Story Archives 2010

Silenced Mamas Speak back to Commissioner Slabach!

09/24/2021 - 09:21 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
PNNscholar1
Original Body

San Francisco Family Law Commissioner Marjorie A. Slabach was featured as a "queen" alongside of other California county judges in "Familawt" years ago. Picture featured on the Rogues Gallery at http://home.earthlink.net/~elnunes/camelot.htm Silenced Mamas Speak back to Commissioner Slabach!

 

 

 

“Dear Janice Mirikitani, I heard you are going to be the keynote speaker to honor Marjorie Slabach. Miss Slabach is responsible for hundreds of damaging rulings, hurting families and children, particularly women, and especially poor women.”

Opening letter address from Dominique Bremond to Janice Mirikitani, president of the Glide Foundation. It was concerning her outrage of an upcoming event honoring San Francisco Family Law Commissioner, Marjorie A. Slabach. She is one of many “Silenced Mamas” impacted by Slabach’s biased and unjust rulings.

A series of shock waves hit my comrades of POOR Magazine/PNN, just recently. Searching the internet google site, three weeks ago, I discovered an upcoming event that would be honoring a certain presiding judicial officer: San Francisco Family Law Commissioner, Marjorie A. Slabach! What was even more outrageous was the title of the event: “Through the Eyes of Children.”

This is a hard slap to the face of all “Silenced Mamas” who were (and still are) victims of Marjorie A. Slabach in family custody and other cases within her courtroom. Since December 11th, 2007, POOR has painstakingly kept track of some of Slabach’s activities consisting of unethical judicial misconduct. We’ve done this through media, and action. Re-porting her injustices within the courtroom, and sup-porting her victims.

The “Silenced Mamas” movement continues to increase with every single biased ruling rendered by Slabach. Her "rulings" coupled with a misogynist-like attitude are often against female litigants in custody and other cases.

Following a blatant miscarriage of justice, in which myself, and “Tiny” Lisa Gray-Garcia witnessed her unlawfully take the child away from a single mom, Sandra Thomsen, the “Revolutionary Legal Advocacy Project” was born that same day. Myself, and Tiny felt this was critical need to formulate this project in order to penetrate the lies within an unjust legal system that deliberately targets people in poverty.

Single moms, or we’ve at POOR call “Silenced Mamas” every time their rights are robbed at the San Francisco Superior Courthouse, on 400 McAllister St Dept# 404. (Where Slabach often hears cases, and literally silences the voices of mamas.) “How could Marjorie Slabach do this to our family? She gave my dad a five year restraining order against my mum.”

Explains an anonymous petitioner in their comments on the online petition, “Action to Unseat Judge Marjorie A. Slabach” following their own experience with Slabach. (I created this petition in an effort to hopefully have her removed from this bench, someday.) “He was the violent one, how can this happen in family court? Kids recover best from divorce when their parents communicate? This is terrible! How could a judge do this to us?”

“Action to Unseat Judge Marjorie A. Slabach.” Link to petition: http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/mothersagainstslabach/?e Arrival to her courtroom upon departing the elevator, an art portrait of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. is posted on the wall. This is quite hypocritical considering the overwhelming masses of injustices stemming form this courthouse, and not just from Slabach, herself.

A fetish form of blatant blasphemy of a leader who dedicated and sacrificed his very life for the civil rights of all, particularly the poor. Straight ahead is another art portrait of Cesar Chavez. Walking past the whispering between the litigants and their attorneys, I often feel the process of elimination preparations. Attorneys alleging adequate representation to their clients. Inside her courtroom, the aura in the atmosphere is a silent stench of hidden evils.

Psychological evaluation recommendations for the “best interests of the child”, which are typically tainted and even false in supervised visitation reports submitted for Slabach’s review. Outside her courtroom, an expected fair and just hearing often becomes the opposite to the unsuspecting. “Her rulings are totally irrational, spur of the moment.” Says Dominique Bremond.

Bremond went into further detail regarding Slabach in a recent online interview with me: “For example, we, my ex and I, had a mediation scheduled with Slabach, in her office, in order to see if we could avoid a trial and find a compromise. Slabach had a bad cold that day, so she decided to see us in the courtroom instead of her office, which was fine. She kept sneezing and blowing her nose, she was obviously uncomfortable.

After a few minutes, she became angry over what I said which was "the situation we have is working, I see no reason to upset my son's schedule. She (Slabach) yelled at me, sneezed and mumbled something. Then, my ex made a comment, I don't remember what, but nothing outrageous. Suddenly, Slabach through a fit, as she was sneezing and coughing, saying: "That's it, this is going to trial!" She immediately called the clerk to schedule a date for a trial with Judge (Donna) Hitchens, insisting, we HAD to have Judge Hitchens.”

What Dominique Bremond received in the end from Slabach was a waste of her time, and a great deal of expense. “So the mediation, in fact, never actually took place. Instead we had another Slabach tantrum. I had seen some of her tantrum as I was waiting for my turn in her courtroom. The trial cost me $$$$$. The evaluator lied in her report, lied on the stand under oath. She charged the top end of this type of evaluation, over $12,000. Hitchens couldn't care less, but that's another story.”

