Story Archives 2000

EMERGENCY

09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
root
Original Body

by Leroy Moore

We have an emergency on our hands
Do you understand
Sisters and mothers
Aunts and Grandmothers
Are crying, shouting and yelling

Help! Please help!
Ignored, oppressed and abused
Disabled women of color
Needs you

On the streets
Can you believe
The state has sterilized me
Divorce from my husband, family and community

Beaten on
Kicked out
Shot up
No sirens, no ambulance, nobody gives a fuck

Emergency, HELP, emergency
98% unemployment rate
Sisters don’t want to relate
Very hard to live in this society

Grown up with violence
Father in my bed
|Billie-club upside my head
The only way to make money is to give head

My father was my first
My cell-mate was my second and

My x was my last
Still waiting for my first love
Caught between two worlds
Limping and pushing to the boarder
Disabled woman an easy target for the INS
Disabled immigrant woman can’t be a citizen of the US

Social promotion
Another year in special education
Can’t read the job application
Race, sex and disability discrimination

Margarett L. Mitchell shot by LAPD
Vijai Rajan rejected by the INS
Ya Fang Li roughed up by SFPD
Can’t you see there is an emergency in our society

Disabled women of color
Living under pressure
We need some answers
Time is ticking and we are sick of waiting

It’s time to take a stand
No more lines in the sand
We need a bulletproof plan
Sisters’ our blood is on your hands

Disabled women of color
It’s time to speak our anger
We need to educate our sisters, brothers and leaders
We can only get stronger if we come together

Living under a state of emergency
Disabled women of color tell your story
We belong to three communities
Listen to our history

Harriet Tubman led slaves to freedom
Fredia Kahlo painted her pain
Alicia Alonso danced through the light and darkness
Wilma Mankiller taught her people community organizing

Disabled women of color
It’s time to plan for our future
Break the silence
We have no time for this nonsense

Tags

I STEP ON THE SCENE

09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
root
Original Body

Poetry/Journal on The Protest at Next Door shelter

by Po’ Poet Charles Pitts

I STEP ON THE SCENE

SAY HI TO A FEW FRIENDS

PROTEST A LITTLE

YEA

WE NEED SOME NEW PROTEST CHANTS

MAYBE DR. DRE COULD GIVE US SOME BEATS

A CAB PULLS UP

YOU CAN SEE THE BLOOD ON HER FINGERS

AND A BIG PATCH OF RAW FLESH ON HER LEG

THE CABBIE IS STRUGGLING

TO GET HER TO THE SHELTER

SHE’S BARELY CONSCIOUS

I PICK THIS LADY UP

(BLEEDING LADY)

( I HOPE I DON’T DROP YOU )

TAKE HER TO THE DOOR

THAT’S WHEN I MEET THE “LOVELY DIRECTOR”

“SHE DOESN’T LIVE HERE “ I am told

“COULD YOU CHECK? I ask

SHE JUST GOT HERE FROM THE HOSPITAL”

“I’M THE ACTING DIRECTOR” I am told

“WE KNOW OUR CLIENTS “

“SHE DOES NOT LIVE HERE “

“I’M SORRY “

Tags

Alana Watts (Southern Ute)

09/24/2021 - 11:45 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
root
Original Body

by Boys and Girls Club of the Southern Ute Indian Tribe

Alana Watts

Slam Bio


Blue Sweet

Apples

Smooth

Im a grizzley bear

Strong

Southern Ute

Strong

Ignacio

I live in a big house

I struggle with loving

My mom and my dad

I live with my mama

She’s a single mama raising two kids

Just so hard

Love is pink

Fighting is hard

Tags

Project 20 or more poverty

09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
root
Original Body

The Mayor doesn't "like" Project 20 anymore, which means the people have to fight to keep it alive

