Story Archives

Angle of Bullets Called Suspicious

09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
root
Original Body

by Tom Jackman and Jamie Stockwell

(Reprinted from the Washington Post, courtesy of chris98@pacbell.net)

The shots by a Prince George's police officer that struck and killed a Hyattsville man in Fairfax County last week entered the man's back at a 45-degree downward angle, which attorneys for Prince C. Jones's family said indicates that he was hit as he was driving away, down a hill.

The findings, from a private autopsy performed for the man's family, seem to contradict police statements that Cpl. Carlton B. Jones, an undercover narcotics detective, fired into the back of Prince Jones's Jeep as it rammed the unmarked police Mitsubishi Montero.

Ted J. Williams, a lawyer representing Prince Jones's family and a former D.C. homicide detective, questioned whether the officer was seated in his vehicle when the shots were fired. According to Williams, the autopsy found that Prince Jones was shot five times in the back and once in the forearm, also from the back.

But Fairfax Commonwealth's Attorney Robert F. Horan Jr. said yesterday that "we have one independent witness who puts the police officer in the vehicle when he shoots. I don't think there's any question the officer was in the vehicle." Horan would not identify the witness.

Horan attributed the downward trajectory of the bullets to the detective's Montero being "slightly higher. He's above where the other guy [Prince Jones] is." He said the trajectory "all depends on where the guy [Prince Jones] sits."

Manufacturers' specifications show that the difference in the vehicles' heights is about four inches.

Williams said that if Prince Jones was backing up when he was shot, "some of the bullets would've hit him in the side."

"When you look at where the bullet wounds are, that to me is consistent with him moving away, looking ahead, not having his body in a contorted or twisted manner," Williams said.

Fairfax police, who are conducting a criminal investigation of the shooting, would not respond to Williams's theory. They have not released any results of the official autopsy.

The FBI is conducting a separate criminal investigation to determine whether Prince Jones's civil rights were violated, and there is also an internal investigation by Prince George's police. Carlton Jones, 32, who is on leave with pay, has been questioned by Fairfax police, but not by Prince George's officials.

The investigations come as Prince George's County officers have shot 12 people in the past 13 months--five of them fatally--and two other persons have died in police custody. At the same time, Justice Department officials say they are moving toward expanding the federal civil rights probe of the Prince George's canine unit to include the entire department.

Royce Holloway, spokesman for the Prince George's police, would not comment on the findings of the family's attorneys and deferred all calls to Fairfax County police. He said the department will not issue any statements until the investigation is complete.

Prince Jones, 25, a personal trainer at Bally's Total Fitness in Prince George's Plaza and a student at Howard University, was shot and killed about 3 a.m. last Friday. Carlton Jones and his supervisor followed Prince Jones's Jeep from Chillum, across the District and into the Seven Corners area of Fairfax County.

Prince George's Police Chief John S. Farrell said this week that the detectives were following the Jeep after receiving a tip that it could be connected to the theft of a police service weapon. Farrell said that the officers did not know who was driving the vehicle and were following it merely to find out where it was going.

He said that because officers did not plan to stop or confront the driver, they did not notify Fairfax officials that they had entered the county.

Farrell suggested that the detective may have feared for his life as his vehicle was being rammed, possibly justifying the use of deadly force. Prince George's police policy specifically prohibits shooting from one vehicle at another if the other vehicle is only ramming the police car.

Gregory D. Lattimer, another attorney for Prince Jones's family, said that if Prince Jones was driving in reverse into the Montero when the officer fired, there should be gunpowder residue on the glass particles blown into Jones's Jeep by the shots.

Williams theorized that Prince Jones, "in fear, not knowing who this person was, clearly seeing that it was not a police officer, may have backed into the person's vehicle in an effort to leave the area."

"Out of his own fear," Williams said, "he may very well have had some contact with the police vehicle, trying to get away in a very frightening moment."

Holloway, the Prince George's police spokesman, said that nothing restricts an officer from traveling across jurisdictions to conduct an investigation. Until the officer feels it is necessary to take action, he does not have to contact local authorities.

Area attorneys said that while the surveillance of Prince Jones was not unusual, the shooting--several jurisdictions away--was clearly rare.

"Absent the shooting, there was nothing unusual about the incident," said Robert C. Bonsib, a Washington defense lawyer.

Bonsib said that many questions surround the case and that the "whole point of a surveillance is to not be seen."

Said James Klimaski, a lawyer in the District who has represented several plaintiffs in alleged police misconduct cases: "I haven't seen anything like this other than what happens with a hot pursuit. You have officers who shoot suspects in their own jurisdiction, but to cross the county line and take action like that without notifying the local authorities, that's just very rare."

Earlier this week, attorneys for a Laurel man filed a $10 million lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Greenbelt against Prince George's police and a dozen individual officers, alleging that undercover narcotics detectives followed him into Anne Arundel County, pulled him from his car and beat him.

Brian Romjue, 19, alleges in the lawsuit that he was stopped on Brock Bridge Road last September, forced into an unmarked vehicle and driven to an unknown location. He said that an officer grabbed him by the collar and hit his head, while another officer slammed his head into the passenger side window.

The officers named in the lawsuit are Sgt. Steven Piazzi, Sgt. Kevin Davis, Sgt. Joseph McCann, Capt. Buddy Robshaw and eight other unidentified men.

"This lawsuit is twofold: We are seeking the money because Brian needs long-term psychiatric care, and we hope that the Prince George's police take responsibility for these illegal actions committed by the officers," attorney Barbara R. Graham said yesterday.

A county attorney did not return a telephone request for comment.

Holloway said that an internal investigation into that incident is being conducted.