We’re not just members of the bar Here in Familawt, Familawt We’re connoisseurs of the bizarre! Best interests of the children is our watchword We frown upon disparagement and blame In short there is simply not, a more congenial spot For ending your relationship than here in Fam-i-lawt Familawt. Familawt!!

(Caricature performance of "Camelot" featuring numerous judges, including Slabach from various counties, participating in their mocking to the very law that they preside over, titled “Familawt.” http://home.earthlink.net/~elnunes/camelot.htm Below are details of the upcoming event "Through the Eyes of Children" presented by The Family Law Section of the Bar Association of San Francisco and Rally Visitation Services of Saint Francisco Memorial Hospital:

Where: Pierrotti Pavillion Saint Francis Memorial Hospital 900 Hyde Street San Francisco, CA 94109

When: October 7th, 2010. Time: 5:30 p.m.-7:30 p.m. Keynote Speaker: Janise Mirkitani, President, Glide Foundation Honoring: Dr. Patricia Galamba and Commissioner, Marjorie A. Slabach Lifetime Achievement Award presented to: Judge Donna Hitchens In a continued effort in re-porting and supporting the "Silenced Mamas" movement, POOR Magazine/PNN will be at this event to protest the honoring of Marjorie Slabach.

We urge all moms or anyone deeply impacted by Slabach's biased rulings to please join us in our opposition against this outrage.

“An injustice anywhere is an injustice everywhere!” Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

Tags

A Mural of Resistance

09/24/2021 - 09:21 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
cayley
Original Body

A ReVieWfoRtHErEVoLution  on POOR Magazine's new mural in San Francisco.

I took the bus down to the once down-parts, the they-used-to-be low-down parts; the dog town, formerly dirty down, formerly affordable rent parts of Mission. I climbed over the SROs, which have been almost pulverized beneath the tide of condo-lofts, lofty-condos, condo-TICs, ricky-ticky lofty boxes. I squeezed past the mocha-latte sucking poetry mafia in their faux-thriftstore chairs, in the wasteland of the Valencia cafes. I passed all the places that I used to know and was beginning to not know anymore, searched until I found POOR's powerful new mural filled with images and text of resistance, struggle and revolution on Clarion Alley. The first thing that returned to memory as I beheld it was my experience at the California State Summer School for the Arts (CSSSA). I was part of the writer's program; it was the only formal art training I had ever received. I can still vividly remember the way the writers were treated amid the other "real artists" of the school.

Dance was big, with the whip thin, tight-bodied ballerinas and big-bootied, dreadlocked afro-cuban students strutting around like they owned the place. And if any class of artist ruled there it was the visual artists, by sheer numbers, but also because when people thought "artist" what came to mind was always a pencil mustachioed painter with a flat frenchy hat, or a beatnik with a sketchbook, or some other flavor of visual art maker.

The writers were like poor relations; when people asked me why I was there and I said, "I'm a writer," blankness invariably settled over faces like steely curtains. The kinder ones furrowed their brows and exclaimed, "Oh! Is there a writing workshop here?" The less kind replied, "Huh. Writing isn't art, though, so why are you at an art school?"

CSSSA was also the place where I found counterculture. Talent and style were represented abundantly and at the time I was utterly taken with the newness of the scene in which I found myself, the ART scene. There were hippie kids, rastas, punks, gothics, metalheads, skaters, skins, surfers, emos, and even some hip-hoppers. At the time I thought it was the height of diversity, regardless of the fact that whatever the sub cultural flavor, the majority of the kids were white.

When I came home, it wasn't long before I threw away my Swatch watch and started constructing what I thought of as my personal statement out of found, bought and cast-off clothes and made jewelry. I still think of CSSSA with great nostalgia because it was the place where I first began to question the mainstream values instilled in me as a child. Needless to say, that questioning began the way it does for so many disaffected white suburban kids (although I was neither white nor suburban)...it began with aesthetics.

Luckily I never internalized the idea that writers aren't artists. I grew up writing, and now that I write with POOR I get to combine my art, my writing and my tremendous dissatisfaction with the way things are in this society in which we live. I have interviewed the D.A; I have done articles slamming the SF Department of Human Services, hellthcare, and SROs. I am comfortable with my writing life, and I am accustomed to, if not accepting of, being enraged by the way social injustice plays out in the mainstream and in the media.

I have shed my black eyeliner and goth velvet for jump drives and a laptop. But this is not to say that I do not occasionally miss the satisfaction of crafting a "look" and being completely certain that it stands as my manifesto. I could never go back to that brand of shallowness, but I couldn't help remembering the relative simplicity of it as I thought about the POOR Magazine mural project in Clarion Alley.

Clarion Alley is famous in the semi-obscure way local art projects can become when they get tied to activism in just the right way. The Clarion Alley Mural Project seems to have begun as a way for native, indigenous, and default-gentrifier artists who lived in the Mission in the late 20th century to simultaneously mourn, mark and resist the homogenizing effects of the full-scale gentrification that kicked into play in the Mission at that time.

Until the subject of the mural came up at POOR, I had no idea that the alley was famous for anything but the cool parties that "organizers" have been throwing since 2002. I have always assumed that an anti-gentrification stance is by definition pro-neighborhood if you're talking about neighborhoods being gentrified, but the first Clarion Alley party I ever attended looked nothing like the neighborhood that hosted it.