by Tiny/PoorNewsNetwork

The mouth of the Truck had teeth

Large white porcelin teeth stained with blood

my blood, mi sangri

which dripped down its metal jaws into rivers of solid black rubber

Rubber that became the soles of boots on the feet of marching soldiers

who first took my apartment, then

mi vida

Wheels that shook the earth, mi tierra,

and plowed down the land, mi tierra

Dark turning wheels on my tongue

maybe if I licked their boots they wouldn’t take my home, my car, mi vida

Wheels by Tiny/Po' Poets Project at POOR Magazine

Not so many years ago my mother and I were living through a different kind of poverty. A poverty that was even more precarious, fraught with Driving While Poor(DWP) violations, (i.e.,: sleeping in our vehicle and/or overnight parking, expired registration, broken taillight, et al), "camping" citations and or loitering (i.e., being homeless in public). Why? Because my mother and I were a homeless family and its illegal to be homeless in Amerikka.

One of the enemies of low-income, working poor and houseless folks is The Department of Parking and Traffic, aka DPT and their hand-maidens; The Tow Companies, as they are the enforcers, along with cops, of the Driving While Poor Violations, and the subsequent theft of poor peoples' vehicles, houses on wheels and/or belongings

Both of these industries employ a lot of low-income folks so it is important to distinguish between the slave and the master. And one of the most concrete examples of that is the fact that the current master, residing in the San Francisco Mayors Office used to be head of Department of Parking and Traffic, i.e., our own Gavin Newsom.

When my mother and I were living in our car, we would lose "our homes" all the time to the metallic jaws of the Tow Companies, ordered alternately by DPT officers and cops. And then when we couldn't afford to buy another hooptie to replace what they had stole so many times over, we ended up "on the street" getting the "camping" citations.

"Have you ever signed up to Project 20 to work off your tickets?" One dark morning after one of these thefts I pushed a gallon of tears into the back of my parched throat and got on the phone for the hundredth time and requested some kind of help. This time I called the right person. I reached the Coalition on Homelessness who had a staff attorney who had suggested that I could sign up to a program called Project 20 and "work off" the fines I owed by volunteering at a non-profit organization

Within what seemed like seconds I was in the Project 20 office being interviewed by a very kind African descendent man who laid out the whole program and gave me a referral to work off several hundred hours with the United Farm workers, one of many non-profit organizations approved to work with the San Francisco Pre-Trial Diversion Project aka Project 20

July 2005

" The Mayor (Newsom) doesn't like project 20, he think it takes money away from City, and he wants to get rid of it" Fast foreward to present day, my family is still very low-income, but thanks to a kind landlord who doesn't evict us every time we can't pay the rent on time, we are housed. I have at least three jobs (and barely make ends meet) and one of them includes driving and this is San Francisco where the Parking and traffic people seem to outnumber the residents so I still get way too many tickets and must sign up to Project 20 when I can't afford to pay them, which is most of the time….

Two weeks ago I walked into Project 20 to sign up a gaggle of tickets I have accumulated on my driving job and was informed by one of the workers that Mayor Newsom doesn't "like" the program anymore. She went on, " Its been like a grave yard in here, cause they (DPT) aren't referring anyone here," and then she paused and looked around nervously, " I'm already worried about losing my job"

"Really," I answered, "so what's happening with the program?"

She continued conspiratorially, " Well, to try to make the Mayor a little happier with the program we are sending people to Department of Public Works to do %50 of their hours and then they can do the rest with a non-profit… Its great because you can get more credit per hour for any work you do with DPW"

"Well in my case that would be really hard cause I would have to pay for child care while I worked for DPW, and I can't afford child care as it is"

She continued un-phased, "It’s the only way, cause then the money goes back to the City and the Mayor won't discontinue the program.." With her last nervous assertion she shoved a contract for DPW in front of me and handed me a pen.

As my weary of povertyandstruggle feet walked out of the building I wasn't sure who to feel sorrier for; the wonderful, real talkin mostly African Descendent employees of the Project 20 'program who were at-risk of being unemployed if Mr. Newsom didn't get happier, or all the houseless, working poor and even middle-class residents of San Francisco who rely on Project 20 to allow them to work off their tickets and therefore keep their cars or the many really great non-profit organizations who rely on the help provided to them by project 20 workers.

