Story Archives

DESCENDANTS OF ACUBALON

09/24/2021 - 11:34 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
root
Original Body

by Joseph Perryman

I WAS AN AFRICAN BUT THEN I WAS A NIGGER AND THEN I WAS A NEGRO THEN I BECAME AN AFRO AMERICAN OH AND THEN I WAS A BLACK MAN OR SO THEY SAY AND HERE IT IS AGAIN AFRICAN AMERICAN

LET’S SEE HERE I WAS AN AFRICAN STRONG BELLICOSE BELLIGERENT BENEFICENT BENEVOLENT AND DECORATIVE AND THEN NIGGER ONE LAZY ASS MUTHAFUCKA ALSO IGNORANT DUMBER THAN AH BOX OF ROCKS ON AH HOT SUNDAY AND NOW NEGRO...

MOST OF US RECENTLY FREED FROM CHAINS BUT STILL REMAIN ON PLANTIONS NOW CALLED GHETTOS DEFINITION A PLACE TO WHERE A GROUP OR RACE OF PEOPLE ARE SENT OFF TO DIE OK NOW CHECK THIS OUT NEXT AFRO-AMERICAN AFRO AH HAIR-STYLE MY HAIR-STYLE MY NATURAL HAIR-STYLE....

AND THEN NAMED BY AH STOLEN LAND WHICH I MIGHT NOT HAVE SUPPOSED TO BE BORN IN AND AIN’T THIS AH BITCH THEN I WAS AH BLACK MAN BLACK BLACK BLACK BLACK MAN DIRTY EVIL WITH BAD INTENT UNTRUST WORTHY THE DICTIONARY READS INDIGENOUS PEOPLE OF AFRICA AND THIS STILL GETS ME AFRICAN AMERICAN...

NO LONGER AM I BEING IDENTIFIED BY MY HAIR-STYLE BUT ALSO CAN’T SPORT IT WHETHER I BRAID IT OR HAVE IT COMBED NICELY THEY SAY IT’S NOT A CLEAN LOOK YOU LOOK LIKE THUG IT’S LOOKS STUPID OR IT LOOKS UNTRUST WORTHY AND THE WHITES OOP CAUCASIANS NOBODY IS PURE HAVEN’T CALLED US AFRICAN SINCE 1619 THE BEGINNING OUR BEGINNING AND THEN THIS WORD AMERICA AMERICAN AMERICA WHO AND WHAT THE FUCK IS AMERICA VERSPUCHI A MAN WHO TOLD STORIES OF A LAND REALLY CALLED TURTLE ISLAND NEVER BEEN TO THE PLACE JUST TOLD STORIES ABOUT IT AMERICANS A GROUP OF PEOPLE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MOST HEINOUS CRIMES IN HISTORY A PEOPLE WHO HOLDS THE WORLDS RECORD FOR THE BIGGEST HOLOCAUST IN HISTORY AND THEY WANNA POINT THE FINGER AT HITLER... THAT MUTHAFUCKA AIN’T GOT SHIT ON GEORGE WASHINGTON AND ABE LINCOLN HIS DECISION TO FREE US WAS STRATEGICAL NOT ETHICAL SO WE FREED OURSELVES BUT HAVE DIED AND ARE STILL DYING FOR NOTHIN MORE THAN FALSE FREEDOM...

SO WHO ARE WE REALLY THE RULES SAY IF YOU’RE BORN IN A LAND YOU’RE FROM THAT LAND BUT I CAN NOT BE AN AMERICAN I HAVE NOTHIN TO DO NOR WANT NOTHIN TO DO WITH ROBBING PEOPLE OF THIER LAND AND KILLING THEM OFF TO ENSLAVE ANOTHER..

50 STARS FOR 50 STATES MORE THAN 50 TRIBES ONLY 5 RECOGNIZED BY THE U.S.GOVERMENT AND NONE FOR ME AND MINES AND I CAN’T BE AH NIGGER CAUSE I BUILT THIS COUNTRY AND STILL HOLD IT UPON MY SHOULDERS TO THIS DAY AND NEGRO JUST DOESN’T DESCRIBE MY PEOPLE WE AIN’T GONNA EVEN TALK ABOUT AFRO-AMERICAN AND I FOR DAMN SURE AIN’T DIRTY EVIL UNTRUST WORTHY OR HAVE BAD INTENTIONS UPON ANYONE...

I HATE EVERYBODY EQUALLY AND LOVE EVERYONE THE SAME SO I’M NOT BLACK AND AFRICAN AMERICAN IT’S HALF RIGHT THE AFRICAN PART THAT IS BUT WE JUST CAN’T BE AFRICANS CAUSE WE WAS NOT BORN THERE OCCORDING TO THE RULES SO I SAY WE ARE AFRICAN DESCENDANTS CAUSE WE WAS BORN HERE NOT AFRICA ACUBALON IF YOU REALLY WANNA GET DOWN TO IT..

MY AFRICAN PEOPLE YOU HAVE GOT TO REALIZE THAT THERE IS ONE LAST CHAIN TO BE BROKEN AND IT’S IN OUR MINDS THE WILLIE LYNCH PROGRAM IS STILL IN AFFECT 5 DEGREES OF SEPARATION IF WE ARE FIGHTIN EACH OTHER THEN WE ARE NOT FOCUSING ON THE THREAT... REMEMBER WHAT WE STILL FIGHTING FOR OUR FREEDOM UNDERSTAND THAT WE ARE ALL WE GOT AND WE HAVE GOT TO FREE OURSELVES IN ORDER TO FREE EACH OTHER IT WILL NOT WORK ALONE
WHEN YOU SEE EACH OTHER SO LOVE NO MATTER WHAT BE GLAD THAT THEY MADE IT ON THIS LONG HARD JOURNEY AND IT AIN’T OVER....

I DEDICATE THIS TO MY BROTHER KENNY G. BORN FEB 26,1975 TO APRIL 30,2000 ALWAYS IN MY HEART ANOTHER AFRICAN WARRIOR LOST TO THIS AMERICAN BULLSHIT..ARE YOU AN AMERICAN ?