I remember walking alone into a bunch of mostly white hipster kids. I remember hanging at the party for two hours, drinking exactly 4 beers, and never being spoken to or approached, barely even looked at by anyone. Hardly the Mission I knew outside of the alley. Everyone seemed so...cliquish.

It was neo-hipster artsy default gentrifiers at their finest; everyone dressed in such very similar ways that it had me wondering if we were violating any gang-injunction regulations by gathering...Old sneakers, boots, tattoos and thrift store finery; it was art-school lite all over again.

I felt at that party just as Tiny, our executive director and poverty scholar in residence at POOR, and her mama Dee felt for years living as poor artists in the Bay Area.

"As poor artists who attempted to gain access to 'the art scene' in San Francisco but who could not afford to pay tuition at SF State, let alone at one of the private art schools here in the Bay Area, my mom and I always felt like outsiders on Clarion Alley," said Tiny. However, she sees the POOR Magazine mural as penetrating the privilege divide that was only made possible by the access of local artist, Caitlin Seana.

"It was interesting to have Caitlin, the artist who got us into the alley and who in many ways represents the often-exclusive art world, show so much empathy and understanding about why it was not only important, but crucial, to have POOR in the alley, a space that, though hyped mostly by children of middle class privilege, still positions itself as at the heart of resistance to the gentrification of a traditionally working class/poor neighborhood...and because she, as a member of that privileged art school world, is the conduit, the mural would not have happened without her," said Tiny.

Mural space on Clarion is extremely hard to come by, due to the popularity of the venue; Caitlin was given space because she helps organize the mural-painting part of the Clarion Alley event.

"I wanted to make [my mural space] something bigger than just a personal statement," said Caitlin, who describes her murals as message boards and not just beautification. "I wanted to bring POOR Magazine to the wall to show people that there are roots in this city of dope people doing amazing things to affect change in original ways…offering a mural was my way of supporting POOR and honoring the work that you all do," said Caitlin.

A slender, beautiful twenty-five year old who majored in conceptual art at SF State and graduated in 2001, Caitlin is privileged in that she has had an encouraging, loving family and access to a better than average education and a reasonable amount of material stability. She is aware of how POOR has been heavily influenced by both "high" and "popular" art theory and practice through co-founders Tiny and Dee, who began their revolutionary art careers staging performance pieces after auditing art classes at State because they could not afford tuition.

"I'd been hearing dee and tiny speak on the radio throughout the past few years and I always appreciated their style of journalism and their relevance to issues San Francisco citizens face. I like the way that they would be serious and upbeat, expressing complex ideas in a straightforward manner, and maintaining a certain sense of artistry throughout it all. I admire the theatre and outreach work that they do," said Caitlin.

The entirety of Clarion is located between Mission and Valencia, with 17th and 18th streets running parallel on either side. If one looks to the west while standing on the alley, one can see the Mission precinct cop shop squatting like a smooth, watchful concrete and tile gargoyle on the other side of Valencia. Our mural site rests in the body of the Community Thrift building, one of the district's most venerable old nonprofit thrift stores.

Oddly enough, directly facing the mural is a wonderful example of the kind of pseudo-"loft" condominium development that has spread like a bauhaus cancer throughout the Mission since the late 1990's, displacing thousands of working class and poor individuals and families from their homes, and even lower middle class default – colonizer artsy white kids, as they are built.

This placement is addressed in the mural, of course; in the middle left side there are dirty yellow bulldozers demolishing houses with magically real, frightened looking faces. One of these houses is occupied by a family; rather than having a face, two small figures, obviously children, stand in the arms of a longhaired silhouette on the upper floor, and another figure stands at the window on the ground floor. The word "eviction" is drawn in block letters across the front door. The grim action of the bulldozers takes place in the shadow of ticky-tacky high-rise boxes that have the exact same degenerate-Santa Fe color-scheme of the life-size condo-box "loft" development that glowers at the mural from across the alley. On the bottom-left is a developer in a dirt-colored suit holding a deed that says "condos for money."

The figures that dominate the mural are two of POOR's key mythic heroic characters, Superbabymama and El Mosquito. Superbabymama is our saint of the spoken truth; with her mic in hand she guards the way to the right. El Mosquito is our vengeful angel, wings thrown back in a ready posture; his left hand crushes a Lennar truck as it wreaks havoc on the wrecking ball and the bulldozers that are poised to take out the cluster of frightened houses, and his right hand holds a skull as it beckons to the observer. In keeping with POOR's practice of honoring the everyday poverty hero/heroine, these two ferocious sentinels are gatekeepers to the road that takes la gente out of the hells of oppressive anti- poverty laws, cruel urban profiteering and murderous gentrification.

The road is depicted in a vibrant orange, lined with people because POOR believes that it is the people, our community, that will ultimately give us the strength and support to free ourselves. The orange road cuts straight through the center of the mural, sewn with words and leading the eye out of the chaos of words and struggle imagery into cool green hills and sky-blue sky that seems to bleed off the high side of the building and into the actual air of the day.