After I left and gulped down my fear/sorrow, I got mad. I called the non-profit organization I was dealing with and they called Department of Parking and Traffic to find out what was going on. Within minutes I got a call back. It seems that the whole DPW push was not official and after further investigation, neither was the Mayors "dislike" of the program.

Apparently the Mayor had held a private meeting about his sentiments and it was never supposed to "go public" . Following DPT's promise to rescind my DPW "contract" I attempted to get a comment on the whole situation from the Mayors office, DPT and Project 20, and now that I was representing the "Press" no-one would answer my calls

The moral of the story, Fight Back, cause as most of the readers of The Bayview, and PNN know, if we don't keep fighting for it - they- and there's always a they- will take it away…

Note To readers: The only way to keep Project 20 alive and well is to keep asking for it and if you get "pushed" into a DPW contract refuse it and call POOR Magazine @(415) 863-6306. To read more journalism on issues of poverty and racism by the folks who experience it first-hand go on-line to www.poormagazine.org

Tags

POOR/PNN statement on Brother Leonards Parole Denial

09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
root
Original Body

POOR Magazine denounces the denial of parole for Indigenous elder, scholar, activist and protector of Turtle Island Leonard Peltier by the United States Parole Commission

by POOR Magazine/PNN staff & family

POOR Magazine denounces the denial of parole for Indigenous elder, scholar, activist and protector of Turtle Island Leonard Peltier by the United States Parole Commission. Peltier's parole hearing was his first since 1994. His next hearing is scheduled in 2024, when he will be 79 years old. Leonard Peltier has spent more than 3 decades in prison for the killing of 2 FBI agents on the Pine Ridge Reservation in South Dakota 1975. Despite evidence and thousands of pages of documents that would prove his innocence, the US justice system has perpetuated its culture of vengeance, not only against Leonard Peltier but against all political prisoners and indigenous peoples of Turtle Island. Poor Magazine recognizes and has implemented the UN Declaration on Indigenous People that states that indigenous people have a right to remain on and have control of the land and to the resources thereof. Poor Magazine stands in solidarity with the American Indian Movement (AIM), United Native Americans and millions of supporters worldwide in resistance to the warehousing and ownership of people to fuel and propagate the prison industrial complex (PIC). We call on the millions of Leonard Peltier supporters to not give up the fight to contact President Barack Obama and demand a full pardon for our brother and elder Leonard Peltier

Tags

Who Are These People???

09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
root
Original Body

Calworks Moms protest new fingerprinting
program in State Welfare System.

by Scott Clark

"You have no right to be here, who are you people?",
said Will Lightbourne, director of San Francisco
Department of Human Services. This statement was
his first attempt to dislodge a small group of
protesting mothers and their advocates from his
office.

The recent passing of Mother's Day seemed to add
considerable weight to an action against the
Department of Human Services (DHS). On May 15,
2000, at 1:30pm, a group of about twenty
demonstrators met in the small office of POWER
(People Organized to Win Employment Rights), 126
Hyde St. in San Francisco. The protestors consisted
of Mothers on TANF (Temporary Assistance for
Needy Families), working poor Mothers, former
TANF recipients, Foodstamps recipients, and family
welfare advocates.

The reason for the meeting was to plan an action in
response to the implementation of a rigorous
fingerprinting system for recipients of CalWorks
(TANF) and Foodstamps, which was announced by
DHS to be taking place this very same day. The main
concern with the new fingerprinting system is that
DHS will share fingerprint data with other
government agencies, such as the INS (Immigration
and Naturalization Service) and CPS (Child
Protective Services).

The meeting proceeded with a roundtable of
introductions in English and Spanish, followed by a
few minutes of strategizing and answering questions
in the same bilingual fashion. By 2:15pm the group
had split into two factions. The groups were about
equally sized, one headed off to the office of Will
Lightbourne at 170 Otis St., the other to sit in on the
regular Monday 2pm Board of Supervisors meeting
at City Hall.