JOE PERRYMAN

1619

Tags

God Lite

09/24/2021 - 11:34 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
root
Original Body

Due to time constraints, this will be a lesson in writing a micro column.

This is the third week that I have picked up a small multi-colored pamphlet.

by Joseph Bolden

The pamphlets were in the following colors: yellow-red, purple-black
and florescent pink-black.

The first pamphlet, in yellow and red, says: "Are You Trapped In a Housing Crisis?" A smiling woman, Goldi Lox is her name, offers assistance. I read it and admired the nicely drawn pictures. But at the end I find that it’s NOT about earthly housing crisis, but about "Having a home with God".

Nice, kind sentiment Ms. Lox but working poor, homeless People who are alone, or especially those who are mothers with children need "Real Homes" to live in while we’re "STILL ALIVE ON EARTH."

The next two pamphlets ask: Why PDA’s? The drawing is simple, it looks like a hand-held palm pilot . But at the end of the pamphlet, I find out that PDA is Personal Divine Advocate. Folks, do you see a pattern?

My last pamphlet, in shocking pink, is called "The Ultimate Note Book". On its cover is a drawing of a guy wearing glasses who is opening up his laptop. Again great graphics. Of course "TUNB" is the Bible. At first I’m thinking Catholics. Wrong, it’s a Jews for Jesus pamphlet. Whatever.

I had to get these pamphlets out of my mind because they are Not helping people struggling to find housing, better education, jobs or healthcare. While they're punning homelessness and access they could also be placing much needed info on free computer classes and where to find "real" affordable housing in and out of San Francisco.

According to the pamphlets, getting what you want sounds easy: be good, pray, take this shit and when you die, Heaven will have everything you’ll ever need. I know religion is supposed to uplift people spiritually, but if you’re not eating, looking for work, moving from shelter to shelter, with or without General Assistance, Social Security Insurance, or on meager dwindling life savings…THE MESSAGES DON’T HELP…/>

Whatever you donate to Poor Magazine, others, or myself is a godsend. Thank you all.

What do you out there think of these and other religion-tinged leaflets? Do they help? Can they be improved upon? Please check our website for the address to send your comments to.[It's late and I'm weary. That's why the column is small and no donation address or private AJ box is here. Gotta go.]

Tags

OUR QUEST

09/24/2021 - 11:34 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
root
Original Body

What is a quest?

It's more than acts of medieval chivalry like
rescuing women from knaves or squires struggling to
become full fledged knights.

Ancient cultures had other names for quests, but they were one of many ways to prove your self worth.

by Joseph Bolden

Quests range from drinking the mythological dragon’s blood to gain immortality and strength, to trekking into new lands, to sailing alone across an ocean. There have always been high costs to discovering, learning, and exploring. The cost of such hard won knowledge is paid in unknown lives and blood.

We Americans sometimes do not acknowledge the debts paid by the ancient world. We’re so young, new like scions of old money and we squander many a precious gift parents and relatives gave us to use with care.As a species, not a single one of our countries is on a quest. Quests await us. There are dangers to face and natural and technical laws to overcome.

Right now a pendulum swings toward a conservative movement. Conservatives are needed to balance too radical departures from the norm, as moderate and radical factions are needed so conservative mindsets does not keep a society stagnant. These opposing forces are always slightly out of sync.

With Church and State almost bound together today the Conservatives fight change as always. It’s their job. In the past there have been so many shocks to individuals by Conservatives that there is more of blend or joining of moderate and radical minds. Translation: rough rides are ahead for Conservatives. Their long-held theories and ideas will be put to the test.Paradigms will shift or fall away and new ones will form.

We have a strange unfamiliar challenge. We still quest outward, changing and adapting ourselves to new and deadly environments away from our natural and terra formed world. How do we make our people smarter, stronger, better, more inventive, more innovative, and healthier? How many of our people can speak, write, play, or know the others’ languages, cultures, stories, musical instruments? Pick your quest from health, space, biotechnology, cybernetics, neurology, exobiology, other sciences or other exotic elements.

Radicals, Moderates, and Conservatives will always be with us, it's just there is more room for all. This is not only one world dominated by three groups, in fact offshoots are forming and they too will have their worlds and their say…
AND OUR QUEST CONTINUES.

Please donate what can to Poor Magazine C/0 Ask Joe at 255 9th St. Street,
San Francisco, CA. 94103 USA

For Joe only my snail mail:
PO Box 1230 #645
Market St.
San Francisco, CA 94102
Email: askjoe@poormagazine.org

Tags

Less Than Zero

09/24/2021 - 11:34 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
root
Original Body

Rich, white, males like Robert Downey Jr. get unequal justice in this society

by Nancy Muldoon

I was elated last week when I heard the news that Robert Downey Jr. had been arrested and finally fired. And, yes everyone, he really was fired!

He should have been given the pink slip a long time ago. But, Nooooooo, when you are
white, rich and male this somehow excuses criminal behavior.

If Robert Downey Jr. had been black and/or female he would have been thrown to the wolves a long time ago.

Or as my Irish Catholic working class grandmother would say, he wouldnt have a pot to piss in or a window to throw it out of!

Indeed!

Now dont get me wrong. I happen to like Robert Downey Jr. a great deal.
I grew up watching him in the brat packer movies and he kicked ass in, Less Than Zero and he was no less than brilliant in Chaplin.

However, there comes a point where, and assuming you dont have corn starch for brains, you grow tired of the well-worn Hollywood excuses. There is so much pressure... blah, blah, blah.

Its exhausting hearing about how the privileged few get a gazillion chances to screw up their lives while most of us only get one.

Then, to add insult to injury, every time his name was mentioned Iíd have to hear some variation of the But, hes just so talented monologue. Which by the way, YES he is talented, but, so what. So are a lot of other people.

I then wondered whether it was some strange Irish Solidarity thing between him and Alley McBeal creator David E. Kelley.

Irish Americans do have a tendency to by loyal. Primarily to themselves and whoeverís buying rounds of Guinness but thatís beside the point.