On the top left side of the road is "the house that POOR built," a rainbow-hued compound of strong, warehouse-type buildings that represent all the programs and projects that POOR offers. On the top right is a San Francisco cityscape. On either side of the orange road, where it tapers off into the dream hills, there are crowds of people welcoming travelers coming to them off of the way. And above it all, the twin banners of POOR Magazine and Homefulness seem to ripple and shelter the magical scenes under blood-red wings.

Our mural is not neat or pretty or polished. Our images are not idealized; they are obviously a reflection of our ongoing struggles with The Way Things Are as far as human rights like housing being sacrificed to a wider margin of profit, in San Francisco and everywhere. Other murals on Clarion use text, but our text is crawling, swarming, kinetic, like a barrage of ideas that may not be comfortable but are ignored at the peril of the thinking person.

Addressing poverty, racism, disability and gentrification through art and writing is something we've always done at POOR as a form of education and resistance. Our mural continues this tradition as it was created by the community members that are themselves dealing with gentrification, eviction and displacement, which in and of itself is an act of resistance.

Caitlin herself feels art and activism can change the course of action, as she says, "Gentrification can be resisted with radical art and organized movements, whether we do punk parades, outdoor teach-ins or benefits to pay for eviction trials."

In my opinion, radical art is only as radical as the message that gets through, and for me, attending that summer art program and willfully taking control of my personal aesthetic was my first step toward a rebellion, a dissatisfaction, which would eventually help shape my entire outlook, including my political stance.

But effective activism cannot be rooted in, say, colored hair and ripped clothes alone; a picture is seldom worth a thousand words, and a benefit to pay for an eviction trial must not stop at just one show, one reading, or one art sale to stop the only the warehouse-gallery where all the artkids go to look at each others' latest from being converted into a TIC.

In a 2002 SF Bay Guardian article, Glen Hefland generated a new term to describe the mostly art school trained, mostly privileged white-dominated art scene of the Mission: he called it, "the Mission school." To me this "school" represents colonization and thievery of land and housing.

The POOR Magazine mural is at once, a piece of multi-layered public art that resides in the eye of the needle of the undeclared war of gentrification on poor people and peoples of color in the mission and as well, lives in a place that we kicked out poor folks can't. And, by its residence there, it is not a cutesy, palatable, snack of culture and real-ness, like a tour to the Natural History Museum or the zoo, but rather, a powerful form of resistance and an offensive attack on the rampant gentrification and displacement of that neighborhood through a very public form of art.


 

Tags

Dine' Water Rights Resistance

09/24/2021 - 09:21 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
mari
Original Body

Navajo Nation Council Tables Water Rights Settlement
Grassroots Dine’ (Navajo) Vow to Stand Against Oppression
 
WINDOW ROCK, AZ – Due to pressure from the community, the Navajo Nation Council decided to put off voting on the Northeastern Arizona Indian Water Rights Settlement Agreement (NAIWRSA) and gave one week for public review but did not specify what the review would look like. The Council is set to consider the legislation again on Friday, October 8th but the date is subject to change.
 
Legislation No. 0422-10, also known as NAIWRSA, sponsored by Council Delegate George Arthur has faced increasing community criticism in the last few weeks.
 
More than 160 concerned Dine’ (Navajo) marched, rallied and then packed the council chambers to send the message for the council to “VOTE NO!” on the water rights settlement. Children, elders, parents, students and others from throughout the Navajo Nation joined together in chanting, “Water is life! Save our Future!”
 
NAIWRSA was created by lawyers including a non-native, Stanley Pollack, with the Navajo Nation as an attempt to resolve water rights claims of the Navajo Nation and Hopi Tribe for water from the Little Colorado River and from the lower Colorado River.
 
Dine’ community members have raised concerns that NAIWRSA gives the Navajo Nation only 31,000 acre-feet per year of 4th Priority Colorado River water, which would not be available in times of drought, and would require more than $500 million of new federal funding to pay for pipeline infrastructure to deliver water to communities in need. The federal funding would have to be appropriated by U.S. Congress.
 
One pipeline would be built to send Colorado River water from Lake Powell on the Arizona-Utah border to the reservation.
 
During the special session Hope Macdonald Lonetree, Council Delegate from Tuba City, raised concerns on the council floor regarding the document as being flawed & different than what was presented to the Navajo Nation committees. Specifically, exhibit A was not located in the agreement and the issue of the agreement being distributed to delegates moments before the meeting. She motioned for the agenda item to be stricken from the agenda but failed to gain votes.
 
Delegate Amos Johnson motioned to table the legislation and to give one week for council delegates to take the agreement back to their communities for review. 49 voted in support, 32 against with 7 not voting.
 
“It is appropriate for the Navajo Nation to consider Hogan level family’s water rights and they have an obligation to do that, to take it to the communities for their input which has not been the case,” stated Milton Bluehouse Sr. former Navajo Nation President. “The more informed the people are the better the decision will be made, with respect to their rights.”
 
Hope Macdonald Lonetree asked, "Why would we waive our rights to the water for just a promise of federal funding, when we know historically the appropriations have not come to Navajo?"
 
“Why was there no deliberate and detailed consultation with the affected Dine' communities?” said R Begay a concerned Dine'. “Why has this process been so secret? What does Stanley Pollack have to hide? This is an extension of colonialism and genocide against our people. We will stand against this oppression.”
 