The conference with Will Lightbourne was brought
about with some argument from Will himself. To his
understanding, he had done the right thing in an
expedient fashion, putting his new fingerprint system
to work as quickly and substantially as possible,
justifying the departmental outlay of the money it
took to purchase the system. In doing this, he was in
accordance with state law, which allows counties to
implement fingerprinting and share the information
with other counties in order to prevent fraud. So,
when this collection of families and advocates
showed up without an appointment and demanded to
meet with him, he did his best to shoo them back out
of his personal offices.

They, however, refused to leave. It was unlikely that
Mr. Lightbourne would have showed up for an
appointment....... even if they had had one. He had a
reputation for not showing up when anyone had any
complaint at all. And they had come to do some
serious complaining.

The mere process of getting to his offices and then
getting him to acknowledge their presence had caused
the group to expend considerable creative effort.
They had bypassed the front desk security by coming
in through the parking lot elevators. Up to the eighth
floor went the bulk of the procession; the drivers of
the three cars they had come in were still parking. By
the time that the last two members of the group,
Steve Williams and another member of POWER, had
arrived upstairs, Mr. Lightbourne had made the
escape from his own front office, and was attempting
to hide (or maybe just take a deep breath) in the hall
bathroom. He might better have picked one with a
lock on the door, because Steve found him soon
enough. Steve calmly told him "Look, we're here
because we need to talk to you, and we're not going
away."

So the two of them headed back to the front office. Once
there, Will totally ignored the group, and again attempted
avoidance via the connected employees’ offices. The group
followed him, asking what the problem was, and why
wouldn’t he talk to them. He mumbled something about not
having an appointment and having to get back to work.
They came back around full circle again to the front area,
which included his personal office. He slipped in there and
attempted to close the door on them, but instead
encountered someone's foot, which kept the door from
closing.

Rebecca Vilkommerson of the Homeless Prenatal Program
(HPP) responded; "We have every right to be here, and
you need to find time right now to talk to us, because we’re
not leaving until you do." The group had brought signs
denouncing Mr. Lightbourne’s methods in respect to
making changes in DHS, not only as regards
fingerprinting. They were there to argue with his self-will;
he had paid no attention thus far to requests by this same
group of people to apply for a waiver from the state. This
waiver would allow for delaying fingerprint requirements
for up to two years. He had also ignored the waivers that
had been granted or were being requested by a number of
surrounding counties in Northern California.

These failings were pointed out to him again after he had
led his opponents into the building auditorium to proceed
with their griefs. They hung their signs on the walls and
took to the front of the room, while he took a front and
center seat, a wary or weary-looking audience of one. He
listened to them mostly in silence. At one point in the
discourse he started to try to respond to some things being
said by a mother with her toddler-aged daughter; he got as
far as "But, but, but...", before the mom resumed
speaking; then she was cut off by her baby repeating, "buh,
buh, buh". Everybody but Will thought this was pretty
funny.

To follow up on the action at 170 Otis St., this group was
to rendezvous with its other half, the complainants who
were to present these same problems to City Hall. The
Supervisors meeting had been dragging along on some land
use issues, and had not yet come to the portion of the
agenda allowing for public comment. This situation turned
the day’s momentum to an advantage.

The protestors who had just arrived from Otis St., when
they got to the City Hall building, went first to the office of
Tom Ammiano, who has been the City’s #1 responsive ally
when it comes to issues of family and immigrant rights.
There, they found Brad Benson, Tom’s assistant. They
explained their situation, and what had happened at DHS.
Brad agreed to work with them to write up a resolution for
presentation to the Board of Supervisors. They gathered the
rest of their consort from the Board conference room, and
Brad seated everybody comfortably in Tom’s spacious
office. He addressed the group briefly, letting them know
he was out to help them get this situation dealt with today in
an agreeable fashion. There were two lawyers present
within the group; Julia Greenfield from the Lawyer’s
Committee, and Eve Stotland from Bay Area Legal Aid.
They, together with a CalWorks mom (and member of
POWER) and Brad, collaborated to get the resolution typed
in legal language for presentation to the Board. When it
was typed and printed, the group in Tom’s office listened
to it read, and voted, approving it unanimously. The
resolution was for the Board to order the DHS to delay
fingerprinting, and to apply for a waiver from the state until
such a time as controls could be implemented, disallowing
the DHS from sharing such information with other
unapproved agencies, either Federal or State.