Tags

Homeless in Osaka

09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
root
Original Body

Homeless squatters evicted from Nagai Park, in Osaka Japan.

by HOMELESS PEOPLE'S NETWORK

Special Resolution over the Issue of Nagai Park

Concerning the construction of the shelter in Nagai park, Sumiyoshi, Osaka,
the struggle have been still continuing. Osaka, as the second largest city
in Japan, has the most number of people forced to live on the street. Those
homeless people are found mainly in the parks round the Osaka Castle and
Ogimachi, in the midst of Down Town, on the riverside, or in Kamagasaki, the
biggest pool of day-labourers. Among them, Nagai Park envisages more than
400 comrades' lives in tents without any alternative housing provided
properly. Like in other places, years have mercilessly passed without any
substantive countermeasures against such a condition by the authority. Hence
the comrades in the park have made a bare living mostly by can collecting,
supporting each other with some sort of mutual-aids, say, in the unit of
small groups.

Though having enough knowledge about these situations of these homeless,
which the case in Nagai Park represents, Osaka administration have coped
with this issue in the most undesirable way, so far. Under the title of
Rehabilitation Project, they always put priority on the policies for the
press and the neighbour citizens, neglecting the homeless people involved.
Never excusable is this disdainful attitude toward the comrades in the Nagai
Park, which is trampling on others situated likewise in the whole country,
too. We are finally combined with the comrades from other areas of Osaka
like Kamagasaki and Kita, while those amounts near to 200 in the meanwhile,
who have been expelled out of the park because of their rejecting of the
project by the administrator. (The number includes those who got the
alternative housing by the livelihood protection, though). As a result of
our solidarity, the homeless comrades in the Park and other places have
successfully won the assurance on the side of the authority, that they
should not execute any compulsive eviction any longer, besides apologising
for having neglected the people involved.

However, the different issues remain still unsolved in terms of; the evicted
people who rejected the resettlement into the prefab camp prepared by the
administrator; the utterance of the administrator to imply some eviction at
the account meeting with the neighbour citizens; the shelter construction
opposed by the neighbourhood; and the firm cold-blooded attitude of the
Mayor Isomura despite the proposal for the national subsidy by the Minister
of Health and Welfare. All those exposes that their most projected measures
on this issue always conceal the intended eviction behind their surface
accounts to the homeless people.

We consider any kind of countermeasures against the homelessness under the
conditioned of evictions definitely false, and we must resist against that
way, pressing so-called either-or-options (Going out, otherwise evicted!) by
the administrator without any persuading alternatives, which respects the
people involved. Needless to say, it should be rather the people themselves
on the street, who have the right to decide to make use of the supply
proposed by the administrator.

We are, asking for the life with roof and job, never defeated by poverty,
and ready to welcome negotiations with the authority, provided that their
policy making process openly goes on with the mutual agreement, and proposes
some efficient measures, developing helpful environment for the
self-supporting activity. Never unacceptable is just any one-way requirement
aiming at evictions, forcing homeless comrades to remove without any
agreement and any alternative housing supports.

And we never withdraw our foot-board, obtained through the struggle against
the unjust eviction happened in Shinjuku, Tokyo in 1996. With all the
nation-wide support, we will reinforce our bonds steadily and progress steps
to win the substantive countermeasures against the problem around the
homelessness. So, let's keep our solidarity close and develop our joint
struggle over the whole country! All attendants at the conference of
National Anti-Unemployment movement.

****************************** ******************************

Plea for help from the Nagai Park Sqatters

Dear Friends,

We, the group of the homeless comrades in Nagai Park, Osaka, Japan, declare the protest against the outrageous act that the Osaka City has proceeded as the administrative enforcement to evict the homeless people (3 tents) from Nagai Park since 23. January 2001. Although the City tries to justify it with the establishment of the shelter for the homeless people constructed recently in Nagai Park, we consider this act of the City as the serious charge against the whole movement of the homeless people in Japan in the following points:

1) With a set of acts aiming at the forced eviction, Osaka City is on their side about to violate their promise with us, on 5. October 2000, not to undertake any forced eviction.
(Please refer the following Home Page in detail. http://www.jca.apc.org/nojukusha/nojiren/e-home/text/nagai001209.html)

2) If the shelter project for the homeless people must permit the clearance of the 480 tents in Nagai Park finally, this will be the worst example which would create an upsurge of more evictions in other cities of Japan that the government can justify with the establishment of shelters.

3) The shelter was originally planned not under the intention to meet urgent needs of the homeless people involved. It was rather constructed as the isolation asylum of the poor motivated by the invitation of the coming Olympic held in 2008. (Nagai Park has the stadium for the Olympic). And the eviction this time is itself a quite political scheme just before the inspection by IOC members expected soon in February.

We as survivals never give over the human dignity for roof and food. With a view to continue our struggle, we need your help from all over the world. We would appreciate, if you kindly support us in the form of letters to be sent to:

Mr. Takafumi Isomura

Mayor of Osaka City

Fax.

+81-6-6202-6961 (in charge of homeless issue) +81-6-6344-5119 (in charge of public park)

+81-6-6202-6971 (in charge of Olympic Bid) *If possible, please send the same letter to the 3 above Fax numbers.

Tags

Japan Town Gets Organized

09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
root
Original Body

Japan Town Community organizes to control their own development process.

by Liana Fabiani

It was one of those unusually hot days in San Francisco. It's rush hour and in addition, parking is absolutely terrible -(seems to be the universal gripe all around the city)-- but miraculously I get a spot right in front of the Community Center where a meeting of the Japan Town Task Force is set to start soon as I see people young and old stroll into the building. I sign my name on the sign up sheet and as I put the pen down I am given a HELLO MY NAME IS tag with a smile by a welcoming handsome middle aged Asian American man.

As I pass through the open auditorium-like doors and observe that the room has almost met it's maximum occupancy and most of the crowd consists of middle aged and senior citizens with the exception of a few of my zealous college peers. The environment is calm and comfortable as people take their seats and fix their eyes on the MC of the evening, a woman who represents the community organized and operated Japantown planning, preservation and development task force. She begins to speak informing us of the sessions introduction. Plans are then explained to us through a series of slides while representatives, hired by the JT taskforce, from BMS Design Group and Poret consulting narrate.