“The most important thing to show our leaders is that we are watching them, we are making sure that they are accountable to their communities and what we hold sacred as Dine’ people,” stated Kim Smith, resident of St. Michaels. “Water is an essential part of our way of life, our ceremonies, our livestock and most importantly, it’s our future. We are calling on all Dine’ people who value their future, their sacred water to join us when the council goes back into session and let them know we want them to VOTE NO!”
 
Concerned citizens for Dine’ Water Rights along with organizations such as Dine’ Care, To’ Nizhoni Ani’, Black Mesa Water Coalition, Council Advocating an Indigenous Manifesto, ECHOES, and others are calling for another rally and march at the next council session.
 
The date and time have not yet been set. Visit www.dinewaterrights.org for further details.
 
“This movement to oppose the Arizona Water Settlement is about our children, and we will not waive their water rights, not now not ever,” Stated Ron Milford, a concerned citizen with Dine’ Water Rights.
 
“Only one percent of the water in this world is water we can consume,” stated Daniel Tulley a Dine’ student from Phoenix who made the trip with a caravan of ASU students to Window Rock to voice his concerns. “Worldwide water shortages are facing us, we need to protect what we have here, because it is sacred and we need to protect it for future generations.” 

Tags

Capitalism Killed Mamahouse

09/24/2021 - 09:21 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
cayley
Original Body

Community of poor mothers and children in San Francisco’s Mission district is gone due to $700 dollar rent increase fueled by gentrification

(Co-edited by Tony Robles)

“What is the moon saying tonight, Mama?” My son looks into my face as I gaze into the face of the moon.  The moon’s voice travels like a whisper into my heart.

It was bedtime and my son and I were going through our nightly ritual of gazing at the moon, talking-story, reading, and naming our blessings and spirits from the rectangle window in our tiny bedroom . As someone who grew up houseless, rarely sheltered by a roof, much less a window, these moments were filled with gratitude, love and humility, always certain that our impending houselessness lurked silently around the next shaky rental agreement.

I no longer live within the soft wood frame of that house I was served with a rent increase of $700 dollars two months ago. But of course, the house never belonged to me. I only rented it. Lingered with trepidation within its bright long walls.

And so me, my son and the other poor mamas and countless children that co-habitated together  in that house we dubbed Mamahouse, sharing food, stories, resources, art, support, liberation and social justice consciousness in the Mission district of San Francisco, no longer dream, think, rest or live there.

The Herstory of Mamahouse

Mamahouse, the rented, smaller vision of the sweat-equity co-housing, dream that is Homefulness. Mamahouse, the revolutionary concept and project launched by my mama dee and me so many years ago, as a collective for mothers and children in poverty. A place to live and resist the deep isolation that kills the spirits of so many people in a capitalist society, combat the discrimination that impacts poor single parents of color, and provide peer support and scholarship for the struggle of raising a child in this society that never supports poor parents, much-less any parents, and has effectively separated our elders and ancestors from our  young folks.

Mamahouse has always worked, even as capitalism hasn’t. In its first incarnation Mamahouse existed within a tiny one bedroom apartment in the Tenderloin district, launched by a revolutionary slice of philanthro-pimped dollars, meant solely for a series of writing workshops with youth, adults and elders in poverty and the publication of Volume 1 of POOR Magazine, which was called HOMEFULNESS. The workshops and publication were done with great success, at which point my revolutionary, community driven, always tortured by capitalism, indigenous Taino, single mama of color in poverty, Dee, announced in an act of change-By-Any-Means-Necessary!, “let’s realize the dream of Homefulness beyond the pages, otherwise we may never see it happen.”

My beautiful and sad mama, tortured as an unwanted child of color in Amerikkka foster homes and orphanages, stripped, separated and devoid of her indigenous family, culture, language and community, never took anything for granted. She  always knew, like all us po’ folks know, that if you ever have any access, or money, that there is absolutely no guarantee that it will continue to be there, or continue to flow, no matter how hard you pull up your bootstraps, or dream the only-in-sleep-Amerikkkan Dream.  

As a Taino- Boricua-African-Irish, Roma and half-kkkolonizer human, I have lived my life in the ways of our elders, the indigenous way. When I was 11 my mama became disabled from her life of deep struggle with violence, racism and poverty. I had to drop out of school in the 6th grade to take care of her and start working in different underground economies. We struggled in and out of homelessness for the duration of my child-hood and into my young adult-hood. And as soon as we had a few resources to realize any dreams of counter-capitalism-separate-ness we did.

It was never easy, we were never supported in our efforts, but we knew if we were to infiltrate the destruction of capitalist separatism in real time, in our own lives, as a poor single mama of color and daughter, with no extended family or community, it was necessary that we act fast and act revolutionarily.

I lived as a “good daughter” with my ghetto-fabulous mama creating art, revolution and as much community as our resource poor, POOR Magazine family could cobble together, until she passed on her spirit journey in March of 2006.

I work so hard in my mind and heart everyday to not take my son through the sorrow of loneliness, desperation and poverty that me and my mama felt for so many  years. Isolation kills. Capitalism promotes isolation and the cult of independence and separation. Our barometer for sanity is based on how “happy” we can be while being alone, separate from others and at peace with our solitude.

