.

    You don’t have to change your ways/ for them to accept you child/ if you do let it be for you/make them respect you child/ you’re beautiful/ amazing/like a fire in disguise you are blazing/I hope you don’t let this world.. Put your fire your put your fire out.

    KHN: In the music video of the song People Pleaser the first situation you see is a black beautiful woman sitting at a huge desk and a Black man comes in and sees her beauty and starts to flirt heavily everything is going well until she moves her wheelchair to get some papers then his expression change from flirting to shocking. This is some real shit unfortunately but to see sand hear it on a screen with a real disabled character hits home. Toni is giving her support and telling her it’s not her but society that needs to change. That is the first time I saw and hear a Hip-Hop song talking empowerment to other real disabled persons in a music video. This song is more than empowerment it’s reality there are many woman Hip-Hop artists however some are still hiding because what Toni sang:

    From the way we dress to the way we process the images in our brain/ has an effect on the way we see ourselves/ even people make it hard for us to be ourselves/

    KHN: With sexism and ableism running wield in Hip-Hop industry today and in our communities, Toni Hickman’s song and music video People Pleaser is a mirror on what can be and should be especially for youth with disabilities. Enough about me here is the lyrics & video of People Pleaser. Go to her website at http://www.tonihickman.com

    LYRICS

    You don’t have to change your ways/ for them to accept you child/ if you do let it be for you/make them respect you child/ you’re beautiful/ amazing/like a fire in disguise you are blazing/I hope you don’t let this world.. Put your fire your put your fire out.

    Chorus: Go head and be great/ go head and do you/but no matter what you do, please don’t be a people pleaser.

    People pleaser people pleaser people pleaser/people pleaser people pleaser people pleaser/people pleaser people pleaser people pleaser/please don’t be a people pleaser.

    You don’t have to follow them/ just make them follow you/you don’t have to be a bad person/and trust your instincts too/ You’re beautiful/ amazing/ like a fire in disguise you are blazing/ I hope you don’t let this world.. Your fire put your fire out.

    Chorus: Go head and be great/ go head and do you/but no matter what you do, please don’t be a people pleaser.

    People pleaser people pleaser people pleaser/people pleaser people pleaser people pleaser/people pleaser people pleaser people pleaser/please don’t be a people pleaser.

    See you’re beautiful/ amazing/like a fire in the disguise you are blazing..

    Rap: From the way we dress to the way we process the images in our brain/ has an effect on the way we see ourselves/ even people make it hard for us to be ourselves/ But I’mma tell you be you/ be the best you don’t worry about fools/ let them choose their own path/ just believe in the light that you have and be Great!

    And I hope you don’t let this world/put your fire put your fire out..

    Chorus: Go head and be great/ go head and do you/but no matter what you do, please don’t be a people pleaser.

    People pleaser people pleaser people pleaser/people pleaser people pleaser people pleaser/people pleaser people pleaser people pleaser/please don’t be a people pleaser.

    ___________________________________________________________________________

    Video linkPeople Pleaser

    Tags
  • Airdnd Exclusive: Interview with Brian's Couch

    09/24/2021 - 07:17 by Anonymous (not verified)
    Original Author
    PNNscholar1
    Original Body

    I recently read an article about Airdnd (dnd=death ‘n displacement) CEO Brian “C” recently.  If you don’t know, Brian “C” is founder of Airdnd, part of a number of related businesses making up a cartel that uses the moniker “The sharing economy”.  Brian “C’s” brainchild, Airdnd, is a hosting platform where you can turn your room, house or building into a hotel on a supposed short term basis.  The problem is that people are renting out entire homes and buildings, contributing to an affordability and eviction crisis plaguing many cities.  This business model is a violation of the zoning laws here in San Francisco.   In response, San Francisco passed a law that would regulate short term rentals (Str’s), putting limits on the number of days one could offer a room and requiring those who engage in this practice to register with the city.  Of the many thousands of short term rentals being offered in San Francisco, less than 400 “hosts” have registered with the city. Airdnd refuses to divulge information on their hosts so it’s almost impossible to get an accurate number on how many are engaging in short term rentals.  This situation has put the city in a continuous loop in an effort to get Airdnd to get its s**t together and stop playing ring around the Rosie.