Through my observations during the meeting and interviews after the meeting I gathered that --The JT Taskforce, formed by a community of concerned and affected volunteers, has succeeded in launching their own idea of their communities redevelopment plan. The city has had plans to redevelop Japantown since the 1950's and the current redevelopment "leases" (I am not sure what they actually are) are close to their end. Japantown, very conscious and well organized, has rightfully stepped into the redevelopment process of their community. With the support from the mayors office and funding from SF's own redevelopment agency, the Taskforce has done their research and through their ideas and efforts of designing their own redevelopment plan, consulting support has been sought and contributed from Asian Neighborhood design, Chinatown community development center, BMS Design Group and Poret Consulting. They are now in phase 2 of their plan and funding for phase 3 is already in the works. Mrs. Mori, one of the tasks force coordinators informed me that while it was hard to find people of color in the consulting and design industry she feels like the companies that they have chosen to help design the taskforces' redevelopment plan are sensitive and understanding towards the issues of the community in Japantown. Can Japantown's answer to redevelopment work for other districts and communities in the Bay Area?

For more information contact:Japantown planning, preservation and development task force 415-346-1239
fax# 415-346-6703
email:jtowntaskforce@juno.com

Tags

One Strike

09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
root
Original Body

HUD's "one strike" eviction policy is analogous to Federally mandated gentrification

by Leo Stegman

In a case that will have a lasting and long term affect on public housing residents throughout the Western section of America, the United Sstates Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has decided to reconsider its previous ruling upholding the drug activity provision of the Oakland Housing Authority (OHA). The first to be affected by its decision to uphold this provision will be elderly tenants. They are currently fighting the eviction process which is based on a family member and/or a guest being accused of unlawful drug activity. The defendants further states that they had not known about the activities of the family member alleged by OHA.

In September of 1999, United States District Court Judge Charles Breyer issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting OHA from evicting tenants from public housing for the drug activity of their guests or member of the household, even if the tenants had no knowledge of the drug activity that allegedly took place. However, OHA appealed the District Court's ruling. In February of 2000, a three judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, by a 2-to-1 margin, reversed the lower court’s decision and upheld OHA's termination of tenancy of the four defendants. With a seldom used "en banc" procedure, a majority of the 24 judges of the Ninth Circuit voted to withdraw the previous decision of the Court, which upheld OHA's "one strike" eviction policies. The case of Rucker v. Davis will now be heard by an eleven judge "en banc" panel.

The "one strike" eviction law arise from a 1996 election-year promise by President Bill Clinton to make public housing safer for its residents. He ordered Secretary Henry Cisneros to implement a policy of guidelines, procedures, rules and regulations to make it easier to evict public housing residents accused of criminal activity. That was referred to as "one strike.”

The Clinton Administration went a step further. Working with the Republican controlled United States Congress, the self proclaimed "new Democrat,” Bill Clinton signed legislation into law that gave the public housing agencies the statutory authority to evict public housing residents that they determined to be involved in criminal- or drug-related activity.

The March 1998 amendment to the existing Federal Statutes, United States Code Services, Title 42 Section 1437(d), establishes "good cause" for terminating a resident of public housing tenancy. The statute states:

Any criminal activity that threatens the health, safety, or right to peaceful enjoyment of the premises by other tenants or any drug related activity on or off the premises, engaged by a public housing tenant, any member of tenant's household, guest of other person under tenant's control, shall be cause for termination of tenancy

This law is at the foundation of the Federal " one strike" drug activity provision. it punishes innocent public housing residents for the alleged drug activity of their family members, guests or other persons considered under their control. Not one of the four residents in the case ofRucker has knowledge of the purported drug activity that took place. In the case of Pearlie Rucker, she was given a notice of termination of tenancy after her mentally disabled daughter was arrested for possession of cocaine three blocks away from her home. Willie Lee and Barbara Hill were given eviction notices after their grandsons, who live with them, were arrested for smoking in the housing project's parking lot. In the case of the fourth tenant, of Herman Walker , who is disabled, was ordered to be evicted after his caregiver came into his home with drugs and drug paraphernlia.

Public housing officials, judges, attorneys, tenants rights advocates, and public housing residents are all eagerly awaiting the decision of this case. It will establish the type of rights public housing residents have throughout the Western United States under the drug activity provision of the "one strike" eviction laws.

Many view the "one strike" law as being draconian, cold-hearted and evil. Others view the "one strike eviction" law and policies as an attack on poor folks in a bid to gentrify public housing projects. The Department of Housing was established on November 9, 1965, under the administration of Lyndon B. Johnson. The objective was to provide affordable housing to all Americans . Many of HUD's programs provide low-interest loans to low-income, middle- and first-time home buyers. Other programs are suppose to assist low-income families and individuals in their housing needs.

Some feel that the Clinton Administration's "one strike" eviction policy is just the tool to redirect the resources of HUD to families making salaries closer to the median income levels. In San Francisco and the Bay Area, like most of the country, both rents and the prices of houses are spiraling out of control and out of the reach of even dual-income households. The purchase of a new home is out of the range of most families.

According to the Association of Bay Area Governments report, the median household income for both Alameda and San Francisco counties is approximately $67,000.The median purchase price for a house in Alameda County in July of 2000 was $340,000, according to Data Quick Information System . The median purchase price for a house in San Francisco County for July of 2000 was $470,000.

In a politically unstable economy, working class households in the Bay Area are having a harder time finding decent and affordable housing. The Clinton administration devised a federal plan to relocate the federal dollars to provided affordable and decent housing from the nations low-income households to moderate-income household which is tantamount to "Federally sponsored gentrification" of Federal public housing.

HUD's gentrification plan manifests itself in two policies: the Hope IV Rehabilitation Project and the"One Strike" Eviction statutes. The Hope IV Project is a Federally funded program which remodels, rebuilds and rehabilitates existing Federal public housing. During most of the project, the current tenants are relocated from their existing homes, without receiving an offer to move back into their old apartment. Remodeled and rehabilitated public government subsidized housing takes on a different character than the old housing. It has more middle class families.