Western psycho-therapists prescribe deadly drugs to help us be ok and happy and “sane” with our “alone-ness”. Hyper-consumer culture sells us constantly on the products that help us find independence, safety and security in our alone-ness. We are sold on the ghettoization of senior housing which “safely” houses our beautiful elders and securely archives, buries alive and forever silences their robust and deep and complex human souls. Away.

The tenderloin Mamahouse circa 1998 successfully housed two landless indigenous families, ran beautiful community dinners and art events, and silly moments of love and indigenous justice in real time.

We had to end it one year later, due to no more funding. Sadly, capital campaigns (property acquisitions) are usually only launched and realized by already wealthy organizations and individuals who have access to long ago stolen-from indigenous peoples U.S. resources.

In 2005, after a series of very serious organizational and personal losses at POOR Magazine, (organizational and personal lives are naturally enmeshed as a natural part of revolutionary poor people-led/indigenous people-led organizations like ours), I founded the next series of Mamahouses, this one in a substandard house in the Mission District, shared with many non-paying tenants with tails and feathers and wings and antennae’s, these un-seen tenants facilitated the only truly affordable market rate housing in the brutally gentrified mission district of San Francisco.

In 2007, the slumlord from hell of this Mamahouse actually set fire to her own property to rid her building of “problem tenants” like us mamas and children, in other words, tenants that tried to get her to fix the plumbing and rid the house of the serious rat, roach and pigeon infestation, proving one of my other theories, that poor folks who want/need to stay have to take sub-standard dangerous conditions like mold, insect infestation and asbestos, even if it kills us, just to remain housed.

Which brought us to Mama-house – the Gentrification Palace – an unbelievably beautiful place with shining floors and spacious rooms and a back-yard out of the pages of a glossy magazine, only affordable to us poor mamaz, because one of the mamaz had a housing subsidy..

“Mama can we stay here forever?,” My son would say while we lived within its serene structure with multiple other mamaz in and out of crisis, several children, a houseless family member or two and birds, cats and even a little dog, sharing stories, dreams, ideas and equity, crafting complex future plans for Homefulness’s truly shared equity and food localization and a micro-business economic self-sustainability model .

And then one day it was over. The slice of paper hung flimsily from the grand blue oak door. 60 Day NOTICE. Its words, slashing across the page, dripped with ancient blood of conquistadors, missionaries, real estate speculators, mortgage brokers, developers, and benevolent land-lords. My relationship with its beauty. Its never-really mine- stability. Its community with other mamaz and families, life-breathing support and love, was gone.

On our last day at Mama-house, all of us indigenous mamaz, brothers, sons, daughters, uncles, aunties, grandmothers and grandfathers huddled together, our abuelita pictures, icons and spirits from our mama altars, our clothing, stuffies, beds, desks, chairs, wastebaskets, feathers, icons, beads, shoes and toys strewn across the sidewalk, scattered from the wind-less hurricane of deadly gentrification and displacement, while default gentrifyers raced by to get $4.00 free-trade, organic, coffee and raw, vegan donuts at the plethora of blond wood filled cafes and $100 artist/designer dresses at the new, “underground” clothing stores beginning to fill up all the store-fronts in our inner-mission neighborhood.

My eyes cry tears of untold evictions and displacement of communities—of children and elders--faces that are left in faded murals to be covered in sheets of cold white paint or brushed over by the whimsical brush strokes of hipster/artists that have no respect for the neighborhoods they gentrify.

As the rays of warm mission sun began to slip away through our beloved, no longer-ours, front yard tree, all us mamas and children were still pulling thing after tragic thing out of unseen crevasses in the house.

All of sudden, my son, perched on a box full of his complete collection of legos, looked up at me, tilting his head to the side and holding back tears, “Mama, its ok, I just figured it out, we are going to move to Homefulness after this, and then we will all be ok.”

To this day my son and I are still houseless, we have bounced in and out of different temporary living situations all over the Bay and although I no longer live in the neighborhood, I still inhabit it on the margins, driving past my street, glancing at the just painted front steps, the newly planted flowers in the front yard, dreaming of the sounds, the love, the times spent in community there, lingering within its inside-ness.  Remembering, always recollecting the words of the Po’ Poet Laureate of POOR Magazine, A. Faye Hicks, “When us po folk are evicted we don’t always leave the neighborhood, we just move into the sidewalk hotels, the card-board hotels, the street..

 

Tags

Filipino American History Month

09/24/2021 - 09:21 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
PNNscholar1
Original Body

Who is to say the weeds Are not the roots?

Who is to say the roots Are not the weeds?

 

-–Poet Al Robles from the poem "Tagatac in Ifugao Mountain"

 

 

I was in a large yard of a Protestant minister in central Florida. Elvis had just been buried at Graceland and I was a kid trying to earn a few bucks. I attended a small Christian school where I was issued a red, white and blue uniform; recited the pledge of allegiance to both the American and Christian flags and was the school’s only non-white student. I had a lawn mower that started every so often and I solicited business in the various neighborhoods. I’d go door to door and ask the kind elderly—-and sometimes not so elderly—-ladies if they wanted their lawns cut. They often said yes and I’d start pushing my mower. The mower had unsteady wheels and I’d have to push very hard to move it. It was very tiring in the 90 plus degree heat. Sometimes it seemed I wasn’t moving at all—-just sweating, not getting anywhere.