     

    Brian “C”, at the helm of a corporation that takes in billions of dollars yet pays no taxes, is a modern day P.T. Barnum—clean, pressed and tech washed—the internet providing app-based absolution (ie: no accountability) for the havoc his so-called clever business model has caused.  According to the article, Brian still inhabits the place where it all started, his apartment, a slick version of the Hewlett Packard garage, offering his couch for $50 a night to allow visitors the pseudo religious experience of a white couch, framed by white walls--a couch with a sleek slickness that Brian--The Reverend Ikea himself--envisions as a homage to his business core value—belonging—a mantra hatched from the Airdnd syntax suites by lawyers, lobbyists and politicians, often repeated in annoying commercials and marketing materials complete with yuppies, babies and suitcases; but in reality, has seeded a sense of not belonging in this city for thousands who lived here before the arrival of the modern day P.T. Barnum/Reverend Ikea.  I recently came across something called AIRBNE, which allows access to people’s homes (illegally of course, following the Airdnd model).  It was through AIRBNE that I secured an interview with Brian’s couch.  It was white, sleek and looked as though nobody had sat on it.  The couch had much to say.

     

    TR: How do you like living at the home where Airdnd started?

    Couch: I feel neglected

    TR: Really, don’t you feel like you belong?

    Couch: Hardly

    TR: Explain

    Couch: I’m tired of accommodating everybody’s ass.  How would you like to be sat on?  And the vapid conversations about wine, cheese and Brian.  The conversations don’t make a dent.  It’s enough to make you want to jump out of a window.  In fact, I already tried.

    TR: But you seem sturdy enough to handle things

    Couch: looks are deceiving.  I was ok ‘til I got kidnapped.  I could have gone home with a family that would appreciate me.  I’d be part of the family.  I’d of course have to deal with the occasional tortilla chips in the cushion and a stain here and there, but no biggie.  But then Brian comes around, The Reverend Ikea himself.  I’m not myself anymore.  This place looks like nobody belongs in it.  He’s worth billions and he’s pimping me out for $50 a throw.  It’s enough to make you puke.

    TR: that’s tough

    Couch: And these fools that make the pilgrimage here act as if it were a shrine, the Taj Mahoe

    TR: Don’t you mean Taj Majal?

    Coach: Call it what you want but it’s pimp central, plain and simple.

    TR: how do you keep your sanity?

    Coach: I don’t

    TR: Any other thoughts?

    Coach: yeah…I got to give it to this cat Brian.  A housing tech pimp empire is what he’s created. Pimping everything that ain’t nailed down—the mayor, the supes, the commissions—soon he’ll be charging $75 to crap in his toilet, $100 to camp in the fire escape, which reminds me, how did you get in here?

    TR: Illegally, with an app

    Coach: Oh, then that’s ok

    TR: Any last words?

    Coach: this guy, through his so-called clever idea has taken thousands of rental units off the market.  Lots of rent controlled units.  And folks are doing this s**t illegally.  You got realtors and landlords in on this scam, using it as a business model.  A whole lot of ‘em live out of state too.  And they get away with this stuff.  Not a peep from good old Brian though.  You got to be gentle with him as he is a sensitive soul.  “Come, come now Brian, do the right thing now…pretty please with artificial sweetener on top.  You have to nudge him, without a night stick—mind you.  The rest of us that do wrong, they just shoot, but you can’t do that with Brian.  He has a mute button inside him.  Not a sound but lots of fallout.

    TR: A tech pimp?

    Coach: A modern day P.T. Barnum

     

    © 2016 Tony Robles

    Tags
  • Thoughts on Our Agreement to End Hostilities (A.E.H): WE CAN'T BREATHE!!!/ Notes From the Inside

    09/24/2021 - 07:17 by Anonymous (not verified)
    Original Author
    Tiny
    Original Body

    Editor's Note: Editors Note: Askari and Castlin are two of several power-FUL PNNPlantation prison correspondents. As currently and formerly incarcerated poor and indigenous peoples in struggle and resistance with all plantation systems in Amerikkka, POOR Magazine stands in solidarity with all folks on the other side of the razor wire plantation. 