The "one strike" eviction law allows the Federal Government to move out long term tenants, usually low income families, and replace them with moderate income families. Thus,the Federal Government is doing the same thing that gentrification does in urban areas. They are taking so-called distressed neighborhoods- in this case public housing projects- and are moving out the low-income families, remodeling them and replacing them with moderate income families.

A favorable ruling for the tenants in Rucker v. Davis will take away one tool from the Federal gentrification process, and help preserve affordable housing for low income tenants who are hurt the most in this nation wide housing crunch.

Tags

A Stern but Friendly nudge from don't know Joe about Voting.

09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
root
Original Body

by Joseph Bolden, staff writer,

2000 is as important a year as 2001. In November of 2000 its time to get out the vote. I didn’t see the MTV Awards on Thursday and I’m hear-ing the usual adult (Oh Damn, I’m One) blab on its coverage, inart-iculate guests, too much T ‘n A on stage. Give Me A Break, MTV was and is made to shock people and its done its job again splendidly remember it was cre-ated expressly for shocking grown folks and is a creative outlet for a younger generation - to angry, shocked, adults single or with children Get Over It as for Rap/Hip Hop Its Here and Won’t Go Away.

Deal With Reality. Rap and Hip Hop is INTERNATIONAL, GLOBAL, PROBABLY INTERGALACTIC SPEEDING THROUGH SPACE.

If you can’t stand the message or music don’t listen. Rap been disre-spected, ‘dissed, banned, and people have been arrested for selling it, the powers that be tried to overide market forces, that didn’t work either so now what? If rap still pisses people off because of messages they don’t want to hear then it too still does its job as informing, warning inner city folk and those that care enough to listen that we’re all are being are getting fucked over! If my phrasing is raw this is as bad as it gets - darn it.

MTV folks, your turn to voice your opinion, views, likes, dislikes, out-right hate too. Many adults believe you won’t go to the poll, do your civic duty. “Actually they don’t want you to vote so prove ‘em wrong show ‘em your generation and ones coming behind you that your ‘gen knows the game.”

We will leap forward or stumble backward. Me, I want more political parties like Life Extension Party, Immortalist Party, or L5-Spacer’s Party.
The L5 or Lagrange Point between earth and the moon and spacer is for people who are willing to go into space to live on asteroids, planitoids, or H.O.M.E.’s (High Orbital Mini Earths) yet another future political party.
How about independant asteroid mining for fun and profit.

Had a good laugh, well this could be our future if a couple of guys get elected and there are seats open for the Supreme Court.
Call all Grrrrls, Girls, Women, and Wimmin think of your choices. Doc-tor’s being maimed, killed because of the abortion debate, embryo, or stem cell research and medical benefits of cloning. (grow brainstem, nervous system separate from bodies) then you have parts that cannot be rejected and not another human being and no creepy moral dilema.

Think of homosexuals being beaten up, killed for sexual orientation alone. There is no Gay/Lesbian/Transexual/agenda, the only agenda is to stop killing for being slighly different from so called “normal heterosexual lifestyles. The Eternal made all of us without errors, the only Biological Errors are in Peoplekind none of us are perfect, genetically speaking hu-manity are full of flaws.

In Coeur D’Alene, Idaho a American Mother and child attacked and beaten in 1998 by Aryan Nations guards outside the white supremacist group’s North Idaho headquaters is awarded $6.3 million thusday. Richard Butler says “You can’t stop us, This is nothing.”
“We have planted seeds.” Butler’s chief of staff, Michael Teague said “This does not stop the message.” (Mr. B. the message is dying, its been heard too many times its old, ugly, filthy, untrue and twisted most people know you are wrong - GET OVER IT., IS THAT REASON ENOUGH TO VOTE!!

BYE.

Tags

Access Denied

09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
root
Original Body

"...Not Being Heard is standing inside of a beautiful bright blue sky with a shimmering sun that drips blood..."

by Tiny

Not Being Heard is standing inside of a beautiful bright blue sky with a shimmering sun that drips blood, and runs down the sidewalk and onto your feet as you stand next to humans that are laughing and talking and thinking about regular things like jobs and school work and friendships and family while you beg someone, anyone to help you out of this homeless shelter this jail this evistion court..this police car..this welfare line..this low wage job... this situation... this terror....dealing with struggles on top of struggles inside of other struggles tucked under rent checks and phone bills and towed cars and lost jobs that breed yet again more struggles - sufferring so deep and so endless that you canít breathe - - Not Being heard is to sit in jail next to five other inmates eating a wonder bread sand-wich as they wonder whatís wrong with.. them.... and gladly giving up because it is easier than going on...

Being heard is to dream that you will be listened to - perhaps understood... consulted..questioned and therefore recognized for the miracle of surviving through poverty..through hopelessness....surviving.... through not being heard.... Lisa Gray-Garcia

Thick gray fog descended on the POOR Magazine team of poverty journalists as we jumped off the 14 Mission towards Moscone center, the site of the National Association of Broadcasters. “Who gets access? “ Who Gets Heard” our brown, black, pale yellow and bright white hands clutched our handmade signs proclaiming our right to media access, the broadcast airwaves, and jus’being heard.

Our first encounter was a staged piece of street theatre in collaboration with Media alliance and “los Cybrids” a group of digital performance artists known for their radical art on race, class and gentrification.

“Hey Sweetheart, show me your breasts....yeah you, with the sign” Renee Garcia,played the role of Howard Sternum, as one of the representatives of “the National Association of Brainwashers”

The role of Eddie Fritz, CEO of The NAB was played by John Leanos repleat with bulging thighs and spontaneous regurgitation, Praba Pilar and Mario Zapp played the roles of corporate females who aided and abetted the evil white men in their mass media control along with a representative from Billionaires for Media Mergers.