The worst thing you can do for an addict is to cater to their needs and manipulative ways. Traditionally, Irish males have long been known to be good humored, hardworking fuck-ups who use their handsome looks to get away with all kinds of unsavory behavior. Robert Downey Jr. is no exception. Our tolerance of him as it should have been from the beginning should be no less than zero. Iíll drink to that.

Tags

Driving While Poor

09/24/2021 - 11:34 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
root
Original Body

This is the second part in an ongoing series entitled DWP (Driving While POOR) from vehicularily housed staff writers at POOR Magazine

by Vlad Pogorelov

I woke up this morning to the sound of someone banging on the walls and windows of my house. My dog Marina did not like it, of course, and started barking violently at the intruder. I got dressed and walked outside, ready to face a teenage prankster, a street hoodlum or worse. To my surprise, I saw a policeman in a white motorcycle helmet writing down my license plate number. “How can I help you?” I asked him.

“You’ve got to move,” he replied angrily, and proceeded in filling out a “red tag”—a notice informing me I was parked illegally and would have to move or risk a $53 fine as well as having my motorhome towed.

“But I just moved here yesterday,” I told him.

“Too bad,” said the policeman. “The Captain wants everyone out of here. You’ve got to move,” he repeated, marking my tires with yellow chalk. Then he slapped a pink sheet of paper on my windshield, got into his police car and drove away.

I had a sour taste in my mouth as I studied the official document issued by Bayview Police Station. Despite beautiful spring weather, my mood was low. I had a new headache now, as I needed to find a new parking space for my 25 foot long motorhome.

To be clear, I am not a stranger to those “red tags,” which can be issued by the Police Department and DPT to any vehicle which, in their opinion, appears abandoned or broken down, or is not moving for an extensive amount of time. However, there is another category of vehicles being systematically targeted by police, regardless of how often they move or change parking spots on the streets of San Francisco. These are vehicles that serve as houses. Such are the motorhomes, the RV’s, the school buses, the trailers and other vechicles which have been converted to mobile residences. These types of vehicles are considered enemies by police, and every effort is being made by the City to ticket and tow vehicular houses in order to make it impossible for those who live in them to remain in San Francisco. But despite of all of the police efforts to chase the vehicularily housed away, many more such citizens continue to arrive. And it’s not surprising.

I am a vehicularily housed resident of San Francisco. I started living in a motorhome about a year ago after being evicted by the Sheriff’s Department from my house in Potrero Hill. Being unable to find any suitable living space that I could afford, I had no other choice if I wanted to remain in the City. Since then I have been parking my house, mostly in the China Basin area.

Since the 1960’s, vehicular housing has been an established tradition in China Basin and Central Basin. However, because of massive gentrification of Potrero Hill, Dog Patch and surrounding light industrial areas, the habitat of vehicularily housed residents is being destroyed. Within the last 2 months I have been “red tagged” more than 10 times, sometimes receiving an official threat of “house expropriation” immediately upon arrival to my new parking spot.

The threat of being towed by the police is not an empty one. Almost every day I see police towing away motorhomes, school buses, trailers and vans for variety of bogus charges.

Last Monday, one of my neighbors was towed from Potrero Hill. He had received a ticket for having his motorhome on the street, and the very next day police forced him and his dog out and then towed his house. I saw the poor man standing on the sidewalk and cursing the police: “Thieves! You robbed me!” It is almost certain that he will never be able to get his house back from the City Tow, a legalized racket incorporated into the corrupt bureaucratic machine of San Francisco. Isn’t it ironic that our City officials headed by Da’ Mayor worry so much about the homeless, yet they tow people’s houses away, leaving more people homeless?

The bottom line is: in this time of skyrocketed rents, thousands are being evicted and are not able to afford “traditional” housing. To live in a vehicle is, for many, the only alternative. But despite the affordable housing emergency, the City and the Police are practicing an illegal “ethnic cleansing” against vehicularily housed, exacerbating the crisis. And they are getting away with these unconstitutional activities. It is clear that our new progressive supervisors must interfere and instruct police departments to back off from their policy of harassment. The problem of homelessness in this city will only increase as vehicularily housed citizens are forced to park their tired bodies on a cement sidewalk.

Driving While POOR part I

By Tiny

I was living in my car at the time -as I had been on and off for many years. It was almost midnight. I was trying to inconspicuously park in a light industrial zone near 22nd and 3rd Streets… the late hour silence was filled with the cacophony of urban nature, the clicking of small waves hitting the Bay shore danced with the 2-2 rythem of a baritone foghorn… And then suddenly… a canon shaped beam of light tore through the black fabric of night. Three shimmering white vehicles circled first and then stopped. There was a heavy click-click of door handles..followed by the crunch of heels hitting asphalt, the deep wumph of doors slamming, faint police band radio yelps grew louder until a pair of thighs appeared at my window swathed in too-tight khaki polyester. Bits of arrest sounds came through a shoulder radio as the thighs slowly squatted to reveal a white mustachioed face - facial pores glistening in the pale moonlight." Can I see your driver's license and current registration? - and you are going to need to step out of the vehicle..NOW," the officer demanded, his voice had serrated steel edges that sliced through the air

Thirty terrifying minutes later the car which had acted as a "house" for my mother and myself off and on for the last several years was being towed because the registration was not current and we had too many tickets.

The mouth of the tow truck opened wide, consuming its late night snack of our beat up 1986 Ford Fairmont - starting its meal with the hind portion - the tired wheels refusing to spin, even in midair, just sat in place resigned to their seizure, bouncing one last goodbye to me before the car was dragged away to its own form of vehicular hell.

I stood there in the black night, illuminated by one lone street lamp, the distant ships providing accompaniment to my streaming tears. unsure of where to go - unsure of how to put one foot in front of the other, and think up another form of survival in a long list of survival strategies

Poor folks who are evicted from their homes due to gentrification, and/or become homeless because of other circumstances related to poverty are often forced to live in their vehicles, if they are lucky enough to have one. Often people are afraid of shelters and would choose living in their car over unsafe group living situations, such as many of the Bay Area shelters.

