POOR Magazine contributor D'Shawn Williams responds to the recent ruling by the State supreme court to block Free speech defenses for panhandlers.
by D'Shawn Williams I close my eyes for just a moment and dream I know that warm air, that smell I used to have a car
Aaaaah to be going HOME.. home, with a plumbing Fast Forward six years - I am feeling your car The State Supreme Court gave a nod to municipal anti-begging laws this Thursday, ruling that they do not regulate the content of a person's speech and are not "constitutionally suspect." The 5-2 ruling has no bearing on Los Angeles' attempt to ban so-called aggressive panhandling because the ordinance is blocked in federal court. But the recent ruling basically robs me and my fellow panhandlers of the ability to defend our right to freedom of speech. The sad fact is, certain members of the community just don't want poor people such as myself in sight, just as Mayor Daly didn't want to see young African-American youth standing on street corners in Chicago (until the Supreme court ruled to the contrary on that case).
All I'm saying is eradicating images and individuals in poverty doesn't take away the problem or help the individual who is suffering - it just furthers the urban trend of economic apartheid. I'm not going to hurt you just because I am here, I am just here. |