 

I kept pushing that mower every day, door to door—the fragrance of oranges settling into my dirt-covered skin. When I got to the minister’s house, I knocked on his heavy wooden door. He looked like a middle aged underwear model (The kind you see in ads standing next to a row of progressively younger men…in a display of intergenerational underwear model mentorship/solidarity). His house was filled with heavy wooden furniture and smelled of lemon (furniture polish I’m sure, for I recall seeing not a single lemon tree on the property). The minister informed me that he didn’t need grass cutting but weed pulling. He led me to his backyard. Weeds covered the entire area. A hot gust of wind moved the weeds and they swayed like some kind of torrid choir. I began pulling the weeds, tugging and yanking. They were tough, like rope. When you pull weeds, you have to pull the roots otherwise the weeds will grow back.

 

I pulled and pulled, often removing just the stems, leaving the roots in place. I was sweating heavily and the sun left its mark on my brown arms. The more I pulled, the more the weeds seemed to spread. I began pulling my hair out. Then the kindly minister appeared with his permed hair (salt and pepper tinged) and a glass of lemonade. I took the glass, the dirt from my hand moist with the sweat of the glass. I held it to my lips and tilted the glass to the sun, pretending it was sweet. I finally cleared the yard of the weeds and I went into the house to wash my hands. I used much soap, scrubbing with vigor but much of the dirt remained, as if it were a permanent stain. I looked into the mirror and fixed my hair, striking a variety of what I thought were stunning poses (That would be the envy of any underwear model). I turned around to find the minister and his wife looking at me. I was embarrassed but for some reason the minister’s wife’s face was red. I thanked them for the lemonade. The minister handed me five dollars and I rushed out the door to the sound of their silent laughter. I walked down the road past houses shaded by orange trees and flanked by carports. I headed towards a corner store for something cold to drink. I kept walking when I heard the rumble from behind. I turned. A pickup truck was heading towards me. As it approached I saw an object flying towards my head. I stopped and ducked. On the ground was a beer can spewing foam. It rolled towards me as the Florida sun looked from above.

 

At that moment I realized I was Filipino and it would be many years before I understood what that meant. I learned about Filipinos that came to the US in the early days, like my grandparents, who arrived as workers, performing backbreaking labor in agriculture, working in the fields or in the canneries—often exploited and pitted against fellow workers—to maintain a system of cheap labor with no regard to worker’s rights. I often think of a picture—a famous picture—taken of Filipinos working in the asparagus fields, performing stoop labor. It was thought that Filipinos were better suited for this type of work since—in the eyes of the growers—they were short and, thus, closer to the ground. The stoop laborers bodies were bent, stooped and twisted—gnarled with dreams planted into the ground—seeds planted in anticipation of harvest. Then I think about pulling those lousy weeds over a summer in Florida. The Filipinos who came to this country in the early days did hard work all their lives.

 

I learned that Filipinos had been coming to the US since October 18, 1587–landing in Moro Bay—off the California coast— as part of the Manila Galleon Trade from Manila to Acapulco—which started in 1565 and lasted until 1815. By the time the Mayflower landed on the continent, there were conceivably a thousand or more Filipinos living on the West Coast. I didn’t learn of these things on my own but through my elders. I listened to the words of Filipino poets and activists like Al Robles, Oscar Penaranda, Bill Sorro, Lou Syquia, Norman Jayo, Jeff Tagami and Shirley Ancheta. They followed our elders—the manongs—trailing their footsteps to places like Watsonville, Salinas, Delano, Isleton, Imperial Valley, Stockton—seeking out the stories written in the hearts of our people. And they found it in small rooms where the only thing they had to do was sit and eat a warm bowl of rice and fish with our elders. What else is there? Asks the poet Al Robles.

 

October is Filipino American History month. Our history in this country has been erased and silenced but our stories cannot, will not die. Some Filipinos want to forget our history in this country but it can’t be silenced, erased or washed away. I remember the kid that I was, pulling weeds, dirt covering my hands, arms and mind. I can’t get rid of that dirt, clean beautiful dirt of memory covering the pages yet not written. © 2010 Tony Robles

Tags

Mothers vs Judicial Impunity

09/24/2021 - 09:21 by Anonymous (not verified)
Original Author
Mad Man Marlon
Original Body

Picture by Carina Lomeli
 
By Marlon Crump
 
 
"Marjorie Slabach; 
Do you hate Mamaz? 
Do you hate children? 
Do you hate yourself."

My questions that I had written on my protest sign targeting San Francisco Family Law Commissioner, Marjorie A. Slabach. She was being honored at an event titled "Through The Eyes of Children." Much to the outrage of all the "Silenced Mamas" Slabach has dehumanized, and the families she has subjected for destruction. This event was an injustice in of itself.