Vehicularily housed Bay Area residents are constantly harassed by the police - but in most cases the police harassment stems from continuous "nimbyism" from both businesses and residents, i.e., in neighborhoods - urban and suburban- the cops are swiftly summoned when anyone even appears to be homeless or vehicularily housed. And in most industrial or light industrial zones businesses will constantly call on local officials and cops to ticket, harass and/or change the existing parking laws to make sure that no one is allowed to stay and interfere with their " business"
The reality is that people in this situation are very conscious of their hygiene, their trash and their belongings and never interfere with people or businesses, rather they try to keep to themselves so as not to be noticed

The coalition on homelessness and POOR Magazine are working on this issue with the goal of addressing the unjust laws that criminalize homeless folks, and as well, we are drafting a vehicularily housed bill of rights -which will be presented before the board of supervisors in San Francisco.

We never got our "house" (car) back, even though I attempted to go through the very arbitrary tow "hearing" which people lose most of the time, based on how the man running the "hearing" is feeling that day. That experience led to a chain of events that sunk my mother and I deeper into the vicious cycle of poverty. And it also wasn't the last time that I would be confronted by the police for what I call "driving while Poor" (DWP).

POOR Magazine and The Coalition on Homelessness will be presenting a Vehicularily Housed Bill of Rights at an Art-Action-Rally on Wednesday, May 30 at 12:00 noon at City Hall in San Francisco- To get involved with the Action please call POOR at (415) 863-6306

To report Driving While Black or Brown harassment call 1-877-DWB-STOP toll free 24 hrs

Tags

Welfare Marriages

09/24/2021 - 11:34 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
root
Original Body

Should welfare providers push single mothers to marry?

by By LAURA MECKLER, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) _ Conservatives who successfully argued that the
nation's welfare system must aggressively push poor people into
jobs are preparing to push something more personal: marriage.

They argue that the breakdown of the two-parent family is the
root cause of welfare dependence, and that millions of Americans
will remain trapped in poverty unless the nation fosters a culture
of marriage in poor communities.

``All the data we have says that kids do best when they grow up
in two-parent families,'' said Rep. Wally Herger, R-Calif.,
chairman of the House Ways and Means welfare subcommittee, who
plans hearings on the issue. ``We'd like to see a return to the
family unit and to family values.''

Nationally, one in three babies is born to unmarried parents.
And among women with less than a high school education, 60 percent
were unmarried when they gave birth.

One of the 1996 welfare law's central purposes was to encourage
formation of two-parent families, but so far states have spent
little time, energy or money to this end. That is partly because it
raises sensitive questions about the role of government and partly
because there is little evidence about what works.

Now debate is beginning over what changes are needed to that
law, which must be renewed by next year, and conservatives are
laying the groundwork for a stronger focus on marriage. Liberals
have concerns, but are not rejecting their ideas out of hand.

Among them:

_requiring states to spend part of their welfare money on
pro-marriage activities.

_encouraging caseworkers to talk to pregnant women about
marrying the fathers of their unborn babies.

_judging state success based on reductions in out-of-wedlock
births.

_teaching about the value of marriage in high school.

_sponsoring experiments to see what programs might produce more
marriages.

The role of marriage in social policy has been a contentious,
painful debate since 1965, when a future senator, Daniel Patrick
Moynihan, prompted charges of racism with his report on the
breakdown of black family. Pointing to the rising number of black
babies born to unmarried parents, he suggested that the absence of
fathers and male role models _ along with the income they provide _
explained myriad social problems.

At the time, about one in four black babies was born to
unmarried parents. By 1999, it was 69 percent.

Still, 35 years later, there is little agreement on how to put
families together.

``Until we get more evidence, I'm not so sure we should be
spending huge sums of money here,'' said Wendell Primus, a welfare
authority at the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, who left
a top welfare job in the Clinton administration to protest the
president's decision to sign the 1996 overhaul.

``There are clearly some marriages that aren't going to work,''
Primus added. ``Government can't force two people to love each
other when their relationship has broken apart.''

Sandra Robertson, an advocate for the poor in Georgia, suggests
that poor women are perfectly capable of deciding when marriage is
right for them.

``I'm especially surprised that the party that talks about
wanting government out of our lives, of wanting government to stay
away from social engineering, seems to have a desire to do that for
poor people,'' Robertson said.

Others worry that women may wind up pressured to stay in
unhealthy _ even abusive _ relationships.

Robert Rector, a leading conservative welfare expert, argues
that government should not coerce anyone into marriage but should
suggest and encourage it. With a push, he says, some couples are
bound to succeed.

``You could say, `Here's a mentoring group. You don't have to do
this. But it's a free group to try and improve a relationship that
can lead you to a lifetime of love and commitment,''' he said. ``I
think it's absolutely tragic that we don't do anything like that
now.''

Talking about marriage would be a giant departure for welfare
caseworkers, who used to simply calculate whether an applicant was
eligible for benefits, said Susan Golonka, welfare expert at the
National Governors Association. Caseworkers have already expanded
their duties to include job counseling, and adding marriage
counseling would be another big step.

``There would be a lot of people who would be uncomfortable,''
she said.

There is little pro-marriage activity in social policy today.
Some fatherhood programs work to help fathers find jobs _ partly so
they can pay child support _ and to participate in their children's
lives. But co-parenting, not marriage, is the focus.

Primus, Robertson and other liberals are not rejecting the
marriage push wholesale, suggesting Rector may be right when he
predicts a growing consensus for a stronger focus on marriage.

``I don't think progressives should be scared of this issue,''
Primus said. ``We also believe in marriage and two-parent
families.''

And Robertson, who directs the Georgia Citizens' Coalition on
Hunger, says: ``It's clear when a child is wanted, and when a child
has two parents ... that child has a better chance.''

Tags

A Hangman's Noose/ a Noose left for a San Carlos Postal Employee

09/24/2021 - 11:34 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
root
Original Body

The Postmaster of San Carlos Fashioned a Noose for an African-American Postal Service Employee which was discovered by her on Martin Luther King Jr's Birthday

by Kaponda

Since August of 1988, Denise McCollum had dutifully navigated the 18-mile commute along the peninsula from her home in the Western Addition of San Francisco, to her place of employment in San Carlos City in San Mateo County. Her travels were sidetracked, however, on a Holiday of profound remembrance for African Americans and of great historic significance to all Americans.