And then.......Who gets Access ? Who gets Heard? suddenly the poor folks seized their rightful access and took down the “Corporate Fat Cats” landing them in a squirming pile on Howard street.

After we seized the mike, staff writers, Leroy Moore, Kaponda, Leo Stegman, Joseph Bolden, Anna Morrow, Barbara Huntley Smith, Liana Fabiani, Will Steel and myself began to speak truth to power,i.e., the handful of companies that control the airwaves.who arrived in limosines and Yahoo! taxicabs spitted out bunches of corporate media moguls as we the unheard and independent media, requested a voice; “What do we want?.... Access - When do we want it?...... now!!!”

The POOR Magazine staff was followed by Janine Jackson, program director of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting and Andrea Buffa, Executive Director of Media Alliance, who summed up the NAB’s tactics in an analagy to another far too powerful lobby group, “ The NAB is just like the NRA- but instead of lobbying for guns, they lobby to to keep the airwaves out of the hands of the public”

After our official press conference was finished the POOR staff embarked on their next form of “Media in Action”. We attached our press badges ( which stated that we were POOR Magazine reporters!), walked past the police barricades and into the polished floors of the Moscone Center North. “We are reporters-let’s report!!!” We murmured in unison

As we descended onto the the convention hall our first encounter with access denial was a whisper into a hand-held intercom by a security agent wearing a stiff blue polyester suit. “Five sketchy looking characters just entered the building...”

Undaunted we proceeded...through the shimmering chrome, glistening formica and floor to ceiling posters of PAUL HARVEY and DR LAURA. to the hall where Colin Powell would be speaking.

“You can’t come in without press credentials” A blue suited security man in conjunction with a tan suited woman were shaking their heads in a collaborative no!!

“But we have press credentials...” we all held up our badges.

“No....you need the press passes that we issue - you have to go downstairs for those”

“ OK” Once again we went down the escalator to another deeper escalator into the bowels of the Moscone center - we passed the signs and banners- lunch counter and slightly curious attendees and beyond a red velvet curtain into a long cement hall which would be our final destination.

“ What publication are you from?” Another tan suited security woman queried me on who we were as three other women and a Tommy Lee Jones/CIA-like NAB official huddled in the corner while shooting furtive glances in our direction. Meanwhile several reporters from NBC, MSNBC, CNN and ABC darted past us, picking up plastic badges hanging on sporty green necklaces. At one point the Tommy Lee Jones man walked in and out and when he returned he was followed by a San Francisco Police Officer, who unbeknownst to me was almost arresting one of our reporters who made the crucial mistake of taking a picture of the SFPD officer”

“We are from POOR Magazine....here are our press badges” I enunciated my words- savoring each consonant - intent on her hearing every syllable.

“But I don’t know that Mag-a-zine....” She shook her head as she spoke in much the same way all the people who have ever turned me down for an apartment, welfare payments, a job or a loan have done.

I was tempted to say - well you do nowwwww...but instead I continued, very seriously, very calmly, just like a game show host or a lawyer. “Well...we can go on-line right now and you can see our news service”

“OK” She relented quickly, guiding me swiftly to the back of the room to a small computer

After waiting for several painful minutes she printed a few pages of PNN and we walked to the front of the room. As she stood over the registration table shuffling through my forms the huddle formed once again, eventually motioning to my tan suited lady to come into the huddle. The huddle members all looked quite relieved, shaking their heads and chuckling, and as I inched nearer to them I heard them tell her, “Colin Powell has finished- give them passes......”

Tags

The 11th Floor

09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
root
Original Body

A narrative journey through homelessness

by Barbara Huntley-Smith

Suddenly, there was the sound of a key in the lock, the voice behind the door saying; “Sorry, we forgot that you were still here.” Those words jarred me back to reality. There I was in the lowest level of the court house complex, in a darkly lit room, with gray walls mimicking the plight of all its visitors; adorned with strategically located brown wooden benches. In this depressing setting, overwhelmed by the events of the day, I had fallen asleep, my eyes caked with tears.... unexplained tears. The voice was that of the Officer assigned to discharge those prisoners who have been sentenced in cases heard that day. In my case, the sentence was “Freed.” Slowly I arose from my hard wooden bench, and made my way outside.

The smell of wet earth from fresh fallen rain and gray skies, as gray as the walls which surrounded me all day, greeted my tired unkempt body as I made my way to the bus stop. At the bus stop I became aware that I had no money for the fare. An older woman also waiting for the bus, began an exchange with me. “Where are you going? she asked; “Evanston,” I remarked. “These buses are so slow in coming,” she continued. Then out of the corner of my eye, I observed a White Suburban van, its driver frantically waving toward us. I remarked to the woman, “I believe there is someone trying to get your attention! She said; “O! that is my goddaughter, she is going into Evanston, she will take us both there. We boarded the van and during that ride,I reflected on the events that brought me to this place.

It was an unusually warm Autumn Sunday afternoon, I remembered standing at the oversized window on the Eleventh floor of the Holiday Inn Hotel, gazing out at the dramatic splendor of vivid colors of yellow, orange, red, and dazzling shades of blues, as the sun brilliantly took its position in the morning sky. .

Eleven days ago I was homeless in a new town, unsure of my purpose, but was able to obtain sleeping accommodations at it’s only homeless shelter. Feeling secure, I would now seek to engage myself in my routine when in a new area. Returning to the shelter that evening, I was informed that there had been an error, I could not remain there any longer, not even

for that night. Bewildered, I stood with my bags as if seeking divine intervention.

Standing there, I noticed a black compact car. Its blackness seem to speak to my dilemma. I began a one-sided monologue with this car. “Who is your owner?” “Are you going to be taking me home with you?” In the heat of my monologue, a man and woman walked toward the car, then abruptly stopped, and inquired of me; “Were you put out?” “Yes” I replied, “Do You have a place to stay?” they chimed in unison, “No!” I responded. They huddled together, then turned to me and said, “My Cousin lives upstairs, she is the caretaker of the property, she may be able to give you a place to stay tonight.