The lateness of the afternoon, however, did not allow for it
to be brought before the Board on that day so a promise
was garnered from Brad, and in Tom Ammiano’s name, to
present it to the Board at the next regular meeting of the
board. The group left the scene happily, looking as if
Mother's Day had been extended an extra day.

For more information call POWER at (415)776-9379 or
HPP at 546-6756.

Tags

Mom-Pop Bookstores

09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
root
Original Body

Chain Stores have an
Achilles Heel their size, and
sheer volume can be turned
against them.

by Staff Writer

Last Friday in the San Francisco Chronicle I read independent booksellers didn’t do well in the Antitrust case against Borders, Barnes & Nobles Book stores.

I’m not going into details, lets say U.S. District Judge William H. Orrick saw the big chain’s view.

What can small independent book sellers do?
Yes. Barns, Borders, Crown, and other giants have blocks of room for volumes of new and popular works, large advertising budgets, and coffee shops for patrons wanting to slow down to sip their hot tan to black liquid with pastry, bagel, English muffin, French or American Toast.

Where did the coffee shop idea come from? It was originally from modest independent bookseller’s with innovative ways of thinking.

They had to compete against other shops for customers.

Most if not all big chains think:bottom-line, what will get people to buy and not browse, bigger=better is their notion and if coffee shops, bar and bakery combos will get the public in they’ll spend the money raising/cutting prices on food items for added cash revenue.

Big Book chains are Glitzy, posh, expensive, and slightly innovative. How can independent booksellers compete? They don’t; like successful Mom& Pop or one-owner bookstores of the past they can do-be innovative, different in ways huge chains cannot.

Remember "The Purple Onion" or "Hungry Eye" in the 1950’s and 60’s with poets, comedians individual stand-up or groups and of course authors of various works.

Then there is malt shops, PC, I-net spaces and independents joining for a better diversified customer base.

Not following the chain crowd could be what saves independents. It seems when chains have a successful model they don’t change they tend to look the same and if an ordinary behind-the-counter has an idea dumb or brilliant she/he may not be listened to because of the Chain-of-Command top-down structure of most chains.

in a small shop with four or less people one person with a dumb or brilliant idea can ask the boss too without c-o-c wait and his or her idea can be tried.

Think of chain bookstores as slow moving monoliths that may communicate swiftly with other monoliths but c-o-c’s make ‘em get in their own way.

Sometimes bigger is better and at other times what is wanted and needed is
a small nook for books not well known, like small diamonds and gems constantly overlooked.

remember all new books get old eventually and big chains have to move their products.

Small stores with combo café’s, author visits, PC-net services will always be an alternative to large chains because readers are interested in so many kinds of books that chain stores may disdain or dislike not taking the effort because of adverse publicity.

>p>The "If its not here its not anywhere" attitude will no longer be applied as long as independents say. "These ideas, works, authors, theories, whatever are here for readers, not for big chains to pick and choose what our tastes are to fill their already full coffers.

Please send donations to Poor Magazine
C/0 Ask Joe at 255 9th St. Street,
San Francisco, CA. 94103 USA

For Joe only my snail mail:
PO Box 1230 #645
Market St.
San Francisco, CA 94102
Email: askjoe@poormagazine.org

Tags

Genomics Divide

09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
root
Original Body

Healthcare for all sponsors a discussion on Cuba's biotech Industry

by Andy DellaRocca/PNN Media intern

"Andy, grab yourself something to eat." I was startled to hear somebody
call me by my first name. How did this woman know my name? Why was she so
concerned about my diet? I then remembered the name tag that I had been
given at the front entrance, on which I wrote "Andy: Poornewsnetwork." The
tag hung from my upper chest, and as I sat in the wooden fold-up chair in
Susan Cieutat's living room, I pondered how nice it would be if we all wore
name tags, all of the time. "Please, you must be hungry."