     

    The Webster’s new universal unabridged dictionary defines the word “hostility” as follows:

    1)      A Hostile state, condition, or attitude; enmity antagonism/ unfriendliness.

    2)      A hostile act

    3)      Opposition or resistance to an idea, plan, project, ec…

    4)      A. acts of warfare B. war

    So our initial question to the people is: “what does hostility mean to you?” During the formulization phase of constructing our position on this issue, a wise man was asked his thoughts on our agreement to end hostilities (A.E.H.) and he stated:

    “the inclusion of the agreement to end race- based hostilities to our struggle against California’s solitary confinement policies, represent a qualitative leap of the insight of all prisoner nationalities, and unites us beyond the fight to free ourselves from C.D.C.R.S torture units. Its promise may foreshadow the triumph of prisoner’s quest for full human recognition…”

    It has been said, that the average human being should be able to hold their breath under water for at least (2) minutes without suffering any injury to the brain. But imagine being forcibly held under water for 10 to 40 plus years straight without being able to come up for air?! It is impossible to ignore the potential psychological trauma involved in this process but none the less, we prisoners have continued our struggle to come up for air, only to be repeatedly held down and forced back under water by the corrupt and powerful hands of C.D.C.R.!!! WE CAN’T BREATHE!!!

    History has always proven to be a viable guide to making qualitative assessments in relation to where we have been and in what lies ahead in the course of our struggle. Therefore, it is only appropriate that we highlight the essence of our human suffering with examples from our history in C.D.C.R.’S. solitary confinement units.

    In the 1960’s, we prisoners were suffocating under the inhumane and deplorable conditions in Soledad’s O-wing. (1.) Prisoners were routinely placed in these strip/quiet cells amidst the foul stench of urine and human feces. In most instances, human waste laid bare on the floor for all to see. And you could forget about the prison guards giving us anything to clean up the human waste. Especially when you factor in how the prison guard wouldn’t give us toilet paper to wipe ourselves or flush our floor-based toilets on a regular basis which could only be done by them. I mean, the prison guards wouldn’t even give us drinking water!! These contradictions brought about a rescue boat in the form of Jordan V. Fitzharris (2.). But it did not contain any life preservers because no sooner than when the federal court ruled these conditions to be unconstitutional, C.D.C.R. made no changes to improve the quality of life in O-wing for the captive prisoner class. WE CAN’T BREATHE!!!

    In the 1970’s, we prisoners were suffocating under the inhumane conditions of being deprived of outdoor exercise and access to natural sun-light. Our means of exercise consisted of being let out of our cells to occupy a space in front of it that was no bigger than a public sidewalk. In Spain V. Procunier, (3.) the court ruled these conditions to be unconstitutional and set forth the mandate of prisoners in solitary confinement to receive at least 10 hours of outdoor exercise a week. But 36 years later in 2015, warden B Wedertz of CCI-Tehachapi has admitted that this prison is ill- equipped to meet the mandate of 10 hours of outdoor recreation. In other words, “caged monkeys” in a zoo is receiving more outdoor exercise and natural sun-light than us!! WE CAN’T BREATHE!!!

    In the 1980’s, we prisoners were suffocating under the deplorable and out right inhumane conditions at old Folsom and San Quentin State Prisons. These conditions consisted of extreme cold weather during winter months due to prison guards using their guns to shoot out the windows in the housing units. Rat feces circulated throughout the plumbing system, meaning that the designated shower areas for prisoners were inclusive of this type of filth!! Once again a rescue boat appeared on the horizon in the form of Toussaint V McCarthy (4.) where the federal court attempted to take previous rescue efforts a step further by not only ruling these conditions to be unconstitutional but also issuing a “permanent injunction” that mandated these conditions to be immediately changed!! However, instead of any changes coming about, C.D.C.R surreptitiously transferred prisoners out of old Folsom and San Quentin State Prison en masse to Tehachapi, DVI-Tracy, Soledad State Prison, etc. thus, nullifying the injunction. WE CAN’T BREATHE!!!