Two very historical events occurred on this Thursday October 7th day of 2010. One of them was the inner courage of single (Silenced) mamas to combat an outrageous event which honored their nemesis, San Francisco Family Law Commissioner, Marjorie A. Slabach. They did this by having their presence felt, and their voice heard. "Through The Eyes of Children" was the title of this event. 

Another event was my eternal reminiscence of surviving a horrible ordeal.  October 7th, 2005, twelve men with twelve guns (San Francisco Police Department) stormed inside my Single Room Occupancy Hotel Room, at twelve midnight. Each were all armed with a lie. My innocence was irrelevant to them. 

Five years later, I'm a constant reminder to them, and to the entire unjust, injustice system that employs them on the backs of tax payers of what resistance really means: Self-empowerment.................through the power of the pen starting with the "I" voice.


On this day, we christened R.L.A.P. (Revolutionary Legal Advocacy Project)

And protested against Judge Slave ach (Slabach)

Separating children from mothers of color

In other words, poor single parents

Is it that she ain't with child?

But don't take mine!

Disrespect the poor!

In her court with those destructive lines

Make you feel that you're being personalized and despised

Like being a poor dark single mama is a crime.


Poem from POOR comrade, Ruyata Akio McClothin a.k.a "RAM" expressing his thoughts of Marjorie Slabach and her unethical judicial behavior in the courtroom. 

We indeed, in fact "christened" the Revolutionary Legal Advocacy Project today to penetrate a "legal" system structured with a bureaucracy of lies with utilized oppression targeting people (and mamas) in poverty.  

Over two years ago, on May 12th, 2008 myself, POOR, and some of the "Silenced Mamas" impacted by Slabach rallied in front of the San Francisco Superior Courthouse, 400 McAllister St where she presides. Since then, a site for all single moms impacted by Slabach was created by me for them to send their stories via email mothersagainstslabach@yahoo.com

In addition, a petition was also created to hopefully have her unseated from the bench in the future, “Action to Unseat Judge Marjorie A. Slabach.”

Link to petition:
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/mothersagainstslabach/?e  

Consequently, Slabach continues to reign her disdain over the lives of single mamas, with impunity. Instead of being behind bars, she remains behind the bench. Fortunately, the "Silenced Mamas" movement painstakingly continues whereas accountability only comes from us people (and single mamas) in poverty. 

"Until this country comes to terms with it's culpability in allowing widespread poverty-related issues to exist, poor single mothers will continue to lose their children to the state. And we will continue to label these women as "bad mothers" to usage of our own guilt."Gaylynn Burroughs, staff attorney of the Bronx Defender inNew York City, as she was quoted in a 2008 San Francisco Bayview article, "Too poor to be a parent."


News of an anticipated act of resistance against an injustice travels faster than a comet. The Senior Director of Mission, Advocacy & Community Health Services, of St. Francis Memorial Hospital called our office a few hours before our planned protest rally. She was "concerned" about our action and what our intentions would be. (The rally took place at the hospital outside the Pierrotti Pavillion entrance section)   

I explained to her during our phone discussion which see-sawed with debates, that our opposition was solely on Slabach, not the hospital administration. It was very clear to me that she was worried about bad publicity and a tarnished image. Politely, I ended the conversation stating to her. "Two things: Position or Lives. Which is more important?"

We arrived at St. Francis Memorial Hospital located on 900 Hyde St. between Bush/Pine St. at 5:00 p.m literally on the dot. My POOR comrades, Queennandi, Carina Lomeli, Muteado Silencio, Ruyata Akio McClothin "RAM" Superbaby Mama#1 and your's truly began to re-port and sup-port as only POOR can.

I felt the unwelcoming ambiance within this community upon our arrival. Pedestrians pacing nervously past us. Above us on an outside terrace, a few hospital employees glared down on us with fearful, false smiles. A female motorist failed to honk her horn, and narrowly hit our comrade Muteado, as he pounded his drum near the street curve. The hospital's private security or "Rent-a-Cops" were somewhat reluctant regarding the positioning of our presence, even after I briefed him what we were doing. 

Nevertheless, the action went underway as we circled in solidarity against Slabach. 

A gentleman with a long salt-and peppered beard quickly joined our cause, along with Ann Larsen, a volunteer for the Coalition of Concerned Legal Professionals and Pamela Newman, a single mama victimized by Slabach.

"I went inside (the event) and they're are actually scared." Pamela said to us as she joined our action. Hearing this really brought a smile to my face. For those who've condoned Slabach's behavior are just as guilty, in my opinion. When I learned who some of the sponsors were; the Rally Visitation Services, and the San Francisco Bar Association, many questions and curiosities coursed through my mind.

Are these attorneys really representing the "interests" of their clients in her courtroom? Are the written evaluation "reports" accurate when they're submitted for Slabach's review, in her determination of what the "Best Interests of The Child" are?  

Unless there is an internal investigation leading to swift accountability, only time can know the answer.

"Do you hate Mamaz?"
"Do you hate children?"
"Do you hate yourself."

Two of these three questions are being raised by every single mama, their children and families every time Slabach bangs her gavel unjustly against them. The very last question I wonder is does Slabach truly hate her own self.................. "Through The Eyes of Children?"

"We worry about what a child will become tomorrow, yet we forget that he is someone today."  ~Stacia Tauscher

 
Tags