Entering the dimly lit living-room where the family was gathered, my eyes downcast like a child lost in a store, I said, “hello my name is Barbara.” Immediately a woman gasped, “my Lord she is Jamaican,” to which I concurred. “What has happened to you my dear?” That statement is so cultural, that had it not been for the fact that I truly needed a place for my bags, I would have left right then. It was for good for me that I remained silent and allowed the moment to pass, because her next words were, “my dear whatever it is that has brought you to us I will try my best to help you,” in the same breath she asked, “are you hungry?” “Yes” I replied, in minutes I was feasting on a delicious sandwich with some refreshing fruit juices.

After the meal, she reminded me that she could only provide a night’s stay as she was accountable to the Proprietors. While the conversation was in progress I noticed that there were five young men in the room, my first thought was they were visitors, but would soon understand why my host was so adamant on my staying one night, these young men were her sons. My two rescuers now gone, but before leaving had offered me advice, and dollars for the next day’s meal. As bedtime approached, I was taken across a small hallway to a door which after it was opened, revealed my true resting place for the night.

The room was dark, the only light was the reflection from the street light which streamed through it’s only window. In the middle of the floor were several paint containers large and small, recognizable by the odor which greeted me. A ladder extended to the ceiling formed the central decor of my abode. Emersed in thought of my new accommodation, as if to interrupt my thoughts, my host said apologetically, “this is all I can offer you tonight,” as she handed me a blanket, sheet and a pillow. Sleep came quickly. The instructions I received at bedtime, was the motivation for my being up at the sound of dawn. “I should be the first to use the bathroom,

have things properly stored in the room, then I could enter the kitchen where my host would be.” It was our moment to discuss this cultural perception. It is perceived among some Jamaicans,that being in the United States with all the privileges available, it would be a disgrace to be homeless. The implications were, “my situation was all my fault.”

After explaining my purpose as I saw it then, she relented and with a wave of her hand intimated that she understood. She made me lunch, reminded me that my bags can only be stored there for a day and I left. It was a half a mile or less to the Lake, the sun was not yet up on this cool crisp Fall morning, so I began walking in that direction. Arriving at the Lake, the sun was just splitting the horizon where the expanse of the Lake and the sky seem to become one. I found a large rock and sat there drinking in this perfection of gold, and blue, as the first hot rays of the rising sun hit my face; my eyes seem unworthy of beholding such radiance. Hours passed, the sun now high in the sky as students began passing by, on their way to the university, all having a planned day but me. Having pondered my morning, I began walking to the center of town and was startled when I saw the numbers of my former home address 1717 above a Church.

It was Wednesday, therefore I thought this was a direct invitation to attend that church. Having had many unexplained situations happened on my journey this was rather a tame conjecture. At six o clock, I was present at the church. As the meeting progressed I scanned the audience looking for that person who would be my guide to the next stage of this odessy, there was nothing. Leaving the church my thoughts were mixed. I was quite sure that something would happen in my favor. Walking, and thinking that I had made the promise to my now former host to come and retrieve my bags, now what am I going to do.

As these thoughts were being turned over in my mind, a big white Caddillac stopped at my side. Looking at this car the passenger’s window began to roll down, and the driver franticly motioning me to come closer. The driver was an older Black Woman. Leaning toward the passenger side she asked: “Can I give you a lift somewhere?” I cannot remember a time when I gave my life situation in two minutes flat. Then there was a click, as she motion me into the car saying, “honey you need to be in the Holiday Inn tonight.” I gave her directions to the house where my bags were being kept, and we were off.

The Caddillac came to a stop at the very spot I had that one-way monologue with that other black car. alighting from the car I raced up the

flight of stairs leading to the front door of my former host. The door opened and she greeted me with concern, but I was able to put her fears to rest pointing to the woman waiting to take me to the Holiday Inn. The Young men took my bags and escorted me to the waiting car. My bags safely inside the trunk of the car, we drove around the next block to the Holiday Inn. The Bellhop and my Good Samaritan took my bags into the hotel and deposited them at my feet, as the woman went to the registration desk. The Bellhop got his instructions and was off, while I was given specific instructions by my Good Samaritan. “Do not leave until I come to get you, I want to hear more of this amazing life you’ve been experiencing,” and then she was off.

Morning came and I waited for the call telling me she was on her way, but the call which came was from the desk, informing me to come and have my computerized door key updated. I was surprised, but thought she was truly a God-send, and wanted to help me another day. This situation continued for eleven days.

It is now Sunday the eleventh day of my stay on the eleventh floor in room eleven -o- one. It’s six o clock in the evening, oddly enough I was not called to update my key that day at the appropriate time, which I had thought was an oversight, when the call came. On the elevator ride down I felt in every fiber of my being that I was in for something but not in my grandest imagination could I have seen myself being interrogated by two of the city’s detectives. Of course true to her word “do not leave until I come again,” my Good Samaritan was present. I was taken to the Police Station and charged with “defrauding the Inn-keeper”

The following morning a rainy dark day, with peals of thunder which seem to burst through the thick darkness of the sky; as flashes of fierce, frightening lightening greeted me. Semi-handcuffed, two Police Officers tried to ease my fears, as I was driven to my court hearing.

Tags

Access Denied Equals Anger

09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
root
Original Body

by Leroy Moore

Audre Lorde once wrote that anger is full of energy and knowledge and if we don’t listen and speak this anger it’ll eat us alive. On September 21, 2000 small and independent media spoke their anger at the National Association of Broadcasters convention outside the Moscone Center of San Francisco. The question is, did NAB inside listen to the anger of the protesters outside the convention?

As a revolutionary poet and founder of Disability Advocates of Minorities Advocates (DAMO) I’ve had many experiences with being censored at cultural events, being blacklisted at mainstream radio stations and being called "too radical" by many local newspapers, liberal and conservative. So when I found out about the NAB protest I jumped at it- but with my eyes wide open.