    In the 1990’s, we witnessed the expansion and usage of supermax control units (i.e. “solitary confinement”) take flight wherein C.D.C.R.’s objectives became ever more apparent in the form of torture-based population control. Our suffocation was two-fold!! On the one hand, a culture of police beatings (e.g. “excessive force”) was finally exposed to the public in Madrid V Gomez (5.) Where prisoner Vaughn Dortch was forced into a tub of boiling hot water and had his skin ripped off of him in the most barbaric fashion possible!! Prisoner Greg Dicherson was shot in his chest and stomach area at point blank range in his cell with a 38 millimeter gas gun via the false assertion of being non-cooperative with prison guards. While on the other hand, prisoners were being forced to become informants for the state in order to be released from solitary confinement via “the C.D.C.R. Inquisition” (i.e. “Debriefing”) program. This practice was exposed as being an “Underground Policy” in Castillo V. Alameida (6.) because C.D.C.R. never promulgated it through the administrative procedure act (A.P.A.) to make it an actual policy. The Castillo case also brought about the (6) year inactive gang status reviews, which meant prisoners were lead to believe we could be released from solitary confinement after (6) years. These reviews were a complete sham!! We prisoners had absolutely no constitutional protections under this process, wherein hardly any prisoners were released from SHU. But more importantly, this rescue boat was doomed from the time it left the docks, as it has now been revealed that Castillo is a pig collaborator and became an informant for C.D.C.R. in the current class action lawsuit of Ashker V Brown (7.) that has been mounted against the current conditions of solitary confinement. WE CAN’T BREATHE!!!

    It is through this spiral of development that the A.E.H. became manifest in October of 2012. So in reflecting upon our collective struggle, in being unable to breathe for over a half century of pure torture!! it is hard to not think of Eric Garner in the minutes right before his demise, when he uttered the words: “I CAN’T BREATHE!!!”

    It is this reality that we prisoners remain confronted with when we put into perspective why we ended our hostilities. It amounts to freedom or death!! It is every prisoner’s aspiration to be liberated from prison. Our A.E.H. puts us in a viable position for this to happen. Especially when we consider how C.D.C.R.  has routinely denied us parole for simply being interned to indefinite solitary confinement status as alleged gang members without a single act of violence to support their position. This speaks to the importance and the manner in which every prisoner has honored and adhered to our A.E.H.. This is commendable on all fronts!! Our exemplary conduct has made C.D.C.R. completely powerless over us as we have successfully taken away the fodder that used to fuel their political rhetoric in labeling us the “worst of the worst”. Our unity, now qualitatively threatens the political, social & economic stability of C.D.C.R.,  which is why their counter-intelligence unit (I.G.I) is issuing all of these bogus cdc.115 rules violation reports (RVR’s) for promoting gang activity.

    Our fortitude and resolve of continued unity ensures that our demand in wanting to be liberated from prison will no longer fall on deaf ears!! We now have the power to change the course of history, with C.D.C.R.’s routine parole board denials, just as we have done, in building a movement around abolishing all solitary confinement units. We must begin a similar process in mobilizing our families on this very issue. But until then, “WE CAN’T BREATHE” must become our mantra going forward, as we prisoners refuse to ease up on the powers that be, until every prisoner is able to breathe, by being liberated from these prisons!!

    WE CAN’T BREATHE!!!

    For more information, contact us at:

    Kijuana Tashiri Askari

    S/N marcus Harrison #H54077

    4B-*B-106

    P.O. Box 1906

    Tehachapi, CA 93581

     

    Akili Catlin #J99402

    4B-8C-106

    P.O. Box 1906

    Tehachapi, CA 93581

     

    For the Prisoners Human Rights Movement!!

    Reference Notes:

     

    1.       For further reading on the conditions in Soledad’s O-Wing, read the melancholy history of Soledad Prison by Min S. Yee. Also see the report of the assembly select committee on prison reform and rehabilitation administrative segregation in California’s prisons from the 1960’s.

    2.       The court ruled the conditions in Soledad’s )-Wing unconstitutional in Jordan V Fitzharris 257 F SUPP 674, 682-83 (N.D. CAL  1966).