McCollum was asked by her supervisor, Nancy Bailey, to work on the federal Holiday of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., at the Post Office in San Carlos, where she had functioned as a window/distribution clerk for more than a decade. During the waning hours of her shift on that January 15, 2000, McCollum carried out, in prescribed manner, her routine duty of checking for “leave slips.” She checked the box that she had designated and designed for employees of the San Carlos Post Office branch to deposit their paperwork for processing.

A pall of anxiety had overtaken the magnanimous spirit of McCollum as translucent moisture from her heated eyes revealed her reaction to the hangman’s noose that she encountered while looking into the leave box. After the single parent and grandmother had composed herself, she seized the veiled threat as evidence that a practice of ethnic intimidation, which had been vacated for more than 70 years, had been revived at her workplace on the Holiday of a distinguished civil rights leader.

Although the timing of the discovery of the nine-coil hangman’s noose by McCollum made it especially egregious, it was not an act conceived in a vacuum. The ominous signals of racial tension between colleagues and McCollum had been mounting over a period of time at the Post Office of mostly white employees in a city made up of over 22,000 whites and only 193 blacks. The memorandum posted in December, dated December 2, 1999, which stated, in part, “...material consisting of ethnic, racial, religious or sexual content are not suitable...,” was one visible signpost that the ugliest characteristics of humanity had been unleashed at the Post Office where McCollum was employed.

“I feel the Postmaster, Ezio Nurisio, my supervisor, Nancy Bailey, my co-workers, Eve Harmon and AnnMarie Bernal all played major roles that eventually led to my discovery of this symbol of hatred on that day at my job,” stated the gentlewoman as we discussed the chain of events that led to her current state of mind and the fears that have gripped the very soul of McCollum. “Ezio Nurisio, the postmaster, and Nancy Bailey have known each other since elementary school, and AnnMarie Bernal boasted to me about the dinner she and the postmaster shared at his house,” continued McCollum, as she had begun to recount a number of reason why she had clearly been made an outcast from the community at the Post Office.

I asked McCollum what reason she had to believe that a federal postmaster of the United States Post Office would be associated with an out-and-out atrocity like manufacturing a symbol used traditionally by hate groups as a means of ethnic intimidation?

“I think that this is the case because on January 18, 2000, I called the postmaster at his home to personally make him aware of my state of mind and what had happened. Later during the evening, I took the hangman’s noose to the San Carlos Police Department and made a formal complaint. I learned upon the completion of the investigation by the San Carlos police that it was the postmaster himself who created the noose,” stated McCollum.

I then asked McCollum, who was raised a Baptist in Kanas City, Kansas, who did the investigation by the San Carlos Police Department lay the blame on?

“According to the investigation” stated McCollum, “The official results of the investigation was that ‘the noose was meant as a joke between the postmaster, Ezio Nurisio, and Nancy Bailey,’” concluded McCollum.

The Post Office environment in which McCollum had worked had become festered with unvarnished hostilities, and the subsequent stress placed upon McCollum became unbearable, according to the peaceable McCollum, who described herself as a friendly person who used all her energy to maintain a “harmonious relationship” with each one of her co-workers. McCollum stated to the postmaster during their conversation that she had begun to fear for her life and asked for leave of duty. McCollum has not been back to work at the Post Office in San Carlos City for over one year.

Two days after McCollum talked with her postmaster and had learned that her postmaster fashioned the noose, Nuriso, the postmaster, wrote her a letter dated January 20, 2000, addressing her concerns of fear, although he did not admit in that letter that he was responsible for the outbreak of turmoil that had shattered relations at San Carlos Post Office. Also, on January 20, 2000, the same day of the letter by the postmaster, McCollum’s supervisor, Nancy Bailey, apologized to her for any misunderstanding that McCollum may have reached.

According to that same letter by Ezio Nurisio, dated January 20, 2000, addressed to Denise McCollum, Nurisio states that “...I conducted an investigation concerning your allegations that a hangman’s noose was purposely left on Supervisor Nancy Bailey’s desk as a direct attack to your person or ethnicity. The results of my investigation concluded that no such attack was intended or implied and that your safety at this office was never jeopardized or challenged....”

I attempted to contact the former postmaster and supervisor of Denise McCollum and to inquire how an objective and fair investigation could have been conducted by the very same person by whom the noose had been fashioned?

As I leaned next to the last of five windows for over 10 minutes waiting for Nancy Bailey to come out, I watched the three postal clerks as they provided service to customers with huge packages.

“Ezio Nurisio has been detailed to South San Francisco. He no longer works at this station any longer,” a woman in a black dress stated with a firm tone. As I asked Bailey which post office in South San Francisco he had been detailed, she stated that “The Postmaster is always at the main Post Office,” in a tone that seemed very hard on the ears. “Furthermore,” Bailey continued, “If you want any further information about the incident that occurred on January 15, 2000, you will have to talk with the Public Relations representative of the United States Post Office,” concluded Bailey.

The kind of hatred that existed at the workplace of McCollum is draped in centuries of bigotry and prejudice. It is not unique to any continent, country, race or ethnicity. I asked Reverend Shad Riddick of the Metropolitan Baptist Church, in whom Denise McCollum had confided when she had first experienced her ordeal, about his thoughts concerning the case of McCollum?

“I have noticed changes. One of the things I’ve noticed is that she has been sleeping more and more. Usually, when I call, if she was not in, then she would return my call right away. However, after the incident, she no longer returns my calls and daughter informs me that she always sleep. I am not a psychologist, but my opinion is that she is very, very depressed and afraid of something,” stated Rev. Riddick.

I asked Horace Hinshaw, the spokesperson for the Postal Service, if Ezio Nurisio had known that the hangman’s noose was a symbol used traditionally by hate groups, and did Ezio Nurisio believe that the fears expressed by Denise McCollum, after she discovered the noose, were real? Hinshaw responded that an administrative appeal by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is pending, and he, therefore, was not at liberty to discuss the matter of Denise McCollum.