Just like the Democratic and Republican conventions, the NAB convention had two sides. One side was what happened inside of the Moscone Center, while the other side was what was going on outside. I and my POOR News co-workers had the opportunity to check out both sides of the NAB convention. Approaching the protest outside I felt at home. There was a rainbow of people holding up powerful signs of their dislike of NAB and the lack of access to the media for poor, people of color and other minorities.

Tags

Little Person Speaks

09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
root
Original Body

by Anna Morrow

Red heads have a reputation for being hot heads-outspoken and opinionated. I’m constantly aware of the way my, very visual, reputation proceeds me. I’m always wanting to disprove this myth, but much to my chagrin it’s true.

When I learned that we would be staging a protest at the NAB conference 2000 I had a surge of anxiety, uncharacteristic of my red headed temperament. Here was my chance to speak out against the corporate greed that systematically squelches my existence at every turn. One would think I’d be foaming at the mouth ready to tell those fat cats just how I feel. On the contrary I had suddenly become shy and withdrawn and desperate to avoid my turn at the mic. The whole thing just seemed too important to be putting together at the eleventh hour which is the typical pace of news media. Was it the hasty preparation or something a little deeper causing my hesitation?

Being poor has its ups and downs. The fascinating thing is that many people who have money and power often misjudge the hardships of poverty and overlook the greatness. I often enjoyed being a catalyst for identifying hypocrisy in an unsuspecting adversary. And sometimes I am so much the underdog that I actually feel as little and insignificant as corporate suit and tie money tycoons might consider me. I am somewhat of a chameleon. You would not necessarily know that I’m homeless and living well below the poverty line unless I told you. This dynamic of big and little pretty much sums of the entire event in my eyes.

The protest itself was much less pressure than I had anticipated. It was comic relief for this decidedly unfunny event. A comedic demonstration was staged for the all important eye of the media . Ironically we were all looking to make our point into the microphone or the eye of the camera hoping that the corporate news channels would record our protests and grant us access over their air waves. The very reason we were there. What do we want? Access ! When do we want it ? Now!

Cars were flying by on the one way street in front of the Moscone Center. Every once in a while an enthusiastic supporter would honk on the way by. Poor magazine was there en masse holding signs and yelling Boooooooo or yeaaaaaaaaaa in response to the comedians portraying the bad guys – NAB and allies. The sound system failed to provide sound about half way through, so in the spirit of the original protests, we turned to the use of bullhorns. The skit about big corporate mergers and little independent radio went well but I couldn’t help feeling like the whole thing was a bit too benign. We amounted to only a handful of angry voices compared to the busload after busload of NABies arriving to fill up Moscone Center. The end of the rally was just the beginning. I was about to find out just how little I really am.

We decided to go into the conference hall as a group, using our press passes to gain entry. We were joined by a Civil Rights attorney and advocate Martha Bridegam…just in case.(I would later be very grateful that she had volunteered to escort us.) Inside we were immediately swallowed up by the enormity of the Moscone Center. A humongous hollow converted to appeal to the members and groupies of the NAB. There were advertising banners hanging that must have been as big as our entire group of protesters – and there were hundreds of them! We took the escalator down one floor to the exhibit hall level in search of the registration office for official press badges. The event reminded me of traveling to seminars for corporate America. Suddenly I wanted to take off and grab some food and rent a car.

My friend Leroy waited for me while I bought a banana and some water. It took me awhile at the cashier because I had to search my bag for an additional two dollars. The total of the purchase was $3.95. What a rip off. But I was hungry. By the time Leroy and I made it to the first security guard check point she was expecting us. The others had told them we were coming and asked her to point us in the right direction. How nice, I thought, to be greeted personally and given directions. What I did not know was that this same nice woman had radioed ahead to the registration people alerting them that “ some sketchy people” were heading in their direction.

We must have walked about a quarter of a mile past the security guard to get to the registration desk. Down a long corridor filled with behind the scenes props – hand trucks trucks, dolleys loaded with rolled up carpets, and towers of cardboard boxes- we finally arrive at the make shift registration room. This is where the real fun began.

We met up with our cohorts and they told us about the whispering and pointing and radioing that had taken place. We were apparently not welcome and the official corporate communications managers were trying to figure out some way to deny us access and decline our registrations. Unfortunately for them we had all the necessary documentation and so even though they were “not familiar with POOR magazine”, we showed them the web site and there was not much they could do but grant us our passes. While were waiting in line I’m asked to take some picture and so I do. I whip out the ole throw away camera and get busy. Shots of the never ending backstage corridor, the registration booth, the important news bulletin board, the flyer on the wall, the SFPD who has arrived in response to the huddle taking place regarding us. That last picture might have been a mistake. At the very least it changed the entirety of my trip to the conference.

Mr. SFPD apparently was not too happy about having his picture taken because next thing I know he is inches from my face pointing at my nose saying “don’t ever take my picture again” followed up by about 10 minutes of intimidation and scolding telling me there is a rule written in the southern station that says it not ok to take pictures of police officers. When I say I have never heard of this and ask for more information this just makes him madder. "Why are you taking my picture?” he demands “because I’m taking picture of the event and you’re part of it” I say. To which he counters “I am NOT a part of this event”

We are clearly having a difference of opinion . I am feeling a little afraid as he is talking into his shoulder radio requesting back up. Then he says “lets take this outside”. Unfortunately at this point my intrinsic nature as a red head has been ignited and the last thing I want to do is back down or show fear. Thankfully the news director from KZYZ, (public broadcasting in Mendocino County) who has been standing in line, shoulders up to me and says to the officer “I've taken lots of picture of cops and not once have I been told not to. I just got back from LA and took 100’s of pictures!”. I’m very grateful that she has appeared to take up part of this conversation because my voice is beginning to betray me and is sounding a little shaky. Together we agree to step out side with officer Simmons. As we move towards the fake door Benny reminds me that Martha is here just for these types of situations. He motions her over and I've never been happier to see anyone. Martha immediately take charge - all calm, cool and collected (a posture I’ve been loosing hold of since the beginning of our exchange). “What’s happening here” she says clearly into the pocket recorder and then moves it towards the mouth of officer 1460.