I wasn't at all hungry, I had just eaten. But after a third person
requested that I take advantage of the platter that was spread out in the
dining room, I rose and squeezed past the others to arrive at the table.
There before me stood a table full of bagels, cream cheese, and fruit salad.
"Have you been eating enough fruit?" rang my mother's voice in my head,
and despite the affirmative responses I've always given her, I knew that I
hadn't been, so I filled my plate with blueberries, bananas, melon, and
apples, and went back to my seat. I ate the food quickly, eager to get back
to reading the pamphlets that were handed to me concerning Oregon's
comprehensive Health Care Finance Act, Universal Health Care in San
Francisco, and the Universal Single Payer Health Care Resolution. As I read
these, and ate my fruit, I thought about how justified my mother's concerns
were, both that I was living without a health plan, and that I didn't eat
enough fruit.

"I have to pay $100 dollars to find out if I still have cancer? That's
immoral," Jose Ramirez, a Cuban emigrant, now living in the United States,
told us he had said to a doctor from whom he received treatment in the past,
and who had presented to him a bill for a medical exam. We were all
introducing ourselves, and when I heard the statement by Jose, I realized
that I'd better start the tape recorder.

Health Care For All San Francisco, a local non-profit group, was hosting
this event in Susan Cieutat's living room. Amongst the tall bookcases that
lined the walls of her bright home sat about 25 adults of all ages, who
represented a variety of organizations such as the Gray Panthers, Neighbor
to Neighbor, and Health Care for All. The featured guest was Anne
Sunderland, who works for the Institute of Global Health at the University
of California, San Francisco. She recently attended the World Health
Organization's conference on biotechnology and health in Havana, Cuba, and
was here to speak about Cuba's biotech industry, as well as the state of
health care around the world. My tape recorder whirred as she stood up to
speak.

"Although it's relatively easy to be unaware of this while living in the
United States, we are really living in a time of great crisis in terms of
health around the world. And this crisis is fueled in large part by what
are referred to as 'diseases of poverty'. These are infectious diseases
that disproportionally affect poorer regions of the world."

Her discussion had begun, and she outlined for us the statistics that many
of our brothers and sisters are coping with in the more impoverished areas
of the world. Ten to fourteen million people dead of infectious diseases
each year, 90% of whom live in developing countries. Sixty-five to 75% of
the 40 million individuals infected with HIV live in sub-Saharan Africa.
Ninety percent of the one to two million malaria deaths that occur each year
are children, under the age of five, living in the same region. And two
million people die each year of tuberculosis. The numbers are astounding.

"Imagine looking around the room today and knowing that, without a doubt,
one in every four of us was HIV positive."

The room was overwhelmingly filled with middle-class white folks, and I was
fairly confident that very few of those around me, if any, were infected
with the virus. In sub-Saharan Africa however, almost everyone would be
poor and black, and one in four would be positive.

"How many of you in the room have been impacted by tuberculosis, or have had
a loved one impacted?" Anne asked.

Two hands went into the air, and one of the women that raised hers conceded
that it were elephants in the zoo which she knew were infected.

Anne explained that much of the disparity between health care systems around
the world is due, in large part, to the lack of biotech industry in
developing countries. Biotechnology is the application of biological
knowledge and techniques to create new products and technologies. It is the
medical implications of this technology that is relevant to international
health. Vaccines, for example, are a biotechnological creation. The
establishment of biotech industries in richer countries, and the absence of
such industry in poorer ones, has been labeled the "genomics divide."

"Only 1% of the new drugs that were brought to market between 1975 and 1997
were developed specifically for a disease of poverty. Why is this
happening? Well, essentially, most of the biotech capacity, in terms of
technology and infrastructure and funding and trained scientists, just
resides in the developed world. Many of these resources reside in companies
of the developed world which function in market economies, where making a
profit is the overwhelming objective.