Existing federal law protects people like Denise McCollum from workplace harassment and violent acts based on race, color, national origin or religion. Federal Civil Rights statute 18 U.S.C.A. section 245 has been instituted in the United States Congress to safeguard people like McCollum from vicious attacks by inconsiderate persons. The Department of Justice considers noose incidents to be federal crimes of intimidation, punishable by up to 10 years in prison.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation annually reports and collects statistics it gathers annually on the number of bias-related criminal incidents from law enforcement agencies. In 1996, based on reports from law enforcement agencies covering 84% of the nation’s population, the FBI reported 8,759 incidents based on the Hate Crime Statistics Act.

Tags

is panhandling work?

09/24/2021 - 11:34 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
root
Original Body

by Dee Gray and Richard Ransom

This interview first appeared in POOR Magazine, Volume 3. Titled "WORK," the purpose of this issue is to challenge our society’s narrow definitions of so-called "legitimate" labor. POOR maintains that "work" must be defined by the workers themselves, and is dedicated to presenting the voices of workers who too often labor unrecognized and unheard.

We’re examining the notion of panhandling or sparechanging as work, because at POOR magazine we consider it a form of Micro-Business, or work. The following is a transcript from the ongoing writer-facilitation dialogue between Dee Gray, co-editor of POOR and Richard X at his work site, located near Stockton and O’Farrell Streets in downtown San Francisco.

Dee: Let’s just start with…how many days per week do you work?

RX: Seven.

Dee: And what would you say are your hours of business each day?

RX: Well, I normally start anywhere from six to eight in the morning and go all the way through to nine or ten o’clock at night, with a couple of breaks in between that last maybe an hour each.

Dee: And those would be like a dinner break?

RX: Yeah.

Dee: Do you have to take any buses to work?

RX: No.

Dee: What happens at your work when it rains, or in very cold weather?

RX: It’s just another day…I’m still out here…rain or shine.

Dee: Do you live inside or outside? Do you live in a hotel sometimes or…?

RX: Basically inside…a shelter type situation.

Dee: Do you have to navigate between the shelter systems or are you stabilized for now?

RX: Stabilized as you can be within the shelter environment.

Dee: What hours do you approximately sleep?

RX: It depends, I usually get to sleep about twelve-thirty or one. I’m up at 5:30 am to start work again.

Dee: How does this job affect your health?

RX: It effects my health very seriously in that I have what’s called venous stasis ulcers, which are skin ulcers caused by poor circulation in the lower extremities, the legs. Ulcers are sores, if you didn’t know. And the fact that I’m on my feet for so many hours a day aggravates them.

Dee: Are the ulcers impacted or made worse by the work?

RX: Yeah, yeah.

Dee: I understand you also have emphysema?

RX: Yes.

Dee: And of course, the cold exacerbates that.

RX: Yes.

Dee: Okay, so when you health gets really bad, where do you go for health care?

RX: General Hospital, basically.

Dee: How long do you usually wait?

RX: Anywhere from 2 to 4 hours.

Dee: Are you well treated, would you say?

RX: Where, at the hospital?

Dee: Yeah.

RX: That’s relative to who’s treating me.

Dee: I heard that (laughter)…I know what you mean. And how about dental care?

RX: At the hospital, if I can.

Dee: What happens if you do get really sick? Do you ever take the day off?

RX: It depends on how really sick I am.

Dee: Have there been times that you’ve…been out here with active emphysema and feeling really bad?

RX: Well, there have been times I’ve been out here and not wanted to be out here, but my needs necessitate that I be out here. In other words, my health takes a back seat.

Dee: Let’s talk about harassment on the job. Can you tell us a little about that?

RX: Okay. There is a group or should I say, a team of people called the Ambassadors, whose job was primarily designed to help tourists out, by way of giving direction, just helpful hints about where to go, where not to go, who to talk to, who not to talk to.

But in fact, to my understanding, they are contracted by different stores, different companies, to keep undesirables- I guess I would be listed as an undesirable- panhandlers and drunks and so forth, off of their property, which brings about some interesting situations. For some reason, I have become the number one priority with this group of Ambassadors. And I can say honestly that I have brought some of this on in that this one particular company, the Ellis-O’Farrell garage, which is one of their contractees, I have been on their building site any number of times, because the flow of traffic into the garage is where I get my money. People are more apt to give money if they don’t have to change the direction that they’re walking.

Dee: So, that’s your work site?

RX: One of my work sites, one of my best work sites…I have a good rapport with the police officers in the area. They can attest to the fact that I have never been aggressive, never been accused of being aggressive.

Dee: I would agree.

RX: Okay, I came to the conclusion that because these people were hell bent on, to my way of thinking, destroying my livelihood, I said I’m going to get off their property, get on the curb side, city property, and continue my work.

Dee: Right.

RX: As you can see behind you, there’s a No Trespassing sign. That was put up primarily for me. So that they would have me or have the tools to hopefully get me arrested and out of the way. This is the way I look at it, and I believe that’s the way it is.

Dee: Have they called the police?

RX: Oh, yeah.

Dee: Many times?

RX: The police have been called 3 or 4 times. A couple of times were valid, a couple of times they outright lied and said I was standing on their property when I wasn’t, which brings me to another point. Because I am legal on the curbside, they have taken it upon themselves to lie to the police and say that I am on their property when I’m not. If some of the Ambassadors would tell the truth, they would attest to that fact, because the watch me. I’ve overheard them asking on their walkie-talkies, "Where is Mr. X?"

Dee: Here comes one right now…(a red jacketed Ambassador passes us, talking into his walkie-talkie about us and Mr. X)

RX: When the police have come, because my rapport is somewhat good with them, basically what they told me was, Mr. X, for the day or a couple if days, just kind of move on. Which I didn’t want to do and in one instance I challenged them, because I am legal on the curb. You know.

Dee: Right, panhandling is not illegal in San Francisco…

RX: As long as you’re not being aggressive and chasing people down the street and jumping on their back and all that.

Dee: Which you are definitely not.