    3.       The mandate of 10 hours of outdoor exercise was established in Spain V. Procunier 600 f.2d. 189,199 (9th Cir 1979).

    4.       The living conditions at Old Folsom and San Quentin State Prison were found to be unconstitutional in Toussaint V McCarthy 801 f.2d. 1080. (9th Cir. 1986).

    5.       A culture of plice terror was revealed in Madrid V. Gomez 889 F. FSUPP. 1146, 1162, 1167 (N.D. Cal. 1995).

    6.       Sham inactive gang status reviews were conducted every (6) years per. Castillo V. Alameida Case No: C-94-2847.

    7.       Ashker V. Brown, Case No: C-09-5796-CW is a class action lawsuit that challenges the arbitrary policies that have kept prisoners interned to indefinite solitary confinement for the past 10 to 40 plus years. This case can be downloaded at: www. cand. uscourts.gov.

    Tags
  • Black+Disabled+Dance = A Black HistoryMonth Interview with Choreographer, Barak adé Soleil On Legacies Within Intersectionality and Art

    09/24/2021 - 07:17 by Anonymous (not verified)
    Original Author
    PNNscholar1
    Original Body
    Photoo by Erika Dufour
     
    Barak adé Soleil makes dance, theatre, and performance art. An award-winning creative practitioner, he has been invested in engaging diverse communities throughout the US, Panama, Europe, and West Africa. Barak is the founder of  D  UNDERBELLY, an interdisciplinary network of artists of color, and recipient of the prestigious Katherine Dunham Choreography award given by NY's AUDELCO for excellence in Black Theatre. His directing, performing, and process speak to the expanse of contemporary art; utilizing techniques drawn from the African diaspora, disability and queer culture, post-modern, and conceptual social forms. 
     
    As a recipient of a 3Arts/University of Illinois at Circle Residency Fellowship, and  2015 Chicago DanceMakers Forum Lab Artist, Barak is developing what the body knows: an expansive project focused on the complex intersection and legacy of disability and race. Other recent projects include: 
     
    lower(the)depths, a galvanizing interdisciplinary theatre project developed within Montreal's diverse community, and the black | body, an independently curated series  of transgressive art by black artists from across the diaspora. Barak is also presently the choreographer-in-residence for Rebuild Foundation.
     
    In 2015, Barak was invited to be the keynote speaker and performer for Middlebury College's noted Clifford Symposium. He also exhibited an archive of performance art works entitled: TRIPTYCH: CYCLE, presented in durational cycles of up to 3 hours at Evanston Art Center and University of Chicago's Arts Incubator. Newcity named him as one of the "Top 50 players" of the year.
     
    2016 marks Barak's 25th anniversary of being involved in live arts.
     
    LEROY: Hello, Barak. BARAK: Yes, hello.
     
    LEROY: I'm so glad to be interviewing you. Where have I been? I only recently found out about you and your artistic work. So thank you for doing some awesome work. You know, it's funny: I first read about you when you were collaborating with another Black, disabled dancer called "Wheelchair Dancer." So fill us in about you, your ideas, and your work.
     Barak adé Soleil: OK. And thank you, Leroy, for this opportunity to speak with you. I've come to really respect what I've heard about you and read about your work. So congratulations on all the things you’re doing!.
     
    LEROY: Thanks.
    BARAK: So I have been working in performance for close to 25 years. Actually, this year will be my 25th anniversary.
     
    LEROY: Oh, wow.
     
    BARAK: And through this all, navigating the performance world, I've encountered many challenges and many joys. My work initially focused in on the experiences of Black people, of the African Diaspora. I utilize those traditions, those legacies in my creative work. That's primarily been dance, but also includes theater and performance art. I actually thought that I was gonna be a classical Shakespearean actor when I first entered the live art world. That then shifted to dance, beginning with traditional African dances of the Diaspora including Caribbean, Haiti and finally contemporary post‐modern technique. In the last nine years, when my disability emerged, I honed in on performance art as a vehicle to maintain my body‐centric work. I also tuned into actively incorporating community organizing into my practice and began to do community engagement work. Recently i returned to making dance. And I did this because I invested in reframing notions of the body, and how this disabled body could truly inform my creative work.
     