"Despite the huge numbers of potential patients in the developing world for
treatment for a disease of poverty, they don't necessarily represent BUYERS,
or customers, in the fact that neither they, nor their government in many
cases, can afford to pay the prices that the drug companies feel they need
to charge to recoup their investment costs to get a profit... to give you
the background of the INDUSTRY perspective of why this market failure has
occurred and is continuing to occur."

Cuba is important because it stands as an exception to the rule of the
genomics divide. Cuba's biotech industry is extensive. This is due to the
country's leader, Fidel Castro's, commitment to health and the health
sciences and his continued investment in the biotech sector. Even during
the 1990's, after the collapse of the Soviet Union and the economic aid for
Cuba that went with it, Fidel put one billion dollars into the industry.

What has been the result of this investment? The development of original
vaccines for certain forms of hepatitis and meningitis. The production of
generic drugs which have been exported to regions of the world where the
high prices demanded by the biotech corporations of the industrialized world
cannot be paid.

Cuba's health system has treated many individuals from outside of Cuba.
Persons from the Ukraine, who were affected by the Chernobyl disaster, went
to Cuba for treatment. Many Americans have likewise been treated by the
Cuban health system.

"We are really talking about a needs-based system where the health needs of
the citizens dictate what products are researched or developed by the
industry. The meningitis vaccine, for example, was developed after an
outbreak of meningitis in the 1970s."

As she said this, I couldn't help but think about the way that the market
has failed to address the health needs of the capitalist world. At POOR, we
once discussed "sleeping sickness," a disease for which there is a very
simple treatment. However, many people throughout the poorer regions of the
world continued to die from the disease. The cure, in the meantime, was no
longer being produced, because it was deemed unprofitable. Once the drug
was discovered to help relieve acne, however, companies began to produce it
once again. Only because well-to-do adolescents were worried about
"pizza-face" were impoverished individuals in the poor world allowed access
to the easy treatment of sleeping disease.

The state-run health system of Cuba, which is free to all of its citizens,
has resulted in infant mortality rates and life expectancy rates almost
identical to those in the US, "despite the fact that Cuba continues to live
in what we consider third world poverty, in terms of material poverty,"
emphasized Anne.

The successes of Cuba's health sector lies in stark contrast to the
deficiencies of the United States health care system, where I've been denied
coverage because of a past bout with bronchitis, and where Jose needs to
fork over $100 for his doctor to tell him the results of his cancer test. I
looked around the room and saw many seniors in the chairs, listening to Anne
talk. Some of them may be dealing with health issues as we speak. Perhaps
their retirement portfolios have dissolved in the wake of the Wall Street
scandals. Who is going to provide them with the necessary health care? If
I break my foot and can no longer work my job, will I need to go onto the
street because I can't cover my medical expenses?

Health Care for All has been advocating a Universal Single Payer Health Care
Resolution for the state of California. To learn more, check their website
at www.healthcareforall.org.

Tags

How Much Freer is Free?

09/24/2021 - 11:45 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
root
Original Body

To Legalize or De-criminalize - Brother Y investigates what will hurt poor people and micro-business people the most

by Brother Y/PNN

I am fond of saying and will continue to state that government is like a theif at night who steals your wallet at night but by day break say’s “ c’mon buddy let’s go find the sum’bitch who stole your wallet no one treats my friends like that!”

Such is the case with the current initiative by California lawmakers to legalize,

Tax and regulate the use of marijuana for all state residents 21 or older.

The criminalization / legalization of marijuana has always’s been a civil rights issue.

The first law on record making marijuana illegal started as a city ordinance in

El Paso, Texas was used to target Mexican immigrants.

Due to the fact that there were no law’s against immigrating to the United States

During that time period white racist looked for the only way to discriminate against

Them and apparently this is the only thing that stood out.

In 1913 the state of California was the first state to make marijuana illegal,

Due to pressure from the pharmiceutical industry because of the competition!

In 1914 Utah followed suit due to a Mormon religious prohibition.