RX: They want to get a court order to have me kept away 100 feet from any of their buildings…you know, kind of like a stay away order. I was told by one of the Ambassadors that I had to be 100 feet form the building. Now, this came from the Ambassadors, who in no way represent the law. I have not been told by any law enforcement officers. I have not received anything in print attesting to this fact, so as you can see, I’m not 100 feet from the building, nor do I plan to be, until I’m either told by a police officer, or in writing from a judge…you know.

Dee: Of course that kind of stay away order would be illegal as you are standing on city property, not on their property. Here comes another Ambassador talking into her walkie-talkie.

RX: Oh, yeah, she’s letting them know that I’m talking to somebody with a microphone. It all started when Karin Flood, the director of the Ambassadors, instructed her workers to take pictures of all the panhandlers and to label them as to what they either know or think that they do with their money. That is to say, if a person is a drunk, under his picture he’s labeled Joe Blow, Drunk or Joe Blow, Drug User. The lady had the unmitigated gall to come up to me one day and ask me what I did with my money. I in turn asked her what she did with her money. She didn’t take too kindly to this, obviously. But this is the extent that these people go to. Now, granted they do work with the police, because they’ve been told by the police to inform them of any crimes they see or so forth, but in my case I think- and this doesn’t involve the police, this is just with the Ambassadors themselves- they have somehow tagged me as the guy to watch at all times. And I cannot figure out why this is, because I’m really not doing anything wrong other than violating the building code by being up against the building, but I don’t do that anymore.

Dee: So now it’s becoming harassment…

RX: Well, I have to say in all fairness, in the last couple of days, it seems to have subsided somewhat.

Dee: Okay.

RX: But I do not think it’s over.

Dee: I want to ask you…do you think panhandling is a job, self-employment?

RX: I most definitely do. It’s probably one of the hardest jobs you can do.

Dee: What are your job duties? In other words, either you have to ask people to give you money or they just give it to you…or?

RX: There are different approaches…each panhandler has his own method, but there are a couple of things that have to be, that have to run true if you’re going to be successful and not violate any laws. Number one, you have to be courteous. Number two, you have to be polite. Your appearance can add or not add to what you get. I’m not too sure about that, but I know one thing, you have to be courteous, because nobody’s obliged to give you a dime. And myself, I try to have a kind word for everybody that passes. I speak…because I’m under the impression that I might not get a dime today, but if I’m courteous to this person, somewhere down the line I’m going to get something.

Dee: It’s a sales technique…but what’s going on with panhandling? Would you say it’s guilt? What are the dynamics?

RX: I think it’s any number of things. I think with some people it’s guilt. I think with others it’s a genuine concern. I think with some people it’s a "here, look at me" thing: I’m giving to this down and out person.

Dee: So, we’re thinking in long range terms, in terms of getting street vendors and panhandlers actual benefits, like health benefits, stuff like that- do you think you should get benefits, for all your hard work, like the regular City worker’s comp benefits, the whole thing?

RX: Sure.

Dee: And of course, retirement benefits, because, you know, the strength that you have to do this job I can’t imagine you having forever. Now then, can you open a checking account or do you have one already?

RX: No, I don’t.

Dee: Did you have trouble getting one, or don’t you care for one?

RX: I wouldn’t because it might raise some questions that I’d have to answer that I wouldn’t necessarily want to answer, namely form that agency that we all know and love that comes around every April.

Dee: With your permission, let’s cover a little bit of your history. Did you go to college? What kinds of jobs have you held in the past?

RX: Before my health got bad, I was a presser and tailor, dry cleaner, presser, tailor. I worked with clothes, in other words…I was employed by Brooks Brothers for about eight years. I’ve worked at any number of cleaners around the Bay Area. I have a year of college.

Dee: Were you a Union member?

RX: Yeah.

Dee: …and then your health got bad?

RX: Yeah, my health got bad, I got laid off, my wife came down with cancer. I kind of went off the deep end, which kind of led me to where I am now.

Dee: So, it’s an emotional and a physical kind of breakdown?

RX: Right, right.

Dee: So maybe self-employment or being an entrepreneur, if we look at it this way, is a way that you, Richard, can access employment. It’s your own hours, your own thing, but you work really hard; I can attest to that fact.

Two days after this dialogue, Richard was arrested in Union Square and told by a San Francisco police officer that, based on a letter received form the Ambassadors, "he should not come within 100 yards of Union Square" (a downtown SF shopping district). This police officer had no stay away order or Temporary Restraining Order. But a very intimidated Mr. X has now moved his work site to a low visibility area of Market Street where he hardly makes enough money for his lunch every day. POOR Magazine’s advocacy project is desperately attempting to attain pro-bono legal representation for Mr. X.

Richard X is a co-author of this on-going dialogue through POOR Magazine’s writer-facilitation project, a program designed to bring the POOR Magazine pre-publishing workshops, which include economic and legal advocacy, to outdoor locations for writers and artists who are unable to participate in structured or conventional indoor workshops, in an attempt to bring the "voices" and expertise of severely underserved populations into the media, while also providing much needed services.

Due to Business Improvement Districts’ (B.I.D.’s) corporate interests, urban gentrification and encroachment, several cities and states are currently attempting, or have already succeeded in, ejecting panhandlers and street newspaper vendors, even though this is an abuse of their First Amendment rights, and a further example of unfair harassment of the poor and powerless members of our society. In New York, Guiliani started with panhandlers and street newspaper vendors, forcing them out of terminals and subways, and has now moved on to all other outdoor business people, such as artists and vendors. In the Castro area of San Francisco, neighborhood businesses have launched a campaign, "Don’t give change, create change," advising people not to give change to panhandlers. In Atlanta and other parts of the U.S. they have made panhandling illegal altogether, furthering the criminalization and incarceration of the poor.

WHAT YOU CAN DO:

To resist these abuses you must join forces with other organizations dealing with these issues; In San Francisco, please call Coalition on Homelessness at (415) 346-9693. In New York, call Street News at (718) 268-5165.

Fight Business Improvement District campaigns when they are launched, like the upcoming BID in San Francisco by the City Center Partnership, i.e., the corporation consortium that created the private security firm discussed in this article, the "Ambassadors."