Eventually nothing happens. Martha is able to articulate that there has obviously been a misunderstanding. Mr. policeman is backing down now saying he never said I couldn’t take his picture that all he said was that it is common courtesy to ask permission first. That’s not how I remember it. But my memory is pretty fuzzy by now; I wouldn’t put money down on my objective account of the events. What I remember mostly is the feeling of fear. Of being intimidated by an authority figure for some reason I could not comprehend that was clearly beyond just me and my camera. Why was he so vehemently opposed to having his picture taken that he needed to threaten me with some (fictitious) rule that I and fellow reporters had never heard of? And why was it necessary for him to use the power of his uniform, badge and shoulder radio to belittle me so fiercely and publicly? Was it a personal thing or just some macho way of sticking up for the corporate fat cats in opposition to the opposition – us.

Either way it was a weird exchange and I was happy to take my press badge and get the heck out of there. I actually considered the consequence of being hauled of to jail as I stood defiantly unwilling to buckle under pressure when I knew I had done nothing wrong. Thankfully I did not get myself into too much trouble.

I left skipping down the hall (or was I floating?) holding my press badge- my reward- up to the security guard and slipped into the exhibit. I was completely ready to blend into the sea of faces and high tech products and sales pitches. I was overtaken by a strange mixture of needing to be treated with respect and a long undernourished shopping addiction. The exhibit hall was the perfect solution to both.

I used that official press badge to flirt with all the vendors who were wanting to sell me their services or machinery. My need for retail therapy was satisfied exquisitely by all the free candy, pens and prizes. I was enjoying a momentary slice of bliss. On my way through I had a small conversation which was worth all the discomfort it had taken to get there: at one of the dot com booth I was leaning over to check out their CD’s when the suit and tie sales rep tilts his head to the side studying my pass and inquires:

“Which press?”

“Poor Magazine “

“Poor? What do they do?”

“We provide media access for low and no income folks.”

“Who buys that ?”

“No one.” I say

“You mean it’s free?”

“Yeah.”

“Really.”

“Really.” I turn away, smiling to myself- another tiny bit of hypocracy – exposed to the perpatrator.

I take my bag of free stuff, grab a cup of free coffee and head for the promenade. The escalator chugs back up to the surface slowly as I glance over at the white middle aged men heading down. I study them wondering who they might be, who they might think I am. I wonder if they see my press pass and mistakenly think I’m one of them. They smile and stare so I assume that I’ve passed some unspoken, intangible test; slipped in under the radar. For the most part, no one here knows that I am homeless and beyond broke.

Tags

A Short Breath

09/24/2021 - 11:44 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
root
Original Body

SF District Attorney takes on The Evil landlords

by Leticia Velasquez and Lisa gray-Garcia

Leticia is a former resident of San Francisco where she was evicted after living in the Mission for 32 years by an owner move-in. She is a member of POOR Magazine's writer facilition project which seeks to translate the voices of low and no income adults and youth. Lisa Gray-Garcia is Leticia's writier facilitator and co-editor of www.poornewsnetwork.com and POOR Magazine

It is seldom that we as low income, gentrified, evicted and displaced folk have a reason to celebrate, when we win some small fight for justice because a city official in power does the right thing, so when it happens we must take a breath, stand up and notice that our rights have been upheld, our voices have been heard and pleas have been recognized. Just such a day has occurred in the Bay Area and that city official is District Attorney Terrence Hallinan

Consider the case of the Evanchek family - Mr and Mrs. Evanchek were tenants of one of two units on Arleta Ave in San Francisco for over twenty years. Mrs. Evanchek is disabled and receives Kidney Dialysis three times a week. In 1996 the smaller unit in the back became vacant and The Evancheks 23 year old daughter signed a lease and she and her baby moved into the smaller unit

Under the San Francisco Rent ordinance the landlord of a multiple unit dwelling such as the arleta Ave property can recover one of the units for the landlords own use. Moreover the landlord of a multiple unit dwelling cannot evict a disabled tenant who has resided in the unit for more than ten years

So when the new owners bought the property in 1999 the rent ordinance would have permitted them to do an owner move in eviction of one of the two units, not both, and since Mrs. Evanchek was disabled she was protected, in the larger unit, from an owner move-in eviction

But the new owners wanted both units. After first filing two separate notices to vacate they then claimed the property was a single family home with a guest cottage. This is because the rent control ordinance permits an owner move-in eviction of a single family home even if there is a disabled tenant.

The landlord's attorney began referring to the 2nd smaller unit as a "shed" and served a new single eviction notice seeking not only to evict the entire family but requiring them to pay attorney's fees as well. The Evancheks could not afford an attorney. Faced with the fear of being evicted and having to pay attorneys fees they accepted, in the hallway, outside the courtroom, an offer of three months free rent and moved out.

Although the Evancheks accepted the 90 days and a mule offer, they did not release their liability under the Rent ordinance. Since then they received legal representation from Andrew Westley who served a wrongful eviction lawsuit on the new owner's

As well, District Attorney, Terrence Hallinan has filed criminal charges for this illegal eviction; His statement to this reporter was "In Charging this as a misdemeanor illegal eviction the District Attorney is seeking to enforce the rent ordinance passed by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors to protect the rights of tenants

For every tenant who has felt the terror of an eviction with no recourse, who has taken the quick deals in the hallway with a pit in their stomach and a lump in their throat, who has lost their belongings, neighborhoods and familiarity due to an illegal eviction…. I thank Mr. Weatley, Mr. Hallinan and the SF board of Supervisors, and for the Evancheks -take a short breath, I know I will.

Tags