By 1930 30 stattes made it illegal, the greatest fear being they felt herion addiction

Would lead to marijuana, that’s not a typo you read that right!

During congessional hearings only 2 medical doctors were present the first one was the representative of the American Medical Association he was told to shut up and leave because he stated that there was no proof that marijuana was a dangerous drug.

The second was James Munch who injected 300 dogs with extract of marijuana 2 of which died.

When asked his conclusion he said he did not know.

Later he testified in court under oath that marijuana would make your fangs grow 6 inches and drip blood, and when he tried it turned him into a bat!

He served as the U.S. official “expert” on marijuana from 1938 until 1962.

AS far as common sense goes the greater issue’s at hand are 1. Many people who are voting age would not or could not benefit from the legalization of marijuana.

At the tender age of 17 with the permission of their parents or guardians young people could “die for their country” without ever being able to legally try marijuana regardless as to whether they inhale or not as a certain cowardly draft dodger claimed not to have done!

2.Many young people could spend the rest of their lives behind bars after being tried and convicted as adults again without ever being able to legally try weed, which could in some cases prevent them being placed in the cicumstance’s that could lead to their conviction to begin with.

3. The legalization of industrial hemp is far more imperative to the economy of the

California, The United States and a competive world market.

The arrogance and selfishness of man has lead to the eradication of many animal and plant species, and caused an imbalance to the eco system.

For all we know “legalizing” hemp could help bring back the honey bee!

It is a much better option to decriminalize 6 oz. or less marijuana for those 18 and above

Using monies confiscated from harsher drugs to provide funding for addiction education

During primary education and treatment on demand, instead of adding more and more taxes to treat the ills of society.

In reality the only ones who would benefit from the legalization of marijuana would be government fat cats, big business and a bunch of rich white guy’s who own the majority of the cannabis clubs.

‘nuff said

Brother Y!

Tags

One if by Land, Two if by Budget Cut

09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
root
Original Body

by Bruce Allison and Thorton Kimes

SSI and SSP will be cut by $20 a month beginning July, 2009. This will create a deficit in the personal budgets of anyone with a disability, or seniors enrolled in those programs. California pays $200 more on these grants than the federal government, which gives The Governator room to cut and still give more than other states. The President’s Stimulus package makes it possible for the cut to be only $5 a month by this poverty scholar’s math.

Other cuts devastating to poor folks include cutting home care workers’ pay from $11 to $9 per hour. Many home care workers are providing services for their own parents or other relatives in need of their help; many home care workers provide these services instead of working in other fields for more money--they could even have ended up being some of the people we love to hate for the current state of the economy, except that they had a conscience and chose to help family.

These workers have been helping the California economy by keeping them at home instead of in more expensive nursing facilities. A great example of this is Poor Magazine’s own Tiny Lisa Gray Garcia, who was her own mother’s care giver as well as being a mother herself—and running a fabulous publication—before becoming Communications Director of Justice Matters, a non-profit advocacy organization that helps youth of color get a better education.

People who receive MediCal benefits are also going under the knife, as the Governator is now calling dentistry, vision, podiatry, chiropractic, acupuncture, and some psychiatric out-patient services “cosmetic”. This will inevitably take patients straight to the Emergency Room of the nearest hospital, spending the money Schwarzenegger wants to save anyway.

Last of the knife cuts is to families of three or more, cutting their monthly CalWorks grant from $760 to $690. Many of my friends and Poor Magazine co-writers will be enduring this particular indignity. After paying the rent and utilities there will only be $300 left to get through the month. This is tough for a single person to do, let alone a family.

Please think of them as having some dignity in their lives. It is hard enough to ask someone else for help, they did not ask for this and do not deserve it. Please ask/demand that the Governator change these decisions, as there are other cuts he could make to save money that wouldn’t hurt anyone. Disabled and Senior folks in the state prison system could be paroled and save approximately $100 million.

There are some other solutions this poverty scholar would like to make, but they are not very polite, so dear readers, you must use your imaginations. Consider this article an exercise in anger management!


Tags