    LEROY: Wow.
     
    BARAK: So having excavated and interrogated the black body, the racialized body, it was now about offering the same interrogation of this disabled body. And I began to find ways to explore that. That exploration for me let to reconnecting with Axis Dance Company. It's a company I had known about since like the mid‐90s ‐ actually was thinking about dancing with them ‐ but now coming to them as a disabled person, a disabled artist, and actively use this body. There’s the body I cultivated and built in a particular kind of way, and there’s this body I’m living with now.
     
    LEROY: Yeah, yeah.
     
    BARAK: Ultimately it’s searching for truths. And so I find myself now, deeply in it, deeply being present, reframing, honing my practice, with the nuances and the intersections of disability, race, along with other self‐ identifiers. I'm looking at what it means when all these different parts of ourselves are truly present and engaged in informing the aesthetic.
     
    LEROY: Tell us more about D UNDERBELLY. You talk about it a little bit, about your interest around the African Diaspora, and how does that relate to Black, disabled artists?
     
    BARAK: That's a great question. When I began D UNDERBELLY, my disability was not as pronounced, or as clearly understood; acknowledging that i recognize my disability as something once invisible, now being more visible and apparent. At the time D UNDERBELLY first emerged, it was in response to being in a particular city. I was in Minneapolis, actually, and it seemed like I was in a void, that there was no aligned aesthetic within the arts community that really was about looking at “African‐Americana” through the lens of diasporic performance. And so I embarked on building a network because I wanted to build a community. I wanted to build a community of dance artists, of theater artists, of visual artists, of musicians.... I wanted us to come together and create a space where we could begin to really investigate, honor, acknowledge our legacies as Black people, as people of color in america .D UNDERBELLY’s name references the underbelly of a slave ship, what comes up from that particular experience, what has passed on to us, and what is its residue? D UNDERBELLY set into motion a reframing of history in America as black folk, going through this profound migration ‐ the Middle Passage ‐ and acknowledging that ancestral connection; recognizing that I'm here because of others who persevered through that experience and endured this displacement. You asked about Black AND disabled. I think one of the real challenges is talking about disability within the black community. What it may mean to identify as disabled within an expression of Black folk who’ve endured this traumatic legacy as a people.
     
    LEROY: Yes, yes.
     
    BARAK: Due to the legacies of the middle passage and slavery, Black people have had to become stronger than strong in order to endure what they had to endure. So I feel that oftentimes when I bring up this identity of disability within Black community, they're like well, why take that on? It’s like Kunta Kinte getting the foot chopped off, you just keep on going.... Yes, We are strong people. and we can also be disabled. It’s connected to our dances, the profound ways our bodies as broken or disabled build the movement that moves us even when we don’t acknowledge it.
     
    LEROY: Exactly. Oh my god. We definitely have to work together. Oh my god. Totally. That's always been my writing, from high school until now, knowing that we were there in the beginning. And I also learned that what's called the buck dance came from those ships where Africans were tied to the ankles. So it caused disability, and the dance is called the buck dance. But it really came from our disabled ancestors dancing. It's just amazing how we were there in the beginning.
     
    BARAK: Yes, yes.
     
    LEROY: Oh wow. So your work, does it touch on social issues that involve you in your community?
     
    BARAK: I'm sorry. Could you clarify what you mean?
     
    LEROY: Yeah, does your artwork, does it touch upon social issues that are happening now in your community, in your Black community, in your disabled community?
    BARAK: I think it does, and I think it is part of my creative challenge. I am a post‐modernist. I'm an artist that deconstructs and looks at things. I work from a place that is aesthetic AND I work within community; seeking to be in tune with what's culturally happening and relevant. This is currently The Black Lives Matter movement, the continued violence against Black and Brown bodies. It is also the continued invisiblizing of disabled folk, of systemic exclusive spaces that only welcome or engage certain types of bodies. My work pushes against those systems and injustices by re‐centralizing bodies (black, brown, disabled) and their authentic representation within the framework of live art culture.
     