Our advice for a citizen encountering a panhandler is, rather than be intimidated by the panhandler, you can choose to support him or her, just like anyone attempting to sell you a product. As well, you don’t need to be concerned with what he or she does with his or her "income," i.e., the support you give or whether their story is "real," anymore than you would be concerned what any other "worker" does with his or her income

Tags

HAVE YOU EVER BEEN CONVICTED OF A DRUG OFFENSE?

09/24/2021 - 11:34 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
root
Original Body

Federal Student Aid policies deny student loans to students who have been convicted of a drug offense.

by Alison VanDeursen

I always thought it was a strange question. Tucked between queries about my interest in "work-study" and of my tax return and income (or lack thereof), Question 35 asks bluntly, "Have you ever been convicted of any drug offense?" I haven't, and though I've found it puzzling, I'm usually in a rush to meet some deadline. So I just check "No" and move on through the Federal Student Aid forms without considering the racist and classist implications of this question.

I went "back to school" four years ago, a change in my life made possible by Federal Student Aid. The grants and low-interest loans have funded my San Francisco State University tuition, as well as my books and some living expenses. I've been able to get by financially working only part-time, allowing me to concentrate on my education full-time each semester. I will be graduating this month- if I get about 15 papers done this week- with skills and experience that I will be valuable to my self and to my community. Sure, I've smoked marijuana from time to time, though I've never been arrested for it. And so what if I had?

If I had, I've recently learned, I would have been denied my financial aid, and would have been forced to drop out of school. I first read about this in the New York Times this month. Dina Jean Schemo reported that Russell Selker, a student of Ohio State University, was denied financial aid because he had been found guilty of smoking marijuana. He paid his fine, had his driver's license revoked, and was assigned probation and community service. Thinking his debt was paid, Selker was surprised when he received another sort of sentence- a block on his financial aid for college for a year. This punishment was handed down not by a judge, but by a 1998 amendment to the Higher Education Act.

Every six years Congress revises the Higher Education Act of 1965, which was enacted to provided access to education by way of Perkins Loans, Pell-Grants, and other federal student aid. The 1998 revision, signed by President Clinton, contains many provisions lauded by Congress members for making college more accessible to everyone. Yet the HEA drug provision, spearheaded by Mark Souder, R-Ind, punishes those already at-risk of marginalization: low-income people and minorities. These are people who most depend on financial aid to make education possible. These are also the people most often targeted and profiled in the "War on Drugs."

My friend Nicholas, while in college, was cited by a cop for possessing marijuana. Lucky for him, this cop let him go without an arrest. The fact that Nicholas is white and attended an Ivy League university in the northeast probably helped sway the officer- the United States Department of Justice reports that African Americans represent 55 percent of drug convictions, though they make up only 13 percent of drug users! Even if Nicholas had been arrested, he would have received a sort of special treatment. His family did not rely on financial aid to send him to college, and so, unlike a low-income student, he would not have lost his right to an education.

When the question first appeared on Financial Aid Applications, many chose not to answer, and received aid anyway. But Rep. Souder made sure in 1999 that all loopholes were closed, and the question now is followed by a stern warning, "Do not leave this question blank." If left blank, the applicant will not receive aid. If the applicant has had a drug conviction, he or she will lose aid for a period of one year to indefinitely.

The only way around the penalty is to participate in a federally-approved drug rehabilitation program that includes at least two random urine tests. This is again discriminatory- such drug programs can be difficult to access or prohibitively expensive. As well, people convicted of drug offenses are not necessarily addicts in need of rehabilitation. They may, like myself, be occasional or recreational users. I certainly don't see how the Department of Education is qualified to determine whom is in need of drug treatment programs, especially as it is only the poor and working class whom they scrutinize.

I'm sure this law was an easy sell- "We're not going to give hand-outs to druggies!" But students who must answer "Yes" to Question 35 are ineligible for ALL federal funding- this includes "work-study," where a student works on campus to earn money for school, and loans, which must be paid back with interest.

I feel fortunate that I have not been personally penalized by this law and so forced to take a leave from school. As a student who took ten years off from college, I can tell you that momentum is important. The Department of Education reports that over 8,600 students have lost federal aid this school year die to this amendment. It goes without saying that these students are middle and lower income, or else they would not be eligible for assistance in the first place! Wealthy people ARE NOT affected by this legislation, no matter how many drug convictions they may have! And only drug offenses constitute denial of federal aid- no questions are asked about rape, murder, or arson.

Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass, is at least as outraged by this law as I am! He is reintroducing legislation this year to repeal the HEA drug provision- legislation that failed to pass last year, but with increased awareness, there is hope Question 35 will disappear from the Financial Aid applications before others lose their right to an education. Check out website www.raiseyourvoice.com to send letters to congress and find out more about this issue.

Tags

Sacramento PO' Poets

09/24/2021 - 11:34 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
root
Original Body

Poets and writers from S.H.O.C. (Sacramento Homeless Organizing Coalition)

by Sacramento POOR Poets

To The Policeman

Who Went To Church On Sunday.

I was hungry

and you took away my ID

I couldn’t go to a food locker

I was cold

and you took away my warm clothes and

blankets

I was weary

and you wouldn’t let me rest

I was broken hearted

and instead of giving me comfort you

Showed your contempt

I was lonely

and you wouldn’t give me a kind word

I was frightened

and you terrorized and threatened me

I had had love and compassion

And you showed me hate

I showed you respect

And you treated me as WORTHLESS

I was homeless and you didn’t care

Is this really the way you

want to live your life?

Sunshine/AKA Billeen Pruett

P.S. Not all officers are like this--but for the

Ones who are ____ ____ ____ ____ ____

************************

************************


Shelter

By Leonore Mathews

Who would know or care

That I needed shelter

as the wind and rain

played games

on the roof of my old

"Chevy"

Winter brought rain drops

from a leaky roof

dripping slowly on the front

seat

Nesting in a sleeping bag

usually warm and comfy

Who would know or care

that me of all creatures

needed shelter.

Early Dawn

by Leonore Mathews

Bring back the dawn soon

but not too late

so dancing black shadows

will fade

as glossy sunbeams kiss

our faces

and we can once more

join the human race

forgetting we are homeless.

Tags