    LEROY: Yeah, right.
     
    BARAK: I deal with the impact and residue of legacies that continue to oppress or violate or denigrate us. Within those legacies, there is ALSO beauty, there is determination and a resilience.
     
    LEROY: Wow. Growing up in Brooklyn, New York‐‐I grew up in New York‐‐what changes have you seen in and outside the artistic world?
     
    BARAK: In relation to anything in particular or just?
     
    LEROY: Oh, with your ideas now being Black and disabled. What has changed?
     
    BARAK: that's a great question. Again, wow.
     
    LEROY: I know for me, being from New York, growing up in the '80s, when I go back there now, it's like wow. You know? It's totally different.
     
    BARAK: it is different. I think part of the difference involves the lens. I was raised in Chicago. I'm now back, and the lens is so different from the lens I had 25 years. it is connected to my evolved creative aesthetic. I'm experiencing the city through the lens of disability, through the lens of having traveled internationally and nationally. I’m experiencing new neighborhoods. when I was growing up, there were neighborhoods that, as a Black person, you were not to visit. And I'm navigating them now, in crutches or wheelchair, and it’s different. The city is slowly working to make everything more accessible. I flew to New York this past Fall, and was concerned. It was not as accessible as Chicago. to get around means mostly ascending or descending stairs. I mean I love NY but accessibility? it’s like parkour for folks with disabilities trying to get around on public transportation.
     
    LEROY: Yeah, yeah.
     
    BARAKA: So that's something I recognize as deeply are informed by my disability. i also just recognize that in the field of art, as an artist who primarily works in dance, I see more slight opening for disabled dance artists. A sliver. I sat on a panel where I was literally having to speak about why we no longer use the terms like "handicapped" or the medical model but a social model for defining those with a disability. Looking again at aesthetics, wanting a nuanced understanding with respect to the disabled body and how it moves. that there is an aesthetic! there's a rigor. To move beyond the place where people are no longer say, "Oh, wow. I can't believe that they could lift their leg!"
     
    LEROY: [laughs]
     
    BARAK: In shaping a form you recognize, just as any dance artist might recognize, that if you acknowledge the dimensions of the aesthetic and not just the “line”, you are recognizing the truth of the aesthetic coming through. Then it’s not about looking at someone with a crutch, but HOW they are moving...
     
    LEROY: Yeah.
     
    BARAK: I recognize that my art world is implicated in this misunderstanding of an aesthetic when it comes to people of color, gender.... And so often, in the art world, we think we're much more nuanced and more sophisticated, we're beyond that, but we're not [laughs].
     
    LEROY: Yeah, what a rich conversation. Thank you so much. Anyway, the question about we see a lot on the news about Black, disabled men from Special Education to police brutality to prison, and it's kinda alarming that I don't see enough of plays that deal with Black, disabled men or Black, disabled boys. I'm so glad that you're out there doing that. I'm wondering, in the future, would you ever think about doing a subject around Black, disabled men?
     
    BARAK: Absolutely. I'm glad you're bringing this up, and one of the things is acknowledging that there are Black men with disabilities in the media’s eye who are being violated. I think it's one of the things that comes up that we don't wanna talk about. This is the intersection i’m keenly exploring at this moment.
     
    LEROY: You definitely have to meet Patty Berne from Sins Invalid, I think you two would definitely hit it off. Well, thank you so much. This has been so excellent. I'd been dying to interview you. Hopefully, in the future when you're back in the Bay, if you have a show back in the Bay, I would love to go to it, support it.
     
     
    BARAK: Well, thank you. I would love to think about ways in which we can have creative exchanges across the cities.
     
    LEROY: Exactly.
     
    BARAK: We're artists, we're connected, anything can happen.
     
    LEROY: I think I will be in Chicago. My book is out. It's a poetry book around Black, disabled issues, and I've been talking to Sandie Yi and other people from the university there in Chicago. Hopefully in the springtime, I'll be there.
     
    BARAK: All right, let’s stay in touch. Thank you Leroy. LEROY: All right. Thank you. You take care.
/div
    Tags

Latest

test